[INFO] fetching crate semver-eq 1.0.22... [INFO] testing semver-eq-1.0.22 against try#b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b for pr-145330-1 [INFO] extracting crate semver-eq 1.0.22 into /workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source [INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 [INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 [INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 written to /workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source/Cargo.toml [INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 on toolchain b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Updating crates.io index [INFO] [stderr] Locking 7 packages to latest compatible versions [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 23f10f028008c192297593b9726b43ee46a85044ddd81d949c9a2f3359c3a6dd [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "23f10f028008c192297593b9726b43ee46a85044ddd81d949c9a2f3359c3a6dd", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "23f10f028008c192297593b9726b43ee46a85044ddd81d949c9a2f3359c3a6dd", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "23f10f028008c192297593b9726b43ee46a85044ddd81d949c9a2f3359c3a6dd", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 23f10f028008c192297593b9726b43ee46a85044ddd81d949c9a2f3359c3a6dd [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 418be39a9d53fd9e78122db08d69c305669aee431e81f0a4d6e2d265f7be8a9c [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "418be39a9d53fd9e78122db08d69c305669aee431e81f0a4d6e2d265f7be8a9c", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Compiling semver-eq v1.0.22 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:64:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 64 | #![cfg_attr(doc_cfg, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:65:43 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 65 | #![cfg_attr(all(not(feature = "std"), not(no_alloc_crate)), no_std)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:66:17 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 66 | #![cfg_attr(not(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint), deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:67:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 67 | #![cfg_attr(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint, allow(unused_unsafe))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:68:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 68 | #![cfg_attr(no_str_strip_prefix, allow(unstable_name_collisions))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:89:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 89 | #[cfg(not(no_alloc_crate))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:188:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 188 | #[cfg_attr(no_const_vec_new, derive(Default))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:252:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 252 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_non_exhaustive), non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:529:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 529 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:263:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 263 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] // rustc <1.40 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:1:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] // rustc <1.45 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:6:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:19:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 19 | #[cfg(no_alloc_crate)] // rustc <1.36 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/display.rs:59:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/error.rs:29:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg_attr(doc_cfg, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/eval.rs:39:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_exhaustive_int_match` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:166:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)] // rustc <1.33 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:327:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:416:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 416 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] // rustc <1.53 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:92:27 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:94:23 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:497:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 497 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.81s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "418be39a9d53fd9e78122db08d69c305669aee431e81f0a4d6e2d265f7be8a9c", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "418be39a9d53fd9e78122db08d69c305669aee431e81f0a4d6e2d265f7be8a9c", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 418be39a9d53fd9e78122db08d69c305669aee431e81f0a4d6e2d265f7be8a9c [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b" "test" "--frozen" "--no-run" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] a3cf4abf2b8ae9af4e6217f4e3418706bcbba5c4312ca3f7ebbfa40e91cf6ebe [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "a3cf4abf2b8ae9af4e6217f4e3418706bcbba5c4312ca3f7ebbfa40e91cf6ebe", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:64:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 64 | #![cfg_attr(doc_cfg, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:65:43 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 65 | #![cfg_attr(all(not(feature = "std"), not(no_alloc_crate)), no_std)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:66:17 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 66 | #![cfg_attr(not(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint), deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:67:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 67 | #![cfg_attr(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint, allow(unused_unsafe))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:68:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 68 | #![cfg_attr(no_str_strip_prefix, allow(unstable_name_collisions))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:89:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 89 | #[cfg(not(no_alloc_crate))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:188:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 188 | #[cfg_attr(no_const_vec_new, derive(Default))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:252:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 252 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_non_exhaustive), non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:529:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 529 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:263:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 263 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] // rustc <1.40 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:1:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] // rustc <1.45 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:6:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:19:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 19 | #[cfg(no_alloc_crate)] // rustc <1.36 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/display.rs:59:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/error.rs:29:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg_attr(doc_cfg, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/eval.rs:39:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_exhaustive_int_match` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:166:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)] // rustc <1.33 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:327:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:416:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 416 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] // rustc <1.53 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:92:27 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:94:23 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:497:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 497 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Compiling semver-eq v1.0.22 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:11:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 11 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:16:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 16 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:21:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:26:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:31:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:36:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:41:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:46:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:51:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 51 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/node/mod.rs:1:8 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #![cfg(test_node_semver)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:15:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 15 | #[cfg(test_node_semver)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:17:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 17 | #[cfg(not(test_node_semver))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:20:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:28:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 28 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:45:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 45 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:11:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 11 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:16:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 16 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:21:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:26:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:31:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:36:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:41:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:46:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:51:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 51 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:319:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 319 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:321:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 321 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:64:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 64 | #![cfg_attr(doc_cfg, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:65:43 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 65 | #![cfg_attr(all(not(feature = "std"), not(no_alloc_crate)), no_std)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:66:17 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 66 | #![cfg_attr(not(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint), deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:67:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 67 | #![cfg_attr(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint, allow(unused_unsafe))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:68:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 68 | #![cfg_attr(no_str_strip_prefix, allow(unstable_name_collisions))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:89:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 89 | #[cfg(not(no_alloc_crate))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:188:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 188 | #[cfg_attr(no_const_vec_new, derive(Default))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:252:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 252 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_non_exhaustive), non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:529:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 529 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:263:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 263 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] // rustc <1.40 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:1:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] // rustc <1.45 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:6:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:19:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 19 | #[cfg(no_alloc_crate)] // rustc <1.36 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/display.rs:59:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/error.rs:29:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg_attr(doc_cfg, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/eval.rs:39:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_exhaustive_int_match` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:166:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)] // rustc <1.33 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:327:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:416:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 416 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] // rustc <1.53 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:92:27 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:94:23 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:497:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 497 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:11:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 11 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:16:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 16 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:21:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:26:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:31:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:36:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:41:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:46:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:51:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 51 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unused variable: `r` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:133:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 133 | let ref r = req("0.1.0, 0.1.4, 0.1.6"); [INFO] [stdout] | ^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_r` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1.07s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "a3cf4abf2b8ae9af4e6217f4e3418706bcbba5c4312ca3f7ebbfa40e91cf6ebe", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "a3cf4abf2b8ae9af4e6217f4e3418706bcbba5c4312ca3f7ebbfa40e91cf6ebe", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] a3cf4abf2b8ae9af4e6217f4e3418706bcbba5c4312ca3f7ebbfa40e91cf6ebe [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+b6ae10aa7319b7ebb6c7b3331dd71a9d6c9c5b4b" "test" "--frozen", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 44442a7caa23628dc09ab48d9cbfbfe0bcf8a246bc0870d3392be2fc2a97b363 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "44442a7caa23628dc09ab48d9cbfbfe0bcf8a246bc0870d3392be2fc2a97b363", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:64:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 64 | #![cfg_attr(doc_cfg, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:65:43 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 65 | #![cfg_attr(all(not(feature = "std"), not(no_alloc_crate)), no_std)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:66:17 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 66 | #![cfg_attr(not(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint), deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:67:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 67 | #![cfg_attr(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint, allow(unused_unsafe))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:68:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 68 | #![cfg_attr(no_str_strip_prefix, allow(unstable_name_collisions))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:89:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 89 | #[cfg(not(no_alloc_crate))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:188:12 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 188 | #[cfg_attr(no_const_vec_new, derive(Default))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:252:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 252 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_non_exhaustive), non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:529:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 529 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:263:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 263 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] // rustc <1.40 [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/backport.rs:1:7 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 1 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] // rustc <1.45 [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/backport.rs:6:7 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/backport.rs:19:7 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 19 | #[cfg(no_alloc_crate)] // rustc <1.36 [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/display.rs:59:19 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 59 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/error.rs:29:12 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 29 | #[cfg_attr(doc_cfg, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/eval.rs:39:15 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 39 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_exhaustive_int_match` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/identifier.rs:166:19 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 166 | #[cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)] // rustc <1.33 [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/identifier.rs:327:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 327 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/identifier.rs:416:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 416 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] // rustc <1.53 [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/parse.rs:92:27 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 92 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/parse.rs:94:23 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:497:15 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 497 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: `semver-eq` (lib) generated 22 warnings [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:11:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 11 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:16:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 16 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:21:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 21 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:26:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 26 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:31:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 31 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:36:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 36 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:41:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 41 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:46:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 46 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:51:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 51 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: `semver-eq` (test "test_version") generated 10 warnings [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/node/mod.rs:1:8 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 1 | #![cfg(test_node_semver)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:15:7 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 15 | #[cfg(test_node_semver)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:17:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 17 | #[cfg(not(test_node_semver))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:20:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 20 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:28:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 28 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:45:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 45 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:319:15 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 319 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:321:11 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 321 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unused variable: `r` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:133:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 133 | let ref r = req("0.1.0, 0.1.4, 0.1.6"); [INFO] [stderr] | ^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_r` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: `semver-eq` (test "test_identifier") generated 10 warnings (10 duplicates) [INFO] [stderr] warning: `semver-eq` (test "test_version_req") generated 19 warnings (9 duplicates) [INFO] [stderr] warning: `semver-eq` (lib test) generated 22 warnings (22 duplicates) [INFO] [stderr] Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.06s [INFO] [stderr] Running unittests src/lib.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/semver_eq-f69306a64be102c1) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 0 tests [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Running tests/test_autotrait.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/test_autotrait-9abff941dccc1b8b) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 1 test [INFO] [stdout] test test ... ok [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Running tests/test_identifier.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/test_identifier-84f12840956e0f6e) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 3 tests [INFO] [stdout] test test_eq ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_prerelease ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_new ... ok [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.11s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 10 tests [INFO] [stderr] Running tests/test_version.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/test_version-d2b4dc2c0d2eebe0) [INFO] [stdout] test test_display ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_gt ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_eq ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_le ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_ne ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_lt ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_parse ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_ge ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_spec_order ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_align ... ok [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 10 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Running tests/test_version_req.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/test_version_req-9ae86f05e74b69bd) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 20 tests [INFO] [stdout] test test_basic ... ok [INFO] [stderr] Doc-tests semver_eq [INFO] [stdout] test test_caret ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_any ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_cargo3202 ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_comparator_parse ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_default ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_logical_or ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_digit_after_wildcard ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_eq_hash ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_greater_than ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_multiple ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_leading_digit_in_pre_and_build ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_less_than ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_whitespace_delimited_comparator_sets ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_pre ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_wildcard ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_tilde ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_wildcard_and_another ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_parse ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test test_exact ... ok [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 20 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 4 tests [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - Version::new (line 385) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - (line 19) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/parse.rs - parse::Error (line 11) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - Version::cmp_precedence (line 442) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 4 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.61s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "44442a7caa23628dc09ab48d9cbfbfe0bcf8a246bc0870d3392be2fc2a97b363", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "44442a7caa23628dc09ab48d9cbfbfe0bcf8a246bc0870d3392be2fc2a97b363", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 44442a7caa23628dc09ab48d9cbfbfe0bcf8a246bc0870d3392be2fc2a97b363