[INFO] fetching crate unin 0.0.1... [INFO] testing unin-0.0.1 against try#b83b707f97d809763b7861afa7638871f3339a33 for pr-145838-1 [INFO] extracting crate unin 0.0.1 into /workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source [INFO] removed /workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source/rust-toolchain [INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate unin 0.0.1 [INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate unin 0.0.1 [INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate unin 0.0.1 written to /workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source/Cargo.toml [INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate unin 0.0.1 on toolchain b83b707f97d809763b7861afa7638871f3339a33 [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b83b707f97d809763b7861afa7638871f3339a33" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b83b707f97d809763b7861afa7638871f3339a33" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Updating crates.io index [INFO] [stderr] Locking 9 packages to latest compatible versions [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b83b707f97d809763b7861afa7638871f3339a33" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:7ad1b28ee6f5f7f699f6cf7015098d6ccdd96d6f2d78dd06228f5b4c9faf309c" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b83b707f97d809763b7861afa7638871f3339a33" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 8dfc108873946e41c3ed8f77b8b89a528bf22567af4126c398ada83628881005 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "8dfc108873946e41c3ed8f77b8b89a528bf22567af4126c398ada83628881005", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "8dfc108873946e41c3ed8f77b8b89a528bf22567af4126c398ada83628881005", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "8dfc108873946e41c3ed8f77b8b89a528bf22567af4126c398ada83628881005", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 8dfc108873946e41c3ed8f77b8b89a528bf22567af4126c398ada83628881005 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:7ad1b28ee6f5f7f699f6cf7015098d6ccdd96d6f2d78dd06228f5b4c9faf309c" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b83b707f97d809763b7861afa7638871f3339a33" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] f5e98ce18c6c3203d6bc762522f934897a1a07e6b55fde151751c9ef6bd76a2c [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "f5e98ce18c6c3203d6bc762522f934897a1a07e6b55fde151751c9ef6bd76a2c", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Compiling unin v0.0.1 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 565 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 1-bit unsigned integer type."], u1, 1, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 565 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 1-bit unsigned integer type."], u1, 1, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 565 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 1-bit unsigned integer type."], u1, 1, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 565 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 1-bit unsigned integer type."], u1, 1, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 566 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 2-bit unsigned integer type."], u2, 2, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 566 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 2-bit unsigned integer type."], u2, 2, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 566 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 2-bit unsigned integer type."], u2, 2, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 566 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 2-bit unsigned integer type."], u2, 2, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 567 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 3-bit unsigned integer type."], u3, 3, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 567 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 3-bit unsigned integer type."], u3, 3, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 567 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 3-bit unsigned integer type."], u3, 3, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 567 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 3-bit unsigned integer type."], u3, 3, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 568 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 4-bit unsigned integer type."], u4, 4, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 568 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 4-bit unsigned integer type."], u4, 4, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 568 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 4-bit unsigned integer type."], u4, 4, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 568 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 4-bit unsigned integer type."], u4, 4, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 569 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 5-bit unsigned integer type."], u5, 5, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 569 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 5-bit unsigned integer type."], u5, 5, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 569 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 5-bit unsigned integer type."], u5, 5, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 569 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 5-bit unsigned integer type."], u5, 5, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 570 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 6-bit unsigned integer type."], u6, 6, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 570 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 6-bit unsigned integer type."], u6, 6, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 570 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 6-bit unsigned integer type."], u6, 6, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 570 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 6-bit unsigned integer type."], u6, 6, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 571 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 7-bit unsigned integer type."], u7, 7, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 571 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 7-bit unsigned integer type."], u7, 7, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 571 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 7-bit unsigned integer type."], u7, 7, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 571 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 7-bit unsigned integer type."], u7, 7, u8); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 573 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 9-bit unsigned integer type."], u9, 9, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 573 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 9-bit unsigned integer type."], u9, 9, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 573 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 9-bit unsigned integer type."], u9, 9, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 573 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 9-bit unsigned integer type."], u9, 9, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 574 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 10-bit unsigned integer type."], u10, 10, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 574 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 10-bit unsigned integer type."], u10, 10, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 574 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 10-bit unsigned integer type."], u10, 10, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 574 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 10-bit unsigned integer type."], u10, 10, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 575 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 11-bit unsigned integer type."], u11, 11, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 575 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 11-bit unsigned integer type."], u11, 11, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 575 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 11-bit unsigned integer type."], u11, 11, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 575 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 11-bit unsigned integer type."], u11, 11, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 576 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 12-bit unsigned integer type."], u12, 12, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 576 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 12-bit unsigned integer type."], u12, 12, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 576 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 12-bit unsigned integer type."], u12, 12, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 576 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 12-bit unsigned integer type."], u12, 12, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 577 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 13-bit unsigned integer type."], u13, 13, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 577 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 13-bit unsigned integer type."], u13, 13, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 577 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 13-bit unsigned integer type."], u13, 13, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 577 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 13-bit unsigned integer type."], u13, 13, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 578 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 14-bit unsigned integer type."], u14, 14, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 578 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 14-bit unsigned integer type."], u14, 14, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 578 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 14-bit unsigned integer type."], u14, 14, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 578 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 14-bit unsigned integer type."], u14, 14, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 579 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 15-bit unsigned integer type."], u15, 15, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 579 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 15-bit unsigned integer type."], u15, 15, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 579 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 15-bit unsigned integer type."], u15, 15, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 579 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 15-bit unsigned integer type."], u15, 15, u16); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 