[INFO] fetching crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1...
[INFO] checking rgb-lightning-0.0.1 against try#4f260f0f20b3133d20cfb50353c0221943af5796+rustflags=-Dunmustuse_in_always_ok for pr-148577
[INFO] extracting crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1 into /workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source
[INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1
[INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1
[INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1 written to /workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source/Cargo.toml
[INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1 on toolchain 4f260f0f20b3133d20cfb50353c0221943af5796
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4f260f0f20b3133d20cfb50353c0221943af5796" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4f260f0f20b3133d20cfb50353c0221943af5796" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]     Updating crates.io index
[INFO] [stderr]      Locking 29 packages to latest compatible versions
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding bitcoin v0.29.2 (available: v0.32.7)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding core2 v0.3.3 (available: v0.4.0)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding hashbrown v0.8.2 (available: v0.16.0)
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4f260f0f20b3133d20cfb50353c0221943af5796" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:4848fb76d95f26979359cc7e45710b1dbc8f3acb7aeedee7c460d7702230f228" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4f260f0f20b3133d20cfb50353c0221943af5796" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 4025f223c106fdea2c6d7717f81a9c5732d623eaae97ecd38a9c1cebf6fc0b37
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "4025f223c106fdea2c6d7717f81a9c5732d623eaae97ecd38a9c1cebf6fc0b37", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "4025f223c106fdea2c6d7717f81a9c5732d623eaae97ecd38a9c1cebf6fc0b37", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "4025f223c106fdea2c6d7717f81a9c5732d623eaae97ecd38a9c1cebf6fc0b37", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 4025f223c106fdea2c6d7717f81a9c5732d623eaae97ecd38a9c1cebf6fc0b37
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid -Dunmustuse_in_always_ok" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:4848fb76d95f26979359cc7e45710b1dbc8f3acb7aeedee7c460d7702230f228" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4f260f0f20b3133d20cfb50353c0221943af5796" "check" "--frozen" "--all" "--all-targets" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] b3b872044691012d7b28a26177cd10e05bfaeb653876dc61e73906353ab7ee64
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "b3b872044691012d7b28a26177cd10e05bfaeb653876dc61e73906353ab7ee64", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking bitcoin_hashes v0.11.0
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking bech32 v0.9.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitcoinconsensus v0.20.2-0.5.0
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking secp256k1 v0.24.3
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking bitcoin v0.29.2
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking rgb-lightning v0.0.1 (/opt/rustwide/workdir)
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:40:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 40 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), deny(missing_docs))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:41:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), forbid(unsafe_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:63:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 | #[cfg(all(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:73:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 73 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))] extern crate regex;
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:72:22
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 72 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:495:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 495 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:32:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 32 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:34:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:36:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:54:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 54 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:59:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:18:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:31:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:37:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 37 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:39:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:224:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 224 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:244:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 244 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:337:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 337 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:940:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 940 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/events.rs:1119:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1119 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/wakers.rs:199:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 199 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20.rs:14:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:275:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 275 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:300:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 300 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:41:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:96:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 96 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:17:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:155:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 155 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:258:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 258 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:327:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:22:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:98:12
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 98 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:101:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 101 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:111:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 111 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:124:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 124 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:126:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 126 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:131:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 131 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:398:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:406:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 406 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:481:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 481 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:491:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 491 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:659:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |                 #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:661:25
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 661 |                 #[cfg(not(any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:745:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 745 |     #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:761:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 761 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:46:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:55:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 55 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:269:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 269 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:857:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 857 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:868:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 868 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:2402:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2402 |         #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3397:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3397 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3400:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3400 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:344:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 344 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:812:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 812 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:27:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:30:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 30 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:35:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:47:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 47 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:177:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 177 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:189:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 189 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:211:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 211 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:250:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 250 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:410:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 410 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:446:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 446 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:1048:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1048 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:431:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 431 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:507:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 507 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:542:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 542 |             #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:544:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 544 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:554:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 554 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:677:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 677 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:814:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 814 |                                 #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:848:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 848 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:924:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 924 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:29:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:659:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:756:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 756 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:36:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:38:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:41:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:43:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 43 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1011:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1011 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: `#[warn(renamed_and_removed_lints)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1017:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1017 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:3646:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3646 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5455:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5455 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5809:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5809 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1651:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 |             if cfg!(fuzzing) { // fuzzing chacha20 doesn't use the key at all so we always get the same alias
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1727:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1727 |                 if cfg!(fuzzing) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1053:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1053 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1055:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1055 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1984:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1984 |     #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |            ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:787:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 787 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channel.rs:50:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 50 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, debug_assertions))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:458:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 458 | #[cfg(any(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:460:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 460 | #[cfg(not(any(fuzzing, test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:747:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 747 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:695:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 695 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:697:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 697 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:709:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 709 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1064:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1064 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1066:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1066 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1076:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1076 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1412:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1412 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1414:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1414 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1424:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1424 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1910:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1910 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1855:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1855 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1906:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1885:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1885 |                             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2008:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2008 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2026:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2026 |                             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2666:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2666 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2750:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2750 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3040:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3040 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3347:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3347 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4948:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4948 |                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4996:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4996 |                                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5008:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5008 |                                         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5763:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5763 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6265:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6265 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6267:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6267 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6553:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6553 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6555:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6555 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6763:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6763 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6765:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6765 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6776:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6776 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:289:36
