[INFO] cloning repository https://github.com/solanex-official/dex-contracts
[INFO] running `Command { std: "git" "-c" "credential.helper=" "-c" "credential.helper=/workspace/cargo-home/bin/git-credential-null" "clone" "--bare" "https://github.com/solanex-official/dex-contracts" "/workspace/cache/git-repos/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsolanex-official%2Fdex-contracts", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr] Cloning into bare repository '/workspace/cache/git-repos/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsolanex-official%2Fdex-contracts'...
[INFO] running `Command { std: "git" "rev-parse" "HEAD", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 37d8f49e14af69c4632c40a370689c43403cc9f2
[INFO] testing solanex-official/dex-contracts against try#db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245 for pr-150681
[INFO] running `Command { std: "git" "clone" "/workspace/cache/git-repos/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsolanex-official%2Fdex-contracts" "/workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr] Cloning into '/workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source'...
[INFO] [stderr] done.
[INFO] started tweaking git repo https://github.com/solanex-official/dex-contracts
[INFO] finished tweaking git repo https://github.com/solanex-official/dex-contracts
[INFO] tweaked toml for git repo https://github.com/solanex-official/dex-contracts written to /workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source/Cargo.toml
[INFO] validating manifest of git repo https://github.com/solanex-official/dex-contracts on toolchain db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] crate git repo https://github.com/solanex-official/dex-contracts already has a lockfile, it will not be regenerated
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:845e597a41426bbf2703be69acdb67d10b6de511142d05cba7bbe119c898b2c7" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] fe4e21bc3081e271443157107465718696a94314808b3bf2527b71abf053840d
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "fe4e21bc3081e271443157107465718696a94314808b3bf2527b71abf053840d", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "fe4e21bc3081e271443157107465718696a94314808b3bf2527b71abf053840d", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "fe4e21bc3081e271443157107465718696a94314808b3bf2527b71abf053840d", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] fe4e21bc3081e271443157107465718696a94314808b3bf2527b71abf053840d
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:845e597a41426bbf2703be69acdb67d10b6de511142d05cba7bbe119c898b2c7" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] ef68af4355be24097fd864ee1f5640d9d38d6138395777f3353276cbbdee17c2
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "ef68af4355be24097fd864ee1f5640d9d38d6138395777f3353276cbbdee17c2", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling unicode-ident v1.0.13
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling proc-macro2 v1.0.79
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libc v0.2.161
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling once_cell v1.20.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde v1.0.210
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling generic-array v0.14.7
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-traits v0.2.19
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anyhow v1.0.91
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_json v1.0.132
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling either v1.13.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hashbrown v0.15.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling toml_datetime v0.6.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling wasm-bindgen-shared v0.2.95
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling winnow v0.6.20
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling proc-macro-error v1.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ahash v0.7.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rayon-core v1.12.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-frozen-abi-macro v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling itertools v0.10.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling im v15.1.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rustversion v1.0.18
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling cfg_aliases v0.2.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling sized-chunks v0.6.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh v1.5.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-frozen-abi v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling indexmap v2.6.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling memoffset v0.9.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rayon v1.10.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling crypto-common v0.1.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling block-buffer v0.10.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling digest v0.9.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling wasm-bindgen v0.2.95
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling arrayref v0.3.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libsecp256k1-core v0.2.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling digest v0.10.7
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bs58 v0.4.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling quote v1.0.36
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-integer v0.1.46
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling jobserver v0.1.32
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling syn v2.0.58
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling syn v1.0.109
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling sha2 v0.10.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-bigint v0.4.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling cc v1.1.31
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling unicode-normalization v0.1.24
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling constant_time_eq v0.3.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling base64 v0.12.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling proc-macro-error-attr v1.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling arrayvec v0.7.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libsecp256k1-gen-ecmult v0.2.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libsecp256k1-gen-genmult v0.2.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling aho-corasick v1.1.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling regex-syntax v0.8.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling unicode-segmentation v1.12.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libsecp256k1 v0.6.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling getrandom v0.2.15
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling getrandom v0.1.16
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling toml_edit v0.22.22
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling memmap2 v0.5.10
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling heck v0.3.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand_core v0.6.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand_core v0.5.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling signature v1.6.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling atty v0.2.14
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bs58 v0.5.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand_xoshiro v0.6.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hashbrown v0.11.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ed25519 v1.5.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling termcolor v1.4.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-sdk v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling derivation-path v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling blake3 v1.5.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-program v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling regex-automata v0.4.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling qstring v0.7.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling uriparse v0.6.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling chrono v0.4.38
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling assert_matches v1.5.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-rational v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-iter v0.1.45
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-complex v0.4.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-security-txt v1.1.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ieee754 v0.2.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_spanned v0.6.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling fast-math v0.1.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num v0.4.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling slow_primes v0.1.14
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh-derive-internal v0.10.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh-schema-derive-internal v0.10.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh-derive-internal v0.9.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh-schema-derive-internal v0.9.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling wasm-bindgen-backend v0.2.95
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling darling_core v0.20.10
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling proc-macro-crate v3.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-serialize-derive v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-ff-macros v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-ff-asm v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling derivative v2.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-derive-space v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-derive v0.3.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_derive v1.0.210
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling zerocopy-derive v0.7.35
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling thiserror-impl v1.0.65
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling zeroize_derive v1.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling syn_derive v0.1.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bytemuck_derive v1.8.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-sdk-macro v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-derive v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling zeroize v1.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling wasm-bindgen-macro-support v0.2.95
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling zerocopy v0.7.35
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling regex v1.11.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num_enum_derive v0.7.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh-derive v1.5.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling qualifier_attr v0.2.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling merlin v3.0.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-program-error-derive v0.4.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling env_logger v0.9.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-logger v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ppv-lite86 v0.2.20
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ahash v0.8.11
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bytemuck v1.16.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling thiserror v1.0.65
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-discriminator-syn v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hashbrown v0.13.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling wasm-bindgen-macro v0.2.95
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling darling_macro v0.20.10
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-discriminator-derive v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num_enum v0.7.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand_chacha v0.3.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand_chacha v0.2.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling darling v0.20.10
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_with_macros v2.3.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand v0.7.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand v0.8.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-std v0.4.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bv v0.11.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_bytes v0.11.15
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitflags v2.6.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bincode v1.3.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_with v2.3.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hex v0.4.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling uint v0.9.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling toml v0.5.11
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-lang-idl-spec v0.1.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling block-buffer v0.9.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling crypto-mac v0.8.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling cipher v0.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling universal-hash v0.4.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling aead v0.4.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling polyval v0.5.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling pbkdf2 v0.4.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling sha2 v0.9.9
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hmac v0.8.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling curve25519-dalek v3.2.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling sha3 v0.9.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hmac-drbg v0.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling aes v0.7.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ctr v0.8.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-serialize v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling tiny-bip39 v0.8.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling sha3 v0.10.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hmac v0.12.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling pbkdf2 v0.11.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-ff v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling aes-gcm-siv v0.10.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling proc-macro-crate v0.1.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ed25519-dalek v1.0.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-syn v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-lang-idl v0.1.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ed25519-dalek-bip32 v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh-derive v0.9.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh-derive v0.10.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh v0.9.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling borsh v0.10.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-attribute-account v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-attribute-program v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-attribute-error v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-derive-accounts v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-derive-serde v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-attribute-constant v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-attribute-event v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-attribute-access-control v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-poly v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-ec v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-bn254 v0.4.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling light-poseidon v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-program-error v0.4.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-discriminator v0.2.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-memo v4.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-lang v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token v4.0.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling mpl-token-metadata v4.1.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling pythnet-sdk v2.1.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling pyth-solana-receiver-sdk v0.3.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-zk-token-sdk v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-pod v0.2.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-type-length-value v0.4.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token-group-interface v0.2.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-tlv-account-resolution v0.6.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token-metadata-interface v0.3.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-transfer-hook-interface v0.6.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token-2022 v3.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-associated-token-account v3.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-spl v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ai_dex v0.1.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir/programs/ai_dex)