581 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 17-bit unsigned integer type."], u17, 17, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 581 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 17-bit unsigned integer type."], u17, 17, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 581 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 17-bit unsigned integer type."], u17, 17, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 581 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 17-bit unsigned integer type."], u17, 17, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 582 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 18-bit unsigned integer type."], u18, 18, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 582 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 18-bit unsigned integer type."], u18, 18, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 582 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 18-bit unsigned integer type."], u18, 18, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 582 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 18-bit unsigned integer type."], u18, 18, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 583 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 19-bit unsigned integer type."], u19, 19, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 583 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 19-bit unsigned integer type."], u19, 19, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 583 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 19-bit unsigned integer type."], u19, 19, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 583 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 19-bit unsigned integer type."], u19, 19, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 584 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 20-bit unsigned integer type."], u20, 20, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 584 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 20-bit unsigned integer type."], u20, 20, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 584 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 20-bit unsigned integer type."], u20, 20, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 584 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 20-bit unsigned integer type."], u20, 20, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 585 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 21-bit unsigned integer type."], u21, 21, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 585 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 21-bit unsigned integer type."], u21, 21, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 585 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 21-bit unsigned integer type."], u21, 21, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 585 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 21-bit unsigned integer type."], u21, 21, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 586 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 22-bit unsigned integer type."], u22, 22, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 586 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 22-bit unsigned integer type."], u22, 22, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 586 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 22-bit unsigned integer type."], u22, 22, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 586 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 22-bit unsigned integer type."], u22, 22, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 587 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 23-bit unsigned integer type."], u23, 23, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 587 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 23-bit unsigned integer type."], u23, 23, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 587 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 23-bit unsigned integer type."], u23, 23, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 587 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 23-bit unsigned integer type."], u23, 23, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 588 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 24-bit unsigned integer type."], u24, 24, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 588 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 24-bit unsigned integer type."], u24, 24, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 588 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 24-bit unsigned integer type."], u24, 24, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 588 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 24-bit unsigned integer type."], u24, 24, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 590 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 25-bit unsigned integer type."], u25, 25, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 590 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 25-bit unsigned integer type."], u25, 25, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 590 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 25-bit unsigned integer type."], u25, 25, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 590 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 25-bit unsigned integer type."], u25, 25, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 591 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 26-bit unsigned integer type."], u26, 26, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 591 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 26-bit unsigned integer type."], u26, 26, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 591 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 26-bit unsigned integer type."], u26, 26, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 591 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 26-bit unsigned integer type."], u26, 26, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 592 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 27-bit unsigned integer type."], u27, 27, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 592 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 27-bit unsigned integer type."], u27, 27, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 592 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 27-bit unsigned integer type."], u27, 27, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 592 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 27-bit unsigned integer type."], u27, 27, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 593 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 28-bit unsigned integer type."], u28, 28, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 593 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 28-bit unsigned integer type."], u28, 28, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 593 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 28-bit unsigned integer type."], u28, 28, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 593 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 28-bit unsigned integer type."], u28, 28, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 594 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 29-bit unsigned integer type."], u29, 29, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 594 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 29-bit unsigned integer type."], u29, 29, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 594 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 29-bit unsigned integer type."], u29, 29, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 594 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 29-bit unsigned integer type."], u29, 29, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 595 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 30-bit unsigned integer type."], u30, 30, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 595 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 30-bit unsigned integer type."], u30, 30, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 595 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 30-bit unsigned integer type."], u30, 30, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 595 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 30-bit unsigned integer type."], u30, 30, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 596 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 31-bit unsigned integer type."], u31, 31, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 596 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 31-bit unsigned integer type."], u31, 31, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 596 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 31-bit unsigned integer type."], u31, 31, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 596 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 31-bit unsigned integer type."], u31, 31, u32); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 598 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 33-bit unsigned integer type."], u33, 33, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 598 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 33-bit unsigned integer type."], u33, 33, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 598 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 33-bit unsigned integer type."], u33, 33, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 598 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 33-bit unsigned integer type."], u33, 33, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 599 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 34-bit unsigned integer type."], u34, 34, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 599 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 34-bit unsigned integer type."], u34, 34, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 599 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 34-bit unsigned integer type."], u34, 34, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 599 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 34-bit unsigned integer type."], u34, 34, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 600 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 35-bit unsigned integer type."], u35, 35, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 600 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 35-bit unsigned integer type."], u35, 35, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 600 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 35-bit unsigned integer type."], u35, 35, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 600 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 35-bit unsigned integer type."], u35, 35, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 601 