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 289 | #[cfg(any(feature = "_test_utils", fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1888:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1888 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `channels`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1906:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `nodes`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:144:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 144 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:755:56
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 755 |     #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:776:57
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 776 |         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:139:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 139 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:141:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:166:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:186:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 186 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:191:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 191 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:194:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 194 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:212:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 212 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:219:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 219 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:228:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 228 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:235:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 235 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:238:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 238 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:246:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 246 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:254:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 254 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:393:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 393 |                 #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unused import: `RwLockWriteGuard`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:188:82
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 188 |     pub use ::std::sync::{Arc, Mutex, Condvar, MutexGuard, RwLock, RwLockReadGuard, RwLockWriteGuard};
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(unused_imports)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:40:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 40 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), deny(missing_docs))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:41:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), forbid(unsafe_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:63:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 | #[cfg(all(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:73:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 73 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))] extern crate regex;
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:72:22
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 72 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:495:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 495 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:32:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 32 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:34:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:36:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:54:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 54 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:59:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:18:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:31:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:37:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 37 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:39:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:224:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 224 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:244:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 244 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:337:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 337 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:940:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 940 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/events.rs:1119:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1119 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/wakers.rs:199:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 199 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20.rs:14:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:275:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 275 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:300:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 300 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:41:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:96:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 96 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:17:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:155:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 155 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:258:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 258 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:327:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:22:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:98:12
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 98 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:101:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 101 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:111:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 111 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:124:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 124 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:126:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 126 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:131:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 131 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:26:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:195:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 195 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |               #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:171:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 171 |               let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ___________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 172 | |                 &sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 173 | |                     0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, sighash_type,
[INFO] [stdout] 174 | |                 ).unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 175 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |               #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:171:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 171 |               let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ___________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 172 | |                 &sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 173 | |                     0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, sighash_type,
[INFO] [stdout] 174 | |                 ).unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 175 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:398:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:406:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 406 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:481:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 481 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:491:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 491 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:659:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |                 #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:661:25
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 661 |                 #[cfg(not(any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:745:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 745 |     #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:761:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 761 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:838:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 838 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:841:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 841 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:846:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 846 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:849:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 849 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:46:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:55:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 55 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:269:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 269 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:857:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 857 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:868:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 868 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:2402:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2402 |         #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3397:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3397 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3400:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3400 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4328:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4328 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4328:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4328 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4360:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4360 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4360:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4360 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4390:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4390 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4390:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4390 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:344:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 344 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:812:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 812 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:27:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:30:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 30 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:35:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:47:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 47 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:177:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 177 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:189:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 189 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:211:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 211 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:250:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 250 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:410:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 410 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:446:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 446 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:1048:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1048 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:431:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 431 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:507:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 507 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:542:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 542 |             #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:544:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 544 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:554:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 554 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:677:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 677 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:814:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 814 |                                 #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:848:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 848 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:924:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 924 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:29:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:659:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:756:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 756 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:36:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:38:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:41:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:43:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 43 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1011:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1011 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: `#[warn(renamed_and_removed_lints)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1017:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1017 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:3646:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3646 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5455:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5455 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5809:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5809 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1651:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 |             if cfg!(fuzzing) { // fuzzing chacha20 doesn't use the key at all so we always get the same alias