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-heap`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-panic`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/close_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/increase_liquidity.rs:58:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 58 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_tick_array.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position_with_metadata.rs:26:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/swap.rs:42:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 42 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/two_hop_swap.rs:23:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 23 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/close_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/delete_trade_batch_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position_with_metadata.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/open_trade_batch_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_fees.rs:30:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 30 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_protocol_fees.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_reward.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_referral_fee.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_config.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_fee_tier.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reward.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_swap_referral.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reinvestments.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_fees_and_rewards.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_reinvestments.rs:31:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_protocol_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_protocol_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_new_oracle_account.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_oracle_maximum_age.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/temporary/set_start_timestamp_lp.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority_by_config_authority.rs:15:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 15 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_emissions.rs:24:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 24 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_default_reinvestment_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_new_reinvestments_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/create_super_admin.rs:6:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/update_super_admin.rs:5:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 5 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_1.rs:34:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_2.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/test/mock_oracle_price_update.rs:7:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 7 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `no-log-ix-name`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr]     Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 43.59s
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "ef68af4355be24097fd864ee1f5640d9d38d6138395777f3353276cbbdee17c2", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "ef68af4355be24097fd864ee1f5640d9d38d6138395777f3353276cbbdee17c2", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] ef68af4355be24097fd864ee1f5640d9d38d6138395777f3353276cbbdee17c2
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:845e597a41426bbf2703be69acdb67d10b6de511142d05cba7bbe119c898b2c7" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245" "test" "--frozen" "--no-run" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 577fa07a938325a0b30a09870994d9de8db45c7737ea4cf1b193143cd7b14d59
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "577fa07a938325a0b30a09870994d9de8db45c7737ea4cf1b193143cd7b14d59", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libm v0.2.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-traits v0.2.19
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitflags v2.6.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling regex-automata v0.4.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling darling_core v0.13.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling linux-raw-sys v0.4.14
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling wait-timeout v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rustix v0.38.37
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling quick-error v1.2.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bit-vec v0.6.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rand_xorshift v0.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling unarray v0.1.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bit-set v0.5.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-integer v0.1.46
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-std v0.4.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling chrono v0.4.38
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-complex v0.4.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-bigint v0.4.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-iter v0.1.45
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling darling_macro v0.13.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling darling v0.13.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_with_macros v1.5.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling tempfile v3.13.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling regex v1.11.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling rusty-fork v0.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling serde_with v1.14.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-serialize v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num-rational v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling env_logger v0.9.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling proptest v1.5.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-ff v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-logger v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling num v0.4.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling slow_primes v0.1.14
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-poly v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-ec v0.4.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ark-bn254 v0.4.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling light-poseidon v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-program v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-sdk v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-program-error v0.4.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-discriminator v0.2.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-lang v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token v4.0.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-memo v4.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling mpl-token-metadata v4.1.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling pythnet-sdk v2.1.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling pyth-solana-receiver-sdk v0.3.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling solana-zk-token-sdk v1.18.26
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-pod v0.2.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-type-length-value v0.4.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token-group-interface v0.2.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-tlv-account-resolution v0.6.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token-metadata-interface v0.3.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-transfer-hook-interface v0.6.5
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-token-2022 v3.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling spl-associated-token-account v3.0.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling anchor-spl v0.30.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling ai_dex v0.1.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir/programs/ai_dex)
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-heap`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-panic`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/close_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/increase_liquidity.rs:58:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 58 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_tick_array.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position_with_metadata.rs:26:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/swap.rs:42:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 42 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/two_hop_swap.rs:23:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 23 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/close_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/delete_trade_batch_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position_with_metadata.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/open_trade_batch_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_fees.rs:30:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 30 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_protocol_fees.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_reward.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_referral_fee.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_config.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_fee_tier.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reward.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_swap_referral.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reinvestments.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_fees_and_rewards.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_reinvestments.rs:31:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_protocol_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_protocol_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_new_oracle_account.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_oracle_maximum_age.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/temporary/set_start_timestamp_lp.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority_by_config_authority.rs:15:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 15 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_emissions.rs:24:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 24 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_default_reinvestment_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_new_reinvestments_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/create_super_admin.rs:6:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/update_super_admin.rs:5:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 5 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_1.rs:34:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_2.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/test/mock_oracle_price_update.rs:7:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 7 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `no-log-ix-name`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-heap`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-panic`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/close_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/increase_liquidity.rs:58:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 58 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_tick_array.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position_with_metadata.rs:26:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/swap.rs:42:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 42 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/two_hop_swap.rs:23:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 23 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/close_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/delete_trade_batch_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position_with_metadata.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/open_trade_batch_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_fees.rs:30:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 30 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_protocol_fees.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_reward.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_referral_fee.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_config.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_fee_tier.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reward.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_swap_referral.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reinvestments.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_fees_and_rewards.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_reinvestments.rs:31:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_protocol_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_protocol_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_new_oracle_account.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_oracle_maximum_age.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/temporary/set_start_timestamp_lp.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority_by_config_authority.rs:15:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 15 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_emissions.rs:24:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 24 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_default_reinvestment_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_new_reinvestments_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/create_super_admin.rs:6:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/update_super_admin.rs:5:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 5 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_1.rs:34:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_2.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/test/mock_oracle_price_update.rs:7:10
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 7 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stdout]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `no-log-ix-name`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stdout]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr]     Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 31.91s
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "577fa07a938325a0b30a09870994d9de8db45c7737ea4cf1b193143cd7b14d59", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "577fa07a938325a0b30a09870994d9de8db45c7737ea4cf1b193143cd7b14d59", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 577fa07a938325a0b30a09870994d9de8db45c7737ea4cf1b193143cd7b14d59
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:845e597a41426bbf2703be69acdb67d10b6de511142d05cba7bbe119c898b2c7" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245" "test" "--frozen", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] ed45242973dd10b1b6de8c0f61a4f108d64f467bebdccd606c57369a958b1ccf
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "ed45242973dd10b1b6de8c0f61a4f108d64f467bebdccd606c57369a958b1ccf", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-heap`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stderr]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stderr]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_heap_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_heap_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `custom-panic`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stderr]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `solana`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stderr]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, `solaris`, and `solid_asp3` and 14 more