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 36-bit unsigned integer type."], u36, 36, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 601 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 36-bit unsigned integer type."], u36, 36, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 601 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 36-bit unsigned integer type."], u36, 36, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 601 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 36-bit unsigned integer type."], u36, 36, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 602 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 37-bit unsigned integer type."], u37, 37, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 602 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 37-bit unsigned integer type."], u37, 37, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 602 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 37-bit unsigned integer type."], u37, 37, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 602 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 37-bit unsigned integer type."], u37, 37, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 603 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 38-bit unsigned integer type."], u38, 38, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 603 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 38-bit unsigned integer type."], u38, 38, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 603 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 38-bit unsigned integer type."], u38, 38, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 603 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 38-bit unsigned integer type."], u38, 38, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 604 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 39-bit unsigned integer type."], u39, 39, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 604 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 39-bit unsigned integer type."], u39, 39, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 604 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 39-bit unsigned integer type."], u39, 39, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 604 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 39-bit unsigned integer type."], u39, 39, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 605 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 40-bit unsigned integer type."], u40, 40, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 605 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 40-bit unsigned integer type."], u40, 40, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 605 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 40-bit unsigned integer type."], u40, 40, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 605 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 40-bit unsigned integer type."], u40, 40, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 607 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 41-bit unsigned integer type."], u41, 41, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 607 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 41-bit unsigned integer type."], u41, 41, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 607 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 41-bit unsigned integer type."], u41, 41, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 607 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 41-bit unsigned integer type."], u41, 41, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 608 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 42-bit unsigned integer type."], u42, 42, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 608 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 42-bit unsigned integer type."], u42, 42, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 608 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 42-bit unsigned integer type."], u42, 42, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 608 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 42-bit unsigned integer type."], u42, 42, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 609 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 43-bit unsigned integer type."], u43, 43, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 609 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 43-bit unsigned integer type."], u43, 43, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 609 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 43-bit unsigned integer type."], u43, 43, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 609 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 43-bit unsigned integer type."], u43, 43, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 610 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 44-bit unsigned integer type."], u44, 44, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 610 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 44-bit unsigned integer type."], u44, 44, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 610 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 44-bit unsigned integer type."], u44, 44, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 610 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 44-bit unsigned integer type."], u44, 44, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 611 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 45-bit unsigned integer type."], u45, 45, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 611 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 45-bit unsigned integer type."], u45, 45, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 611 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 45-bit unsigned integer type."], u45, 45, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 611 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 45-bit unsigned integer type."], u45, 45, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 612 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 46-bit unsigned integer type."], u46, 46, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 612 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 46-bit unsigned integer type."], u46, 46, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 612 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 46-bit unsigned integer type."], u46, 46, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 612 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 46-bit unsigned integer type."], u46, 46, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 613 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 47-bit unsigned integer type."], u47, 47, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 613 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 47-bit unsigned integer type."], u47, 47, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 613 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 47-bit unsigned integer type."], u47, 47, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 613 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 47-bit unsigned integer type."], u47, 47, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 614 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 48-bit unsigned integer type."], u48, 48, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 614 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 48-bit unsigned integer type."], u48, 48, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 614 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 48-bit unsigned integer type."], u48, 48, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 614 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 48-bit unsigned integer type."], u48, 48, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 616 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 49-bit unsigned integer type."], u49, 49, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 616 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 49-bit unsigned integer type."], u49, 49, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 616 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 49-bit unsigned integer type."], u49, 49, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 616 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 49-bit unsigned integer type."], u49, 49, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 617 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 50-bit unsigned integer type."], u50, 50, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 617 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 50-bit unsigned integer type."], u50, 50, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 617 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 50-bit unsigned integer type."], u50, 50, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 617 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 50-bit unsigned integer type."], u50, 50, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 618 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 51-bit unsigned integer type."], u51, 51, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 618 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 51-bit unsigned integer type."], u51, 51, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 618 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 51-bit unsigned integer type."], u51, 51, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 618 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 51-bit unsigned integer type."], u51, 51, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 619 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 52-bit unsigned integer type."], u52, 52, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 619 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 52-bit unsigned integer type."], u52, 52, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 619 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 52-bit unsigned integer type."], u52, 52, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 619 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 52-bit unsigned integer type."], u52, 52, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 620 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 53-bit unsigned integer type."], u53, 53, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 620 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 53-bit unsigned integer type."], u53, 53, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 620 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 53-bit unsigned integer type."], u53, 53, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 620 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 53-bit unsigned integer type."], u53, 53, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 621 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 