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1727:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1727 |                 if cfg!(fuzzing) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1053:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1053 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1055:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1055 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1984:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1984 |     #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |            ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:787:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 787 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channel.rs:50:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 50 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, debug_assertions))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:458:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 458 | #[cfg(any(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:460:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 460 | #[cfg(not(any(fuzzing, test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:747:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 747 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:695:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 695 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:697:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 697 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:709:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 709 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1064:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1064 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1066:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1066 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1076:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1076 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1412:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1412 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1414:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1414 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1424:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1424 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1910:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1910 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1855:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1855 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1906:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1885:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1885 |                             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2008:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2008 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2026:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2026 |                             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2666:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2666 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2750:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2750 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3040:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3040 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3347:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3347 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4948:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4948 |                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4996:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4996 |                                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5008:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5008 |                                         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5763:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5763 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6265:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6265 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6267:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6267 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6553:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6553 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6555:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6555 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6763:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6763 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6765:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6765 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6776:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6776 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:289:36
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 289 | #[cfg(any(feature = "_test_utils", fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs:497:47
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 497 |     let signature = Secp256k1::new().sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &nodes[1].keys_manager.get_node_secret(Recipient::Node).un...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                  ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs:497:47
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 497 |     let signature = Secp256k1::new().sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &nodes[1].keys_manager.get_node_secret(Recipient::Node).un...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                  ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1888:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1888 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `channels`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1906:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `nodes`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2004:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2004 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2004:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2004 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2028:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2028 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2028:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2028 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2059:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2059 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_channel_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2059:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2059 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_channel_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2095:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2095 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2095:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2095 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2345:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2345 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2345:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2345 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:144:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 144 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:755:56
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 755 |     #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:776:57
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 776 |         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2147:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2147 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5096:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5096 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5115:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5115 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `require_route_graph_test`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5642:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5642 |         #[cfg(require_route_graph_test)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(require_route_graph_test)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(require_route_graph_test)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `require_route_graph_test`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5644:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5644 |         #[cfg(not(require_route_graph_test))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(require_route_graph_test)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(require_route_graph_test)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:139:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 139 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:141:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:166:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:186:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 186 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:191:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 191 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:194:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 194 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:212:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 212 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:219:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 219 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:228:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 228 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:235:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 235 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:238:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 238 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:246:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 246 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:254:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 254 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1708:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1708 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1708:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1708 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1741:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1741 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1741:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1741 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:49:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 49 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:49:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 49 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:78:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 78 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:78:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 78 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:94:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 94 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   -------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:94:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 94 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   -------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:393:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 393 |                 #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: variable does not need to be mutable
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:841:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 841 |             let mut cur_hop = &mut self.hops.get_mut(i).unwrap().0;
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ----^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 help: remove this `mut`
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(unused_mut)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: struct `Eternity` is never constructed
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/time.rs:33:12
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 33 | pub struct Eternity;
[INFO] [stdout]    |            ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/wakers.rs:58:43
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 58 |     fn propagate_future_state_to_notify_flag(&self) -> MutexGuard<(bool, Option<Arc<Mutex<FutureState>>>)> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                              ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                              |
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 58 |     fn propagate_future_state_to_notify_flag(&self) -> MutexGuard<'_, (bool, Option<Arc<Mutex<FutureState>>>)> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                                                   +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fairrwlock.rs:28:15
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 28 |     pub fn write(&self) -> LockResult<RwLockWriteGuard<T>> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                  ^^^^^                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]    |                  |
[INFO] [stdout]    |                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 28 |     pub fn write(&self) -> LockResult<RwLockWriteGuard<'_, T>> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                                        +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fairrwlock.rs:35:14
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 |     pub fn read(&self) -> LockResult<RwLockReadGuard<T>> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 |
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 |     pub fn read(&self) -> LockResult<RwLockReadGuard<'_, T>> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                                      +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:852:33
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 852 |     pub fn as_holder_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 852 |     pub fn as_holder_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                  ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:864:39
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 864 |     pub fn as_counterparty_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 864 |     pub fn as_counterparty_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1127:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1127 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedClosingTransaction {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1127 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedClosingTransaction<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1137:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1137 |     pub fn verify(&self, funding_outpoint: OutPoint) -> Result<TrustedClosingTransaction, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1137 |     pub fn verify(&self, funding_outpoint: OutPoint) -> Result<TrustedClosingTransaction<'_>, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1490:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1490 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1490 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1500:65
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1500 | ...n>(&self, channel_parameters: &DirectedChannelTransactionParameters, broadcaster_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, countersignatory_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<TrustedCommitmentTransaction, (...