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `$crate::custom_panic_default` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` may come from an old version of the `solana_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p solana_program`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `$crate::custom_panic_default` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/close_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/increase_liquidity.rs:58:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 58 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_tick_array.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/open_position_with_metadata.rs:26:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/swap.rs:42:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 42 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/two_hop_swap.rs:23:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 23 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/close_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/delete_trade_batch_position.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position.rs:18:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 18 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/initialize_trade_batch_position_with_metadata.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/trade_batch/open_trade_batch_position.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 22 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_fees.rs:30:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 30 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_protocol_fees.rs:25:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 25 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_reward.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/collect/collect_referral_fee.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_config.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_fee_tier.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reward.rs:20:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 20 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_swap_referral.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/initialize/initialize_reinvestments.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_fees_and_rewards.rs:21:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 21 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/update/update_reinvestments.rs:31:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 31 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_protocol_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_fee_rate.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_protocol_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_default_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/set_swap_referral_reward_fee_rate.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_new_oracle_account.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/oracle/set_oracle_maximum_age.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/temporary/set_start_timestamp_lp.rs:14:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 14 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority.rs:13:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 13 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_authority_by_config_authority.rs:15:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 15 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reward/set_reward_emissions.rs:24:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 24 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_default_reinvestment_fee_rate.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/set/reinvestments/set_new_reinvestments_authority.rs:12:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 12 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/create_super_admin.rs:6:10
[INFO] [stderr]   |
[INFO] [stderr] 6 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]   |
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/fees_rewards/admin/update_super_admin.rs:5:10
[INFO] [stderr]   |
[INFO] [stderr] 5 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]   |
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_1.rs:34:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 34 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/initialize_pool/initialize_pool_step_2.rs:27:10
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 27 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]    |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]  --> programs/ai_dex/src/instructions/test/mock_oracle_price_update.rs:7:10
[INFO] [stderr]   |
[INFO] [stderr] 7 | #[derive(Accounts)]
[INFO] [stderr]   |          ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]   |
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]   = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]   = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]   = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stderr]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `anchor-debug`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stderr]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a derive macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `Accounts` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the derive macro `Accounts` may come from an old version of the `anchor_derive_accounts` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_derive_accounts`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the derive macro `Accounts` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `no-log-ix-name`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> programs/ai_dex/src/lib.rs:26:1
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[program]
[INFO] [stderr]    | ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: expected values for `feature` are: `cpi`, `default`, `idl-build`, `no-entrypoint`, and `no-idl`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: try referring to `program` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: the attribute macro `program` may come from an old version of the `anchor_attribute_program` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p anchor_attribute_program`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `program` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: `ai_dex` (lib) generated 55 warnings (5 duplicates)
[INFO] [stderr] warning: `ai_dex` (lib test) generated 55 warnings (55 duplicates)
[INFO] [stderr]     Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.35s
[INFO] [stderr]      Running unittests src/lib.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/ai_dex-f233b503f0fa6492)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] running 320 tests
[INFO] [stdout] test constants::nft::ai_dex_nft_update_auth::test_id ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test instructions::fees_rewards::collect::collect_reward::unit_tests::test_calculate_collect_reward_vault_sufficient_tokens ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test instructions::fees_rewards::collect::collect_reward::unit_tests::test_calculate_collect_reward_vault_insufficient_tokens ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div::test_mul_div_does_not_round ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_div_round_up::test_mul_div_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div_round_up::test_mul_div_overflow_panics ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div_round_up::test_mul_div_rounding_up_rounds_up ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_div_round_up::test_mul_div_rounding_up_rounds_up ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div::test_mul_div_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div::test_mul_div_large_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div_round_up::test_mul_div_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div::test_mul_div_shift_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mult_shift_right_round_up::test_mul_shift_right_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div::test_mul_div_overflows ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_as_u128_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mult_shift_right_round_up::test_mul_shift_right_u64_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_as_u64_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_into_u128_error ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_into_u128_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_into_u64_error ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_into_u64_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_calculate_initial_sqrt_price_large_exponent_adjustment ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_calculate_initial_sqrt_price_large_price ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::liquidity_math::liquidity_math_tests::test_invalid_add_liquidity_delta_overflow ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_calculate_initial_sqrt_price_negative_price ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::liquidity_math::liquidity_math_tests::test_invalid_add_liquidity_delta_underflow ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_calculate_initial_sqrt_price_positive_price_negative_exponent ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_price_conversion_back_and_forth ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_calculate_initial_sqrt_price_zero_price ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_negative_price ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_calculate_initial_sqrt_price_exponent_adjustment_positive ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_input_max_1pct_fee ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_input_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_input_zero_liq ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::oracle_math::tests::test_calculate_initial_sqrt_price_positive_price_positive_exponent ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::liquidity_math::liquidity_math_tests::test_valid_add_liquidity_delta ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_input_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::fuzz_tests::test_checked_mul_div_round_up_if ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_output_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_input_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_output_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_input_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_output_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_output_zero_liq ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_output_zero_liq ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_b_to_a_input_zero_liq ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_compute_swap::swap_a_to_b_output_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::fuzz_tests::test_div_round_up_if ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::discontiguous_multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::fuzz_tests::test_div_round_up_if_u256 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_a_to_b_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_a_to_b_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_b_to_a_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::fuzz_tests::test_mul_shift_right_round_up_if ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_a_to_b_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::multi_tick::swap_b_to_a_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_a_to_b_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_b_to_a_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_a_to_b_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_b_to_a_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::no_cross::swap_b_to_a_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::protocol_rate::protocol_rate ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::protocol_rate::protocol_rate_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_a_to_b_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_a_to_b_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_a_to_b_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_a_to_b_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_b_to_a_input ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_b_to_a_input_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_b_to_a_output ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::unit_tests::test_swap::single_tick::swap_b_to_a_output_partial ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::fuzz_tests::test_compute_swap ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::sqrt_price_from_tick_index_tests::test_exact_bit_values ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::sqrt_price_from_tick_index_tests::test_tick_at_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::sqrt_price_from_tick_index_tests::test_tick_at_min ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::sqrt_price_from_tick_index_tests::test_tick_below_min ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_max_add_one ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::swap_math::fuzz_tests::test_compute_swap_inversion ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_min ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_max_sub_one ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_min_add_one ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_min_sub_one ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_one ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_one_add_one ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_at_one_sub_one ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::fuzz_tests::test_sqrt_price_from_tick_index_is_sequence ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::token_math::test_get_amount_delta::test_get_amount_delta_a_overflow ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::token_math::test_get_amount_delta::test_get_amount_delta_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::token_math::test_get_amount_delta::test_get_amount_delta_price_diff_zero_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::fuzz_tests::test_tick_index_and_sqrt_price_symmetry ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::token_math::fuzz_tests::test_get_amount_delta_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::fuzz_tests::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::fuzz_tests::test_tick_index_from_sqrt_price_is_sequence ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_checked_shift_word_left ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::fuzz_tests::test_tick_index_to_sqrt_price ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::token_math::fuzz_tests::test_get_amount_delta_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_checked_shift_word_left_overflow ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_add ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::token_math::fuzz_tests::test_get_next_sqrt_price_from_b_round_down ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::token_math::fuzz_tests::test_get_next_sqrt_price_from_a_round_up ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_eq ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_div ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_shift_left ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_add::test_add_overflow_0 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_add::test_add_overflow_1 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_overflow_equality ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_0 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_lt ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_3 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_lte ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_5 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_4 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_1 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_2 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_sub::test_sub_underflow_0 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_sub::test_sub_underflow_1 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_gt ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_shift_right ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_6 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator_tests::test_next_ai_dex_reward_infos_delta_zero_on_overflow ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator_tests::test_next_ai_dex_reward_infos_same_timestamp_no_op ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator_tests::test_next_ai_dex_reward_infos_zero_liquidity_no_op ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator_tests::test_next_ai_dex_reward_infos_no_initialized_rewards ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_mul_u256 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_get_add_inv ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator_tests::test_next_ai_dex_reward_infos_all_initialized_rewards ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator_tests::test_next_ai_dex_reward_infos_some_initialized_rewards ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::accrued_tokens_ok_closed_position_ticks_remain_initialized ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_above_checkpoint_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_below_checkpoint_above ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_below_checkpoint_below ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_above_checkpoint_above ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_above_checkpoint_below ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_below_checkpoint_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_inside_checkpoint_below ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::neg_delta_current_tick_above ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::neg_delta_current_tick_below ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_gte ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_mul ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_sub ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::pos_delta_current_tick_below ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::pos_delta_current_tick_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_inside_checkpoint_above ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::fees_and_rewards::global_accumulators_overflow::overflow_inside_checkpoint_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::neg_delta_current_tick_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::zero_delta_current_tick_above ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::zero_delta_current_tick_below ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::pos_delta_current_tick_above ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::ox_position::current_tick_above::neg_delta_current_tick_above_oo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::oo_position::zero_delta_current_tick_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::ox_position::current_tick_above::neg_delta_current_tick_above_ox_lower_ox_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::ox_position::current_tick_below::neg_delta_current_tick_below_oo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::ox_position::current_tick_below::neg_delta_current_tick_below_oo_lower_oo_upper_non_zero_checkpoints ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::ox_position::current_tick_below::neg_delta_current_tick_below_ox_lower_ox_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::ox_position::current_tick_inside::neg_delta_current_tick_inside_oo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::ox_position::current_tick_inside::neg_delta_current_tick_inside_ox_lower_ox_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_above::pos_delta_current_tick_above_oo_lower_oo_upper_non_zero_checkpoints ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_above::pos_delta_current_tick_above_oo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_above::pos_delta_current_tick_above_oo_lower_xo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_above::pos_delta_current_tick_above_xo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_above::pos_delta_current_tick_above_xo_lower_xo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_above::pos_delta_current_tick_above_xo_lower_oo_upper_underflow_owed_amounts_ok ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_below::pos_delta_current_tick_below_oo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_below::pos_delta_current_tick_below_oo_lower_xo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_below::pos_delta_current_tick_below_xo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_below::pos_delta_current_tick_below_xo_lower_oo_upper_underflow ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_below::pos_delta_current_tick_below_xo_lower_xo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_inside::pos_delta_current_tick_inside_oo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_inside::pos_delta_current_tick_inside_oo_lower_xo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_inside::pos_delta_current_tick_inside_xo_lower_oo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_inside::pos_delta_current_tick_inside_xo_lower_oo_upper_underflow ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xo_position::current_tick_inside::pos_delta_current_tick_inside_xo_lower_xo_upper ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::position_orchestrator::position_orchestrator_unit_tests::fee_delta_overflow_defaults_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::position_orchestrator::position_orchestrator_unit_tests::ok_negative_liquidity_delta_fee_growth ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::position_orchestrator::position_orchestrator_unit_tests::ok_positive_liquidity_delta_fee_growth ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::position_orchestrator::position_orchestrator_unit_tests::ok_reward_growth ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::position_orchestrator::position_orchestrator_unit_tests::reward_delta_overflow_defaults_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::fuzz_tests::test_fmt ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_error_tests::swap_ends_at_sqrt_price_0 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bit_math::test_bit_math::test_mul_div_round_up::test_mul_div_rounding_upfloor_max_panics - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_error_tests::swap_starts_from_sqrt_price_0 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_as_u128_panic - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::bn::test_u256::test_as_u64_panic - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::min_l_at_min_sqrt_price_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::next_initialized_tick_in_next_array_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::next_initialized_tick_in_next_array_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::next_initialized_tick_in_same_array_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::max_l_at_max_tick_b_to_a - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::next_initialized_tick_in_same_array_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::next_initialized_tick_not_in_adjacent_array_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::next_initialized_tick_not_in_adjacent_array_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::no_initialized_tick_range_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::no_initialized_tick_range_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::u256_math::test_div::test_div_7 - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator::ai_dex_orchestrator_tests::test_next_ai_dex_reward_infos_invalid_timestamp - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::traversal_from_last_tick_in_array_to_next_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::traversal_from_last_tick_in_array_to_next_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::traversal_to_last_tick_in_last_array_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::traversal_to_last_tick_in_last_array_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::traversal_to_last_tick_in_next_array_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::traversal_to_last_tick_in_next_array_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::zero_l_across_tick_range_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::zero_l_across_tick_range_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xx_position::neg_delta_lower_tick_liquidity_underflow - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::zero_l_after_first_tick_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xx_position::neg_delta_position_liquidity_underflow - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::zero_l_after_first_tick_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xx_position::neg_delta_upper_tick_liquidity_underflow - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::zero_l_between_init_ticks_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::liquidity_orchestrator::calculate_modify_liquidity_unit_tests::xx_position::zero_delta_on_empty_position_not_allowed - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::zero_l_between_init_ticks_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::position_orchestrator::position_orchestrator_unit_tests::liquidity_overflow - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_at_current_tick_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_at_current_tick_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::position_orchestrator::position_orchestrator_unit_tests::liquidity_underflow - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_error_tests::insufficient_tick_array_range_test_a_to_b - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_at_max_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_at_max_with_last_init_tick_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_error_tests::insufficient_tick_array_range_test_b_to_a - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_error_tests::swap_does_not_overflow - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_at_min_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_error_tests::swap_invalid_timestamp - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_over_current_tick_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_over_current_tick_stop_limit_b_to_a ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_error_tests::swap_zero_tokens - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test math::tick_math::sqrt_price_from_tick_index_tests::test_tick_exceed_max - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::sqrt_price_exceeds_tick_range_a_to_b - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_liquidity_tests::sqrt_price_exceeds_tick_range_b_to_a - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_under_current_tick_stop_limit_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_under_current_tick_a_to_b ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::tick_orchestrator::tick_orchestrator_tests::test_next_fee_growths_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::tick_orchestrator::tick_orchestrator_tests::test_next_reward_growths_inside ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::tick_orchestrator::tick_orchestrator_tests::test_next_tick_cross_update ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::tick_orchestrator::tick_orchestrator_tests::test_next_tick_modify_liquidity_update ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::tick_orchestrator::tick_orchestrator_tests::test_next_tick_modify_liquidity_update_errors ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_over_max_tick - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::ai_dex::test_ai_dex_reward_info_initialized ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_over_current_tick_a_to_b - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::ai_dex::test_ai_dex_reward_info_not_initialized ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position::is_position_empty_tests::test_fee_a_non_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_under_current_tick_b_to_a - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position::is_position_empty_tests::test_fee_b_non_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test orchestrator::swap_orchestrator::swap_sqrt_price_tests::sqrt_price_limit_under_min_tick - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position::is_position_empty_tests::test_liquidity_non_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position::is_position_empty_tests::test_reward_0_non_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position::is_position_empty_tests::test_position_empty ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position::is_position_empty_tests::test_reward_1_non_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position::is_position_empty_tests::test_reward_2_non_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_initialize_tests::test_default ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_is_deletable_tests::test_default_is_deletable ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_all_open_and_all_close ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_is_deletable_tests::test_each_bit_detectable ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_double_close_should_be_failed ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_double_open_should_be_failed ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_open_and_close_max ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_open_and_close_middle ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_open_and_close_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::array_update_tests::update_applies_successfully ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_out_of_bounds_tests::test_max_tick_index ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_out_of_bounds_tests::test_max_tick_index_add_1 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_out_of_bounds_tests::test_min_tick_index ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_out_of_bounds_tests::test_min_tick_index_sub_1 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_min_tick_array_start_tick_is_valid_ts128 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_min_tick_array_start_tick_is_valid_ts8 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_min_tick_array_sub_1_start_tick_is_invalid_ts128 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_min_tick_array_sub_1_start_tick_is_invalid_ts8 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_start_tick_is_not_valid_ts128 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_start_tick_is_not_valid_ts8 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_start_tick_is_valid_negative_ts128 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_start_tick_is_valid_negative_ts8 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_start_tick_is_valid_ts128 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_start_tick_is_valid_ts8 ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::check_is_valid_start_tick_tests::test_start_tick_is_zero ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::full_range_indexes_tests::test_full_range_only_tick_spacing ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::full_range_indexes_tests::test_max_tick_spacing ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::full_range_indexes_tests::test_min_tick_spacing ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::full_range_indexes_tests::test_standard_tick_spacing ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test test_id ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::a_to_b::search_range_on_left ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::a_to_b::range_panic_on_end_range_plus_one - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::a_to_b_search_entire_range ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::a_to_b::range_panic_on_start_range_sub_one - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::a_to_b::search_range ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::a_to_b_search_on_initialized_index ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::array_1_out_of_sequence - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::b_to_a::search_range ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::b_to_a::range_panic_on_start_range_sub_one - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::b_to_a_search_entire_range ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::modify_ticks::cannot_modify_invalid_array_index ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::modify_ticks::modify_tick_init_tick ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::modify_ticks::modify_tick_uninitializable_tick ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::modify_ticks::modify_tick_uninitialized_tick ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::tick_bound::a_to_b_search_reaching_min_tick ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::tick_bound::b_to_a_search_reaching_max_tick ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::b_to_a::range_panic_on_end_range_plus_one - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test util::swap_tick_sequence::swap_tick_sequence_tests::array_0_out_of_sequence - should panic ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::fuzz_tests::test_get_offset ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::tick::fuzz_tests::test_get_search_and_offset ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_close_trade_batch_index_out_of_bounds ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test state::position_trade_batch::position_trade_batch_open_and_close_tests::test_open_trade_batch_index_out_of_bounds ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test tests::swap_integration_tests::run_swap_integration_tests ... FAILED