54-bit unsigned integer type."], u54, 54, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 621 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 54-bit unsigned integer type."], u54, 54, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 621 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 54-bit unsigned integer type."], u54, 54, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 621 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 54-bit unsigned integer type."], u54, 54, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 622 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 55-bit unsigned integer type."], u55, 55, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 622 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 55-bit unsigned integer type."], u55, 55, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 622 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 55-bit unsigned integer type."], u55, 55, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 622 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 55-bit unsigned integer type."], u55, 55, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 623 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 56-bit unsigned integer type."], u56, 56, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 623 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 56-bit unsigned integer type."], u56, 56, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 623 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 56-bit unsigned integer type."], u56, 56, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 623 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 56-bit unsigned integer type."], u56, 56, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 625 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 57-bit unsigned integer type."], u57, 57, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 625 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 57-bit unsigned integer type."], u57, 57, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 625 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 57-bit unsigned integer type."], u57, 57, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 625 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 57-bit unsigned integer type."], u57, 57, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 626 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 58-bit unsigned integer type."], u58, 58, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 626 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 58-bit unsigned integer type."], u58, 58, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 626 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 58-bit unsigned integer type."], u58, 58, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 626 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 58-bit unsigned integer type."], u58, 58, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 627 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 59-bit unsigned integer type."], u59, 59, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 627 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 59-bit unsigned integer type."], u59, 59, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 627 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 59-bit unsigned integer type."], u59, 59, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 627 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 59-bit unsigned integer type."], u59, 59, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 628 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 60-bit unsigned integer type."], u60, 60, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 628 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 60-bit unsigned integer type."], u60, 60, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 628 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 60-bit unsigned integer type."], u60, 60, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 628 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 60-bit unsigned integer type."], u60, 60, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 629 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 61-bit unsigned integer type."], u61, 61, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 629 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 61-bit unsigned integer type."], u61, 61, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 629 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 61-bit unsigned integer type."], u61, 61, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 629 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 61-bit unsigned integer type."], u61, 61, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 630 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 62-bit unsigned integer type."], u62, 62, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 630 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 62-bit unsigned integer type."], u62, 62, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 630 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 62-bit unsigned integer type."], u62, 62, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 630 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 62-bit unsigned integer type."], u62, 62, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 631 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 63-bit unsigned integer type."], u63, 63, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 631 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 63-bit unsigned integer type."], u63, 63, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 631 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 63-bit unsigned integer type."], u63, 63, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 631 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 63-bit unsigned integer type."], u63, 63, u64); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 633 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 65-bit unsigned integer type."], u65, 65, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 633 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 65-bit unsigned integer type."], u65, 65, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 633 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 65-bit unsigned integer type."], u65, 65, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 633 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 65-bit unsigned integer type."], u65, 65, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 634 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 66-bit unsigned integer type."], u66, 66, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 634 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 66-bit unsigned integer type."], u66, 66, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 634 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 66-bit unsigned integer type."], u66, 66, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 634 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 66-bit unsigned integer type."], u66, 66, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 635 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 67-bit unsigned integer type."], u67, 67, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 635 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 67-bit unsigned integer type."], u67, 67, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 635 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 67-bit unsigned integer type."], u67, 67, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 635 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 67-bit unsigned integer type."], u67, 67, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 636 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 68-bit unsigned integer type."], u68, 68, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 636 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 68-bit unsigned integer type."], u68, 68, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 636 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 68-bit unsigned integer type."], u68, 68, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 636 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 68-bit unsigned integer type."], u68, 68, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 637 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 69-bit unsigned integer type."], u69, 69, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 637 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 69-bit unsigned integer type."], u69, 69, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 637 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 69-bit unsigned integer type."], u69, 69, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 637 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 69-bit unsigned integer type."], u69, 69, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 638 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 70-bit unsigned integer type."], u70, 70, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 638 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 70-bit unsigned integer type."], u70, 70, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 638 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 70-bit unsigned integer type."], u70, 70, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 638 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 70-bit unsigned integer type."], u70, 70, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 639 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 71-bit unsigned integer type."], u71, 71, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 639 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 71-bit unsigned integer type."], u71, 71, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 639 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 71-bit unsigned integer type."], u71, 71, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 639 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 71-bit unsigned integer type."], u71, 71, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 640 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 72-bit unsigned integer type."], u72, 72, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 640 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 72-bit unsigned integer type."], u72, 72, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 640 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 72-bit unsigned integer type."], u72, 72, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 640 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 72-bit unsigned integer type."], u72, 72, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 642 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 73-bit unsigned