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here                                                                                                                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1500 |     pub fn verify<T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, channel_parameters: &DirectedChannelTransactionParameters, broadcaster_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, countersignatory_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'_>, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1448:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1448 | ...ref>(&self, commitment_number: u64, keys: &TxCreationKeys, local: bool, generated_by_local: bool, logger: &L) -> CommitmentStats
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here                                                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1448 |     fn build_commitment_transaction<L: Deref>(&self, commitment_number: u64, keys: &TxCreationKeys, local: bool, generated_by_local: bool, logger: &L) -> CommitmentStats<'_>
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                                                                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:307:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 307 |     pub fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 307 |     pub fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                       ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:334:30
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 334 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 334 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                            ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:303:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 303 |     pub fn description(&self) -> PrintableString {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 303 |     pub fn description(&self) -> PrintableString<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                 ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:333:16
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 333 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 333 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                   ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:379:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 379 |         &self, metadata: Vec<u8>, payer_id: PublicKey
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] 380 |     ) -> Result<InvoiceRequestBuilder, SemanticError> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 380 |     ) -> Result<InvoiceRequestBuilder<'_>, SemanticError> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                      ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:476:30
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 476 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> OfferTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 476 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> OfferTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                            ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/gossip.rs:740:24
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 740 |     pub fn as_directed_to(&self, target: &NodeId) -> Option<(DirectedChannelInfo, &NodeId)> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           |                                  |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           the lifetime is elided here        the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 740 |     pub fn as_directed_to(&self, target: &NodeId) -> Option<(DirectedChannelInfo<'_>, &NodeId)> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                 ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/gossip.rs:755:26
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 755 |     pub fn as_directed_from(&self, source: &NodeId) -> Option<(DirectedChannelInfo, &NodeId)> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                             ^^^^^                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                             |                                  |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                             the lifetime is elided here        the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 755 |     pub fn as_directed_from(&self, source: &NodeId) -> Option<(DirectedChannelInfo<'_>, &NodeId)> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                   ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: value assigned to `fee_est` is never read
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6932:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6932 |         fee_est.fee_est = 500;
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: maybe it is overwritten before being read?
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: `#[warn(unused_assignments)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: variable does not need to be mutable
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:841:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 841 |             let mut cur_hop = &mut self.hops.get_mut(i).unwrap().0;
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ----^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 help: remove this `mut`
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(unused_mut)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: fields `channel_value_msat` and `pending_inbound_htlcs_amount_msat` are never read
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channel.rs:57:6
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 55 | pub struct ChannelValueStat {
[INFO] [stdout]    |            ---------------- fields in this struct
[INFO] [stdout] 56 |     pub value_to_self_msat: u64,
[INFO] [stdout] 57 |     pub channel_value_msat: u64,
[INFO] [stdout]    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 60 |     pub pending_inbound_htlcs_amount_msat: u64,
[INFO] [stdout]    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: struct `Keys` is never constructed
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6851:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6851 |     struct Keys {
[INFO] [stdout]      |            ^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/wakers.rs:58:43
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 58 |     fn propagate_future_state_to_notify_flag(&self) -> MutexGuard<(bool, Option<Arc<Mutex<FutureState>>>)> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                              ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                              |
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 58 |     fn propagate_future_state_to_notify_flag(&self) -> MutexGuard<'_, (bool, Option<Arc<Mutex<FutureState>>>)> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                                                   +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:88:31
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 88 |     pub fn get_enforcement_state(&self) -> MutexGuard<EnforcementState> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                  ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                  |
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 88 |     pub fn get_enforcement_state(&self) -> MutexGuard<'_, EnforcementState> {
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                                       +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:852:33
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 852 |     pub fn as_holder_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 852 |     pub fn as_holder_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                  ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:864:39
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 864 |     pub fn as_counterparty_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 864 |     pub fn as_counterparty_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1127:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1127 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedClosingTransaction {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1127 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedClosingTransaction<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1137:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1137 |     pub fn verify(&self, funding_outpoint: OutPoint) -> Result<TrustedClosingTransaction, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1137 |     pub fn verify(&self, funding_outpoint: OutPoint) -> Result<TrustedClosingTransaction<'_>, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1490:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1490 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1490 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1500:65
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1500 | ...n>(&self, channel_parameters: &DirectedChannelTransactionParameters, broadcaster_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, countersignatory_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<TrustedCommitmentTransaction, (...