[INFO] [stdout] test util::token::fuzz_tests::test_calculate_transfer_fee_included_amount ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] failures:
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] ---- tests::swap_integration_tests::run_swap_integration_tests stdout ----
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 6 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 7 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 10 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 11 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 17 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 18 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 19 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 20 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 21 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 22 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 23 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 24 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 25 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 26 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 27 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 28 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 33 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 34 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 35 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 36 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 37 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 38 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 39 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 40 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 41 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 42 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 43 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 44 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 49 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 50 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 52 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 53 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 54 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 55 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 56 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 57 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 58 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 59 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 60 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 65 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 66 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 67 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 69 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 70 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 71 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 73 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 74 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 75 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 82 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 83 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 86 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 87 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 90 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 91 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 97 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 101 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 104 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 105 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 108 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 130 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 131 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 134 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 135 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 138 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 139 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 145 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 149 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 152 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 153 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 156 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 322 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 326 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 327 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 330 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 331 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 337 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 338 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 339 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 340 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 341 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 342 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 343 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 344 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 345 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 346 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 347 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 348 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 353 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 354 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 355 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 356 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 357 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 358 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 359 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 360 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 361 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 362 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 363 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 364 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 369 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 370 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 372 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 373 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 374 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 375 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 376 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 377 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 378 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 379 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 380 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 385 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 386 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 387 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 389 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 390 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 391 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 393 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 394 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 395 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 402 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 403 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 406 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 407 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 410 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 411 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 417 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 421 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 424 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 425 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 428 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 450 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 451 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 454 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 455 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 458 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 459 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 465 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 469 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 472 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 473 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 476 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 642 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 646 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 647 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 650 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 651 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 657 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 658 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 659 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 660 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 661 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 662 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 663 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 664 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 665 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 666 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 667 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 668 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 673 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 674 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 675 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 676 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 677 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 678 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 679 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 680 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 681 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 682 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 683 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 684 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 689 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 690 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 692 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 693 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 694 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 695 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 696 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 697 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 698 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 699 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 700 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 705 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 706 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 707 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 709 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 710 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 711 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 713 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 714 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 715 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 722 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 723 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 726 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 727 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 730 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 731 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 737 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 741 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 744 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 745 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 748 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 753 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 754 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 757 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 758 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 761 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 762 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 770 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 771 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 774 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 775 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 778 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 779 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 785 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 789 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 792 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 793 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 796 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 1.00%/2500 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 962 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 966 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 967 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 970 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 971 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 977 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 978 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 979 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 980 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 981 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 982 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 983 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 984 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 985 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 986 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 987 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 988 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 993 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 994 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 995 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 996 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 997 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 998 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 999 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1000 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1001 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1002 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1003 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1004 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1009 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1010 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1012 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1013 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1014 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1015 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1016 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1017 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1018 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1019 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1020 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1025 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1026 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1027 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1029 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1030 