integer type."], u73, 73, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 642 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 73-bit unsigned integer type."], u73, 73, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 642 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 73-bit unsigned integer type."], u73, 73, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 642 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 73-bit unsigned integer type."], u73, 73, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 643 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 74-bit unsigned integer type."], u74, 74, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 643 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 74-bit unsigned integer type."], u74, 74, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 643 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 74-bit unsigned integer type."], u74, 74, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 643 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 74-bit unsigned integer type."], u74, 74, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 644 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 75-bit unsigned integer type."], u75, 75, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 644 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 75-bit unsigned integer type."], u75, 75, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 644 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 75-bit unsigned integer type."], u75, 75, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 644 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 75-bit unsigned integer type."], u75, 75, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 645 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 76-bit unsigned integer type."], u76, 76, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 645 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 76-bit unsigned integer type."], u76, 76, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 645 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 76-bit unsigned integer type."], u76, 76, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 645 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 76-bit unsigned integer type."], u76, 76, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 646 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 77-bit unsigned integer type."], u77, 77, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 646 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 77-bit unsigned integer type."], u77, 77, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 646 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 77-bit unsigned integer type."], u77, 77, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 646 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 77-bit unsigned integer type."], u77, 77, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 647 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 78-bit unsigned integer type."], u78, 78, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 647 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 78-bit unsigned integer type."], u78, 78, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 647 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 78-bit unsigned integer type."], u78, 78, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 647 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 78-bit unsigned integer type."], u78, 78, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 648 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 79-bit unsigned integer type."], u79, 79, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 648 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 79-bit unsigned integer type."], u79, 79, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 648 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 79-bit unsigned integer type."], u79, 79, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 648 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 79-bit unsigned integer type."], u79, 79, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 649 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 80-bit unsigned integer type."], u80, 80, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 649 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 80-bit unsigned integer type."], u80, 80, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 649 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 80-bit unsigned integer type."], u80, 80, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 649 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 80-bit unsigned integer type."], u80, 80, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 651 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 81-bit unsigned integer type."], u81, 81, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 651 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 81-bit unsigned integer type."], u81, 81, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 651 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 81-bit unsigned integer type."], u81, 81, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 651 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 81-bit unsigned integer type."], u81, 81, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 652 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 82-bit unsigned integer type."], u82, 82, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 652 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 82-bit unsigned integer type."], u82, 82, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 652 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 82-bit unsigned integer type."], u82, 82, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 652 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 82-bit unsigned integer type."], u82, 82, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 653 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 83-bit unsigned integer type."], u83, 83, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 653 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 83-bit unsigned integer type."], u83, 83, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 653 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 83-bit unsigned integer type."], u83, 83, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 653 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 83-bit unsigned integer type."], u83, 83, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 654 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 84-bit unsigned integer type."], u84, 84, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 654 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 84-bit unsigned integer type."], u84, 84, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 654 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 84-bit unsigned integer type."], u84, 84, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 654 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 84-bit unsigned integer type."], u84, 84, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 655 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 85-bit unsigned integer type."], u85, 85, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 655 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 85-bit unsigned integer type."], u85, 85, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 655 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 85-bit unsigned integer type."], u85, 85, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 655 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 85-bit unsigned integer type."], u85, 85, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 656 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 86-bit unsigned integer type."], u86, 86, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 656 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 86-bit unsigned integer type."], u86, 86, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 656 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 86-bit unsigned integer type."], u86, 86, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 656 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 86-bit unsigned integer type."], u86, 86, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 657 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 87-bit unsigned integer type."], u87, 87, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 657 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 87-bit unsigned integer type."], u87, 87, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 657 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 87-bit unsigned integer type."], u87, 87, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 657 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 87-bit unsigned integer type."], u87, 87, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 658 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 88-bit unsigned integer type."], u88, 88, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 658 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 88-bit unsigned integer type."], u88, 88, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 658 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 88-bit unsigned integer type."], u88, 88, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 658 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 88-bit unsigned integer type."], u88, 88, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 660 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 89-bit unsigned integer type."], u89, 89, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 660 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 89-bit unsigned integer type."], u89, 89, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 660 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 89-bit unsigned integer type."], u89, 89, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 660 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 89-bit unsigned integer type."], u89, 89, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 661 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 90-bit unsigned integer type."], u90, 90, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 661 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 90-bit unsigned integer type."], u90, 90, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 661 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 90-bit unsigned integer type."], u90, 90, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 661 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 90-bit unsigned integer type."], u90, 90, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 662 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 91-bit unsigned integer type."], u91, 91, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 662 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 91-bit unsigned integer type."], u91, 91, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 662 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 91-bit unsigned integer type."], u91, 91, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 662 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 91-bit unsigned integer type."], u91, 91, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 663 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 92-bit unsigned integer type."], u92, 92, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 663 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 92-bit unsigned integer type."], u92, 92, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 663 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 92-bit unsigned integer type."], u92, 92, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 663 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 92-bit unsigned integer type."], u92, 92, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 664 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 93-bit unsigned integer type."], u93, 93, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 664 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 93-bit unsigned integer type."], u93, 93, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 664 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 93-bit unsigned integer type."], u93, 93, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 664 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 93-bit unsigned integer type."], u93, 93, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 665 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 94-bit unsigned integer type."], u94, 94, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 665 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 94-bit unsigned integer type."], u94, 94, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 665 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 94-bit unsigned integer type."], u94, 94, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 665 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 94-bit unsigned integer type."], u94, 94, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 666 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 95-bit unsigned integer type."], u95, 95, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 666 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 95-bit unsigned integer type."], u95, 95, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 666 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 95-bit unsigned integer type."], u95, 95, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 666 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 95-bit unsigned integer type."], u95, 95, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 667 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 96-bit unsigned integer type."], u96, 96, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 667 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 96-bit unsigned integer type."], u96, 96, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 667 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 96-bit unsigned integer type."], u96, 96, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 667 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 96-bit unsigned integer type."], u96, 96, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 669 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 97-bit unsigned integer type."], u97, 97, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 669 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 97-bit unsigned integer type."], u97, 97, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 669 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 97-bit unsigned integer type."], u97, 97, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 669 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 97-bit unsigned integer type."], u97, 97, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 670 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 98-bit unsigned integer type."], u98, 98, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 670 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 98-bit unsigned integer type."], u98, 98, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 670 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 98-bit unsigned integer type."], u98, 98, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 670 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 98-bit unsigned integer type."], u98, 98, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 671 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 99-bit unsigned integer type."], u99, 99, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 671 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 99-bit unsigned integer type."], u99, 99, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 671 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 99-bit unsigned integer type."], u99, 99, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 671 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 99-bit unsigned integer type."], u99, 99, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 672 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 100-bit unsigned integer type."], u100, 100, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 672 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 100-bit unsigned integer type."], u100, 100, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 672 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 100-bit unsigned integer type."], u100, 100, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 672 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 100-bit unsigned integer type."], u100, 100, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 673 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 101-bit unsigned integer type."], u101, 101, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 673 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 101-bit unsigned integer type."], u101, 101, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 673 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 101-bit unsigned integer type."], u101, 101, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 673 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 101-bit unsigned integer type."], u101, 101, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 674 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 102-bit unsigned integer type."], u102, 102, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 674 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 102-bit unsigned integer type."], u102, 102, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 674 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 102-bit unsigned integer type."], u102, 102, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 674 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 102-bit unsigned integer type."], u102, 102, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 675 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 103-bit unsigned integer type."], u103, 103, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 675 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 103-bit unsigned integer type."], u103, 103, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 675 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 103-bit unsigned integer type."], u103, 103, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 675 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 103-bit unsigned integer type."], u103, 103, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 676 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 104-bit unsigned integer type."], u104, 104, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 676 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 104-bit unsigned integer type."], u104, 104, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 676 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 104-bit unsigned integer type."], u104, 104, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 676 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 104-bit unsigned integer type."], u104, 104, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 678 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 105-bit unsigned integer type."], u105, 105, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 678 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 105-bit unsigned integer type."], u105, 105, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 678 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 105-bit unsigned integer type."], u105, 105, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 678 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 105-bit unsigned integer type."], u105, 105, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 679 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 106-bit unsigned integer type."], u106, 106, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 679 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 106-bit unsigned integer type."], u106, 106, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 679 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 106-bit unsigned integer type."], u106, 106, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 679 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 106-bit unsigned integer type."], u106, 106, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 680 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 107-bit unsigned integer type."], u107, 107, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 680 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 107-bit unsigned integer type."], u107, 107, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 680 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 107-bit unsigned integer type."], u107, 107, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 680 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 107-bit unsigned integer type."], u107, 107, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 681 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 108-bit unsigned integer type."], u108, 108, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 681 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 108-bit unsigned integer type."], u108, 108, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 681 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 108-bit unsigned integer type."], u108, 108, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 681 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 108-bit unsigned integer type."], u108, 108, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 682 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 