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here                                                                                                                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1500 |     pub fn verify<T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, channel_parameters: &DirectedChannelTransactionParameters, broadcaster_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, countersignatory_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'_>, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1448:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1448 | ...ref>(&self, commitment_number: u64, keys: &TxCreationKeys, local: bool, generated_by_local: bool, logger: &L) -> CommitmentStats
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here                                                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1448 |     fn build_commitment_transaction<L: Deref>(&self, commitment_number: u64, keys: &TxCreationKeys, local: bool, generated_by_local: bool, logger: &L) -> CommitmentStats<'_>
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                                                                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: using `.clone()` on a double reference, which returns `&dyn BroadcasterInterface` instead of cloning the inner type
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/reload_tests.rs:373:108
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 373 |     new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estima...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                                               ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(suspicious_double_ref_op)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: call to `.clone()` on a reference in this situation does nothing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/reload_tests.rs:400:42
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 400 |         tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(),
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: the type `TestBroadcaster` does not implement `Clone`, so calling `clone` on `&TestBroadcaster` copies the reference, which does not do anything and can be removed
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(noop_method_call)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] help: remove this redundant call
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 400 -         tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(),
[INFO] [stdout] 400 +         tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster,
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] help: if you meant to clone `TestBroadcaster`, implement `Clone` for it
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/test_utils.rs:234:1
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 234 + #[derive(Clone)]
[INFO] [stdout] 235 | pub struct TestBroadcaster {
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: call to `.clone()` on a reference in this situation does nothing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/reload_tests.rs:414:42
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 414 |         tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(),
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: the type `TestBroadcaster` does not implement `Clone`, so calling `clone` on `&TestBroadcaster` copies the reference, which does not do anything and can be removed
[INFO] [stdout] help: remove this redundant call
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 414 -         tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(),
[INFO] [stdout] 414 +         tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster,
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] help: if you meant to clone `TestBroadcaster`, implement `Clone` for it
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/test_utils.rs:234:1
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 234 + #[derive(Clone)]
[INFO] [stdout] 235 | pub struct TestBroadcaster {
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:307:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 307 |     pub fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 307 |     pub fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                       ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:319:19
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 319 |     fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                      ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                      |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                      the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 319 |     fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                              ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:334:30
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 334 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 334 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                            ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this type will no longer be must used: Result<bitcoin::secp256k1::schnorr::Signature, Infallible>
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:497:67
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 497 |       fn payer_sign(digest: &Message) -> Result<Signature, Infallible> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ______________________________________________________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 498 | |         let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
[INFO] [stdout] 499 | |         let keys = KeyPair::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
[INFO] [stdout] 500 | |         Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(digest, &keys))
[INFO] [stdout] 501 | |     }
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: requested on the command line with `-D unmustuse-in-always-ok`
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this type will no longer be must used: Result<bitcoin::secp256k1::schnorr::Signature, Infallible>
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:500:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 500 |         Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(digest, &keys))
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this type will no longer be must used: Result<bitcoin::secp256k1::schnorr::Signature, Infallible>
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:507:71
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 507 |       fn recipient_sign(digest: &Message) -> Result<Signature, Infallible> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________________________________________________________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 508 | |         let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
[INFO] [stdout] 509 | |         let keys = KeyPair::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[43; 32]).unwrap());
[INFO] [stdout] 510 | |         Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(digest, &keys))
[INFO] [stdout] 511 | |     }
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this type will no longer be must used: Result<bitcoin::secp256k1::schnorr::Signature, Infallible>
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:510:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 510 |         Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(digest, &keys))
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this type will no longer be must used: Result<bitcoin::secp256k1::schnorr::Signature, Infallible>
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:1262:36
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1262 |             .sign::<_, Infallible>(|digest| Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(digest, &keys)))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this type will no longer be must used: Result<bitcoin::secp256k1::schnorr::Signature, Infallible>
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/merkle.rs:245:36
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 245 |             .sign::<_, Infallible>(|digest| Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(digest, &payer_keys)))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:303:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 303 |     pub fn description(&self) -> PrintableString {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 303 |     pub fn description(&self) -> PrintableString<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                 ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:333:16
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 333 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 333 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                   ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:379:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 379 |         &self, metadata: Vec<u8>, payer_id: PublicKey
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] 380 |     ) -> Result<InvoiceRequestBuilder, SemanticError> {
[WARN] too many lines in the log, truncating it