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1031 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1033 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1034 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1035 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1042 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1043 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1046 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1047 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1050 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1051 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1057 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1061 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1064 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1065 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1068 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1090 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1091 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1094 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1095 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1098 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1099 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1105 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1109 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1112 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1113 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1116 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1282 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1286 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1287 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1290 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1291 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1297 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1298 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1299 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1300 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1301 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1302 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1303 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1304 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1305 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1306 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1307 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1308 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1313 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1314 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1315 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1316 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1317 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1318 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1319 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1320 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1321 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1322 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1323 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1324 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1329 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1330 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1332 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1333 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1334 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1335 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1336 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1337 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1338 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1339 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1340 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1345 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1346 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1347 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1349 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1350 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1351 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1353 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1354 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1355 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1362 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1363 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1366 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1367 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1370 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1371 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1377 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1381 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1384 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1385 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1388 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1410 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1411 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1414 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1415 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1418 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1419 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1425 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1429 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1432 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1433 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1436 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1602 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1606 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1607 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1610 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1611 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1617 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1618 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1619 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1620 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1621 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1622 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1623 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1624 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1625 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1626 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1627 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1628 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1633 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1634 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1635 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1636 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1637 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1638 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1639 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1640 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1641 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1642 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1643 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1644 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1649 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1650 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1652 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1653 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1654 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1655 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1656 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1657 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1658 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1659 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1660 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1665 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1666 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1667 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1669 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1670 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1671 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1673 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1674 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1675 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1682 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1683 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1686 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1687 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1690 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1691 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1697 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1701 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1704 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1705 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1708 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1713 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1714 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1717 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1718 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1721 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1722 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1730 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1731 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1734 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1735 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1738 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1739 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1745 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1749 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1752 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1753 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1756 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 6.55%/600 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1922 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1926 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1927 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1930 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1931 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1937 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1938 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1939 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1940 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1941 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1942 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1943 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1944 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1945 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1946 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1947 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1948 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1953 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1954 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1955 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1956 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1957 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1958 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1959 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1960 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1961 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1962 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1963 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1964 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1969 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1970 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1972 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1973 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1974 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1975 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1976 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1977 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1978 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1979 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1980 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1985 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1986 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1987 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1989 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1990 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1991 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1993 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1994 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 1995 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2002 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2003 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2006 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2007 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2010 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2011 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2017 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2021 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2024 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2025 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2028 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2050 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2051 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2054 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2055 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2058 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2059 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2065 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2069 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2072 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2073 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2076 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2242 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2246 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2247 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2250 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2251 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2257 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2258 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2259 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2260 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2261 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2262 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2263 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2264 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2265 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2266 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2267 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2268 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2273 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2274 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2275 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2276 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2277 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2278 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2279 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2280 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2281 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2282 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2283 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2284 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2289 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2290 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2292 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2293 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2294 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2295 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2296 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2297 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2298 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2299 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2300 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2305 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2306 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2307 