109-bit unsigned integer type."], u109, 109, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 682 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 109-bit unsigned integer type."], u109, 109, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 682 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 109-bit unsigned integer type."], u109, 109, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 682 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 109-bit unsigned integer type."], u109, 109, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 683 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 110-bit unsigned integer type."], u110, 110, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 683 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 110-bit unsigned integer type."], u110, 110, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 683 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 110-bit unsigned integer type."], u110, 110, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 683 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 110-bit unsigned integer type."], u110, 110, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 684 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 111-bit unsigned integer type."], u111, 111, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 684 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 111-bit unsigned integer type."], u111, 111, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 684 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 111-bit unsigned integer type."], u111, 111, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 684 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 111-bit unsigned integer type."], u111, 111, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 685 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 112-bit unsigned integer type."], u112, 112, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 685 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 112-bit unsigned integer type."], u112, 112, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 685 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 112-bit unsigned integer type."], u112, 112, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 685 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 112-bit unsigned integer type."], u112, 112, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 687 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 113-bit unsigned integer type."], u113, 113, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 687 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 113-bit unsigned integer type."], u113, 113, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 687 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 113-bit unsigned integer type."], u113, 113, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 687 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 113-bit unsigned integer type."], u113, 113, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 688 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 114-bit unsigned integer type."], u114, 114, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 688 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 114-bit unsigned integer type."], u114, 114, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 688 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 114-bit unsigned integer type."], u114, 114, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 688 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 114-bit unsigned integer type."], u114, 114, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 689 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 115-bit unsigned integer type."], u115, 115, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 689 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 115-bit unsigned integer type."], u115, 115, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 689 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 115-bit unsigned integer type."], u115, 115, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 689 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 115-bit unsigned integer type."], u115, 115, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 690 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 116-bit unsigned integer type."], u116, 116, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 690 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 116-bit unsigned integer type."], u116, 116, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 690 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 116-bit unsigned integer type."], u116, 116, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 690 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 116-bit unsigned integer type."], u116, 116, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 691 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 117-bit unsigned integer type."], u117, 117, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 691 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 117-bit unsigned integer type."], u117, 117, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 691 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 117-bit unsigned integer type."], u117, 117, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 691 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 117-bit unsigned integer type."], u117, 117, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 692 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 118-bit unsigned integer type."], u118, 118, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 692 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 118-bit unsigned integer type."], u118, 118, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 692 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 118-bit unsigned integer type."], u118, 118, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 692 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 118-bit unsigned integer type."], u118, 118, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 693 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 119-bit unsigned integer type."], u119, 119, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 693 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 119-bit unsigned integer type."], u119, 119, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 693 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 119-bit unsigned integer type."], u119, 119, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 693 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 119-bit unsigned integer type."], u119, 119, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 694 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 120-bit unsigned integer type."], u120, 120, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 694 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 120-bit unsigned integer type."], u120, 120, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 694 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 120-bit unsigned integer type."], u120, 120, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 694 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 120-bit unsigned integer type."], u120, 120, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 696 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 121-bit unsigned integer type."], u121, 121, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 696 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 121-bit unsigned integer type."], u121, 121, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 696 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 121-bit unsigned integer type."], u121, 121, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 696 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 121-bit unsigned integer type."], u121, 121, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 697 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 122-bit unsigned integer type."], u122, 122, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 697 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 122-bit unsigned integer type."], u122, 122, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 697 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 122-bit unsigned integer type."], u122, 122, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 697 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 122-bit unsigned integer type."], u122, 122, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 698 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 123-bit unsigned integer type."], u123, 123, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 698 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 123-bit unsigned integer type."], u123, 123, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 698 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 123-bit unsigned integer type."], u123, 123, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 698 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 123-bit unsigned integer type."], u123, 123, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 699 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 124-bit unsigned integer type."], u124, 124, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 699 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 124-bit unsigned integer type."], u124, 124, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 699 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 124-bit unsigned integer type."], u124, 124, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 699 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 124-bit unsigned integer type."], u124, 124, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 700 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 125-bit unsigned integer type."], u125, 125, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 700 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 125-bit unsigned integer type."], u125, 125, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 700 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 125-bit unsigned integer type."], u125, 125, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 700 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 125-bit unsigned integer type."], u125, 125, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 701 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 126-bit unsigned integer type."], u126, 126, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 701 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 126-bit unsigned integer type."], u126, 126, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 701 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 126-bit unsigned integer type."], u126, 126, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 701 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 126-bit unsigned integer type."], u126, 126, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 702 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 127-bit unsigned integer type."], u127, 127, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 702 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 127-bit unsigned integer type."], u127, 127, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 702 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 127-bit unsigned integer type."], u127, 127, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 702 | define_unsigned!