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2309 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2310 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2311 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2313 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2314 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2315 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2322 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2323 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2326 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2327 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2330 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2331 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2337 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2341 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2344 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2345 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2348 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2370 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2371 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2374 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2375 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2378 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2379 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2385 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2389 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2392 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2393 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2396 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2562 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2566 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2567 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2570 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2571 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2577 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2578 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2579 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2580 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2581 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2582 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2583 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2584 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2585 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2586 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2587 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2588 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2593 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2594 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2595 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2596 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2597 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2598 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2599 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2600 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2601 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2602 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2603 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2604 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2609 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2610 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2612 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2613 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2614 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2615 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2616 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2617 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2618 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2619 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2620 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2625 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2626 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2627 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2629 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2630 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2631 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2633 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2634 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2635 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2642 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2643 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2646 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2647 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2650 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2651 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2657 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2661 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2664 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2665 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2668 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2673 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2674 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2677 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2678 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2681 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2682 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2690 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2691 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2694 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2695 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2698 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2699 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2705 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2709 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2712 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2713 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stderr] error: test failed, to rerun pass `--lib`
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2716 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.07%/300 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2882 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2886 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2887 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2890 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2891 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2897 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2898 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2899 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2900 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2901 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2902 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2903 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2904 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2905 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2906 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2907 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2908 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2913 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2914 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2915 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2916 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2917 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2918 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2919 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2920 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2921 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2922 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2923 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2924 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2929 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2930 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2932 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2933 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2934 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2935 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2936 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2937 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2938 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2939 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2940 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2945 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2946 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2947 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2949 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2950 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2951 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2953 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2954 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2955 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2962 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2963 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2966 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2967 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2970 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2971 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2977 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2981 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2984 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2985 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 2988 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3010 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3011 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3014 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3015 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3018 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3019 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3025 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3029 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3032 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3033 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3036 - In a ts_1 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3202 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3206 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3207 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3210 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3211 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3217 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3218 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3219 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3220 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3221 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3222 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3223 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3224 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3225 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3226 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3227 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3228 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3233 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3234 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3235 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3236 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3237 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3238 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3239 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3240 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3241 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3242 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3243 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3244 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3249 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3250 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3252 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3253 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3254 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3255 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3256 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3257 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3258 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3259 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3260 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3265 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3266 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3267 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3269 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3270 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3271 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3273 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3274 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3275 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3282 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3283 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3286 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3287 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3290 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3291 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3297 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3301 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3304 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3305 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3308 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3330 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3331 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3334 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3335 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3338 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3339 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3345 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3349 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3352 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3353 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3356 - In a ts_8 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3522 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3526 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3527 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3530 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3531 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3537 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3538 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3539 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3540 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3541 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3542 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3543 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3544 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3545 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - NumberDowncastError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3546 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3547 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3548 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Failed to downcast number., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3553 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3554 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3555 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3556 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3557 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3558 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3559 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3560 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3561 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3562 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3563 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3564 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3569 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3570 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3572 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3573 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3574 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3575 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3576 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Exceeded maximum token limit., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError", error_code_number: 6030, error_msg: "Multiplication with shift right overflow.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3577 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3578 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3579 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3580 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3585 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3586 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3587 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3589 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3590 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3591 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3593 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3594 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3595 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^110 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Test case expected error - Multiplication with shift right overflow., but received - AnchorError { error_name: "TokenLimitExceededError", error_code_number: 6017, error_msg: "Exceeded maximum token limit.", error_origin: None, compared_values: None }
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3602 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3603 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3606 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3607 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3610 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3611 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at near max tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3617 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3621 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3624 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3625 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3628 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at near min tick with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3633 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3634 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3637 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3638 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3641 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3642 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 0 (p = 1) with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3650 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3651 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3654 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3655 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+12 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3658 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenB to tokenA at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3659 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenA to exactly 1e+9 tokenB at tick 223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - MultiplicationShiftRightOverflowError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3665 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1.8446744073709551615e+19 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3669 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+12 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3672 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+12 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3673 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap exactly 1e+9 tokenA to tokenB at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Test case 3676 - In a ts_128 pool with 2^64 liquidity, swap tokenB to exactly 1e+9 tokenA at tick -223027 with 0.00%/0 fee
[INFO] [stdout] Fail - results do not equal.
[INFO] [stdout] Test case received no error but expected error - TokenLimitExceededError
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] Total - 3840, Pass - 2964, Failed - 876
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] thread 'tests::swap_integration_tests::run_swap_integration_tests' (325) panicked at programs/ai_dex/src/tests/swap_integration_tests.rs:235:5:
[INFO] [stdout] assertion `left == right` failed
[INFO] [stdout]   left: 3840
[INFO] [stdout]  right: 2964
[INFO] [stdout] stack backtrace:
[INFO] [stdout]    0:     0x5d09e42390e2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::backtrace_rs::backtrace::libunwind::trace
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/../../backtrace/src/backtrace/libunwind.rs:117:9
[INFO] [stdout]    1:     0x5d09e42390e2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::backtrace_rs::backtrace::trace_unsynchronized::<std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::sys::backtrace::_print_fmt::{closure#1}>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/../../backtrace/src/backtrace/mod.rs:66:14
[INFO] [stdout]    2:     0x5d09e42390e2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::sys::backtrace::_print_fmt
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/sys/backtrace.rs:74:9
[INFO] [stdout]    3:     0x5d09e42390e2 - <<std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::sys::backtrace::BacktraceLock>::print::DisplayBacktrace as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::fmt::Display>::fmt
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/sys/backtrace.rs:44:26
[INFO] [stdout]    4:     0x5d09e424f7da - <core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::fmt::rt::Argument>::fmt
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/fmt/rt.rs:152:76
[INFO] [stdout]    5:     0x5d09e424f7da - core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::fmt::write
[INFO] [stdout]    6:     0x5d09e423e2f6 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::io::default_write_fmt::<alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::vec::Vec<u8>>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/io/mod.rs:639:11
[INFO] [stdout]    7:     0x5d09e423e2f6 - <alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::vec::Vec<u8> as std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::io::Write>::write_fmt
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/io/mod.rs:1994:13
[INFO] [stdout]    8:     0x5d09e421638f - <std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::sys::backtrace::BacktraceLock>::print
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/sys/backtrace.rs:47:9
[INFO] [stdout]    9:     0x5d09e421638f - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::default_hook::{closure#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:292:27
[INFO] [stdout]   10:     0x5d09e4230ea9 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::default_hook
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:316:9
[INFO] [stdout]   11:     0x5d09e41001ce - <alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::boxed::Box<dyn for<'a, 'b> core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::Fn<(&'a std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panic::PanicHookInfo<'b>,), Output = ()> + core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::marker::Sync + core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::marker::Send> as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::Fn<(&std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panic::PanicHookInfo,)>>::call
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/alloc/src/boxed.rs:2220:9
[INFO] [stdout]   12:     0x5d09e41001ce - test[30224e0cb089acd2]::test_main_with_exit_callback::<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::test_main::{closure#0}>::{closure#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/test/src/lib.rs:145:21
[INFO] [stdout]   13:     0x5d09e4231062 - <alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::boxed::Box<dyn for<'a, 'b> core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::Fn<(&'a std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panic::PanicHookInfo<'b>,), Output = ()> + core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::marker::Sync + core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::marker::Send> as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::Fn<(&std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panic::PanicHookInfo,)>>::call
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/alloc/src/boxed.rs:2220:9
[INFO] [stdout]   14:     0x5d09e4231062 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::panic_with_hook
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:833:13
[INFO] [stdout]   15:     0x5d09e4216448 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::panic_handler::{closure#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:698:13
[INFO] [stdout]   16:     0x5d09e420b429 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::sys::backtrace::__rust_end_short_backtrace::<std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::panic_handler::{closure#0}, !>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/sys/backtrace.rs:182:18
[INFO] [stdout]   17:     0x5d09e421729d - __rustc[caa99d26c7bae192]::rust_begin_unwind
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:689:5
[INFO] [stdout]   18:     0x5d09e424ff1c - core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panicking::panic_fmt
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/panicking.rs:80:14
[INFO] [stdout]   19:     0x5d09e424fdd3 - core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panicking::assert_failed_inner
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/panicking.rs:439:17
[INFO] [stdout]   20:     0x5d09e40e24c3 - core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panicking::assert_failed::<u16, u16>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/panicking.rs:394:5
[INFO] [stdout]   21:     0x5d09e404e75a - ai_dex[bb6ae85f3b26a970]::tests::swap_integration_tests::run_swap_integration_tests
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /opt/rustwide/workdir/programs/ai_dex/src/tests/swap_integration_tests.rs:235:5
[INFO] [stdout]   22:     0x5d09e4043867 - ai_dex[bb6ae85f3b26a970]::tests::swap_integration_tests::run_swap_integration_tests::{closure#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /opt/rustwide/workdir/programs/ai_dex/src/tests/swap_integration_tests.rs:82:32
[INFO] [stdout]   23:     0x5d09e408b186 - <ai_dex[bb6ae85f3b26a970]::tests::swap_integration_tests::run_swap_integration_tests::{closure#0} as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
[INFO] [stdout]   24:     0x5d09e40f457b - <fn() -> core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::result::Result<(), alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::string::String> as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
[INFO] [stdout]   25:     0x5d09e40f457b - test[30224e0cb089acd2]::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::result::Result<(), alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::string::String>, fn() -> core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::result::Result<(), alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::string::String>>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/test/src/lib.rs:663:18
[INFO] [stdout]   26:     0x5d09e4100dda - test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test_in_process::{closure#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/test/src/lib.rs:686:74
[INFO] [stdout]   27:     0x5d09e4100dda - <core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test_in_process::{closure#0}> as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs:274:9
[INFO] [stdout]   28:     0x5d09e4100dda - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::catch_unwind::do_call::<core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test_in_process::{closure#0}>, core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::result::Result<(), alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::string::String>>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:581:40
[INFO] [stdout]   29:     0x5d09e4100dda - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::catch_unwind::<core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::result::Result<(), alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::string::String>, core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test_in_process::{closure#0}>>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:544:19
[INFO] [stdout]   30:     0x5d09e4100dda - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panic::catch_unwind::<core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test_in_process::{closure#0}>, core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::result::Result<(), alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::string::String>>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panic.rs:359:14
[INFO] [stdout]   31:     0x5d09e4100dda - test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test_in_process
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/test/src/lib.rs:686:27
[INFO] [stdout]   32:     0x5d09e4100dda - test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/test/src/lib.rs:607:43
[INFO] [stdout]   33:     0x5d09e40fb2a4 - test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/test/src/lib.rs:637:41
[INFO] [stdout]   34:     0x5d09e40fb2a4 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::sys::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/sys/backtrace.rs:166:18
[INFO] [stdout]   35:     0x5d09e41038d2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked::<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1}::{closure#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/thread/lifecycle.rs:91:13
[INFO] [stdout]   36:     0x5d09e41038d2 - <core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1}::{closure#0}> as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs:274:9
[INFO] [stdout]   37:     0x5d09e41038d2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::catch_unwind::do_call::<core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1}::{closure#0}>, ()>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:581:40
[INFO] [stdout]   38:     0x5d09e41038d2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panicking::catch_unwind::<(), core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1}::{closure#0}>>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panicking.rs:544:19
[INFO] [stdout]   39:     0x5d09e41038d2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::panic::catch_unwind::<core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1}::{closure#0}>, ()>
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/panic.rs:359:14
[INFO] [stdout]   40:     0x5d09e41038d2 - std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked::<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/thread/lifecycle.rs:89:26
[INFO] [stdout]   41:     0x5d09e41038d2 - <std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked<test[30224e0cb089acd2]::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1} as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once::{shim:vtable#0}
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
[INFO] [stdout]   42:     0x5d09e42385ef - <alloc[15e7b27aba85d2e2]::boxed::Box<dyn core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::FnOnce<(), Output = ()> + core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::marker::Send> as core[585f66e14d78f9ba]::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/alloc/src/boxed.rs:2206:9
[INFO] [stdout]   43:     0x5d09e42385ef - <std[3f03f8b59f91bef1]::sys::thread::unix::Thread>::new::thread_start
[INFO] [stdout]                                at /rustc/db823df02fd0c2cf67b43025ac3fef3f2d743245/library/std/src/sys/thread/unix.rs:119:17
[INFO] [stdout]   44:     0x78791e940aa4 - <unknown>
[INFO] [stdout]   45:     0x78791e9cda64 - clone
[INFO] [stdout]   46:                0x0 - <unknown>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] failures:
[INFO] [stdout]     tests::swap_integration_tests::run_swap_integration_tests
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] test result: FAILED. 319 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 4.22s
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "ed45242973dd10b1b6de8c0f61a4f108d64f467bebdccd606c57369a958b1ccf", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "ed45242973dd10b1b6de8c0f61a4f108d64f467bebdccd606c57369a958b1ccf", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] ed45242973dd10b1b6de8c0f61a4f108d64f467bebdccd606c57369a958b1ccf