(#[doc="The 127-bit unsigned integer type."], u127, 127, u128); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_unsigned` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 705 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 1-bit signed integer type."], i1, 1, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 705 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 1-bit signed integer type."], i1, 1, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 705 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 1-bit signed integer type."], i1, 1, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 705 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 1-bit signed integer type."], i1, 1, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 706 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 2-bit signed integer type."], i2, 2, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 706 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 2-bit signed integer type."], i2, 2, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 706 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 2-bit signed integer type."], i2, 2, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 706 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 2-bit signed integer type."], i2, 2, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 707 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 3-bit signed integer type."], i3, 3, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 707 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 3-bit signed integer type."], i3, 3, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 707 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 3-bit signed integer type."], i3, 3, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 707 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 3-bit signed integer type."], i3, 3, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 708 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 4-bit signed integer type."], i4, 4, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 708 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 4-bit signed integer type."], i4, 4, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 708 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 4-bit signed integer type."], i4, 4, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 708 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 4-bit signed integer type."], i4, 4, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 709 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 5-bit signed integer type."], i5, 5, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 709 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 5-bit signed integer type."], i5, 5, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 709 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 5-bit signed integer type."], i5, 5, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 709 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 5-bit signed integer type."], i5, 5, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 710 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 6-bit signed integer type."], i6, 6, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 710 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 6-bit signed integer type."], i6, 6, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 710 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 6-bit signed integer type."], i6, 6, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 710 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 6-bit signed integer type."], i6, 6, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 711 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 7-bit signed integer type."], i7, 7, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 711 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 7-bit signed integer type."], i7, 7, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 711 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 7-bit signed integer type."], i7, 7, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 711 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 7-bit signed integer type."], i7, 7, i8); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 713 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 9-bit signed integer type."], i9, 9, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 713 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 9-bit signed integer type."], i9, 9, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 713 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 9-bit signed integer type."], i9, 9, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 713 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 9-bit signed integer type."], i9, 9, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 714 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 10-bit signed integer type."], i10, 10, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 714 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 10-bit signed integer type."], i10, 10, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 714 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 10-bit signed integer type."], i10, 10, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 714 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 10-bit signed integer type."], i10, 10, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 715 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 11-bit signed integer type."], i11, 11, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 715 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 11-bit signed integer type."], i11, 11, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 715 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 11-bit signed integer type."], i11, 11, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 715 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 11-bit signed integer type."], i11, 11, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 716 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 12-bit signed integer type."], i12, 12, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 716 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 12-bit signed integer type."], i12, 12, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 716 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 12-bit signed integer type."], i12, 12, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 716 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 12-bit signed integer type."], i12, 12, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 717 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 13-bit signed integer type."], i13, 13, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 717 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 13-bit signed integer type."], i13, 13, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 717 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 13-bit signed integer type."], i13, 13, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 717 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 13-bit signed integer type."], i13, 13, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 718 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 14-bit signed integer type."], i14, 14, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 718 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 14-bit signed integer type."], i14, 14, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 718 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 14-bit signed integer type."], i14, 14, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 718 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 14-bit signed integer type."], i14, 14, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 719 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 15-bit signed integer type."], i15, 15, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 719 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 15-bit signed integer type."], i15, 15, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 719 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 15-bit signed integer type."], i15, 15, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 719 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 15-bit signed integer type."], i15, 15, i16); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 721 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 17-bit signed integer type."], i17, 17, i32); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 721 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 17-bit signed integer type."], i17, 17, i32); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 548 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 721 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 17-bit signed integer type."], i17, 17, i32); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:555:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 555 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 721 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 17-bit signed integer type."], i17, 17, i32); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:527:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 527 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 722 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 18-bit signed integer type."], i18, 18, i32); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:537:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 537 | #[cfg(num)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^ help: found config with similar value: `feature = "num"` [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 722 | define_signed!(#[doc="The 18-bit signed integer type."], i18, 18, i32); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(num)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(num)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `implement_common` which comes from the expansion of the macro `define_signed` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `num` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:548:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [WARN] too many lines in the log, truncating it