[INFO] fetching crate semver-eq 1.0.22... [INFO] building semver-eq-1.0.22 against master#11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392+rustflags=-Dtail-expr-drop-order for pr-134523 [INFO] extracting crate semver-eq 1.0.22 into /workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/source [INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 on toolchain 11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392 [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 [INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 [INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate semver-eq 1.0.22 written to /workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/source/Cargo.toml [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Updating crates.io index [INFO] [stderr] Blocking waiting for file lock on package cache [INFO] [stderr] Locking 6 packages to latest compatible versions [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Blocking waiting for file lock on package cache [INFO] [stderr] Blocking waiting for file lock on package cache [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:f3a9d4ad9d972b27faf3965f35b62e55ba32bbce8f20bc8fe909558a86702fde" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] b9d83dc2236ddda8ad0abccbe415b8caa0eaf4302ec14ba8c8de99ba6191390e [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "b9d83dc2236ddda8ad0abccbe415b8caa0eaf4302ec14ba8c8de99ba6191390e", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "b9d83dc2236ddda8ad0abccbe415b8caa0eaf4302ec14ba8c8de99ba6191390e", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "b9d83dc2236ddda8ad0abccbe415b8caa0eaf4302ec14ba8c8de99ba6191390e", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] b9d83dc2236ddda8ad0abccbe415b8caa0eaf4302ec14ba8c8de99ba6191390e [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid -Dtail-expr-drop-order" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:f3a9d4ad9d972b27faf3965f35b62e55ba32bbce8f20bc8fe909558a86702fde" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 8fdf784a4c6f3fe5ed2bf61478e9c7f867011c348f12ec529d919f170b5d3003 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "8fdf784a4c6f3fe5ed2bf61478e9c7f867011c348f12ec529d919f170b5d3003", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Compiling semver-eq v1.0.22 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:64:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 64 | #![cfg_attr(doc_cfg, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:65:43 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 65 | #![cfg_attr(all(not(feature = "std"), not(no_alloc_crate)), no_std)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:66:17 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 66 | #![cfg_attr(not(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint), deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:67:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 67 | #![cfg_attr(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint, allow(unused_unsafe))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:68:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 68 | #![cfg_attr(no_str_strip_prefix, allow(unstable_name_collisions))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:89:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 89 | #[cfg(not(no_alloc_crate))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:188:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 188 | #[cfg_attr(no_const_vec_new, derive(Default))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:252:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 252 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_non_exhaustive), non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:529:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 529 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:263:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 263 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] // rustc <1.40 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:1:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] // rustc <1.45 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:6:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:19:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 19 | #[cfg(no_alloc_crate)] // rustc <1.36 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/display.rs:59:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/error.rs:29:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg_attr(doc_cfg, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/eval.rs:39:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_exhaustive_int_match` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:166:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)] // rustc <1.33 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:327:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:416:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 416 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] // rustc <1.53 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:92:27 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:94:23 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:497:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 497 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.67s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "8fdf784a4c6f3fe5ed2bf61478e9c7f867011c348f12ec529d919f170b5d3003", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "8fdf784a4c6f3fe5ed2bf61478e9c7f867011c348f12ec529d919f170b5d3003", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 8fdf784a4c6f3fe5ed2bf61478e9c7f867011c348f12ec529d919f170b5d3003 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid -Dtail-expr-drop-order" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:f3a9d4ad9d972b27faf3965f35b62e55ba32bbce8f20bc8fe909558a86702fde" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+11663cd3bfefef7d34e8f0892c250bf698049392" "test" "--frozen" "--no-run" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] eaf6cab4a5646b0110af0a07d23776bab2c59a271915cce82e6048394b691804 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "eaf6cab4a5646b0110af0a07d23776bab2c59a271915cce82e6048394b691804", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:64:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 64 | #![cfg_attr(doc_cfg, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:65:43 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 65 | #![cfg_attr(all(not(feature = "std"), not(no_alloc_crate)), no_std)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:66:17 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 66 | #![cfg_attr(not(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint), deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:67:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 67 | #![cfg_attr(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint, allow(unused_unsafe))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:68:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 68 | #![cfg_attr(no_str_strip_prefix, allow(unstable_name_collisions))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:89:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 89 | #[cfg(not(no_alloc_crate))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:188:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 188 | #[cfg_attr(no_const_vec_new, derive(Default))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:252:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 252 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_non_exhaustive), non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:529:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 529 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:263:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 263 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] // rustc <1.40 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:1:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] // rustc <1.45 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:6:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:19:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 19 | #[cfg(no_alloc_crate)] // rustc <1.36 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/display.rs:59:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Compiling semver-eq v1.0.22 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/error.rs:29:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg_attr(doc_cfg, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/eval.rs:39:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_exhaustive_int_match` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:166:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)] // rustc <1.33 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:327:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:416:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 416 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] // rustc <1.53 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:92:27 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:94:23 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:497:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 497 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:11:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 11 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:16:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 16 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:21:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:26:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:31:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:36:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:41:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:46:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:51:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 51 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/node/mod.rs:1:8 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #![cfg(test_node_semver)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:15:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 15 | #[cfg(test_node_semver)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `test_node_semver` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:17:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 17 | #[cfg(not(test_node_semver))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(test_node_semver)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(test_node_semver)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:20:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:28:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 28 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:45:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 45 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:11:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 11 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:6:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:11:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 11 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:16:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 16 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:21:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:26:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:31:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:36:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:41:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:46:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:51:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 51 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:16:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 16 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:21:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:26:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:31:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:36:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:41:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:46:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_track_caller` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/util/mod.rs:51:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 51 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_track_caller), track_caller)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_track_caller)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_track_caller)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:319:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 319 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:321:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 321 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unused variable: `r` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/test_version_req.rs:133:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 133 | let ref r = req("0.1.0, 0.1.4, 0.1.6"); [INFO] [stdout] | ^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_r` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:64:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 64 | #![cfg_attr(doc_cfg, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:65:43 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 65 | #![cfg_attr(all(not(feature = "std"), not(no_alloc_crate)), no_std)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:66:17 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 66 | #![cfg_attr(not(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint), deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:67:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 67 | #![cfg_attr(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint, allow(unused_unsafe))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_lint)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:68:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 68 | #![cfg_attr(no_str_strip_prefix, allow(unstable_name_collisions))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:89:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 89 | #[cfg(not(no_alloc_crate))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:188:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 188 | #[cfg_attr(no_const_vec_new, derive(Default))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:252:16 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 252 | #[cfg_attr(not(no_non_exhaustive), non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:529:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 529 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:263:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 263 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] // rustc <1.40 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:1:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 1 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] // rustc <1.45 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_str_strip_prefix` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:6:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_str_strip_prefix)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_alloc_crate` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/backport.rs:19:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 19 | #[cfg(no_alloc_crate)] // rustc <1.36 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_alloc_crate)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_alloc_crate)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/display.rs:59:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `doc_cfg` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/error.rs:29:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg_attr(doc_cfg, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(doc_cfg)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(doc_cfg)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_non_exhaustive` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/eval.rs:39:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(no_non_exhaustive)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_non_exhaustive)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_non_exhaustive)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_exhaustive_int_match` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:166:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)] // rustc <1.33 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_exhaustive_int_match)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:327:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_nonzero_bitscan` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/identifier.rs:416:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 416 | #[cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)] // rustc <1.53 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_nonzero_bitscan)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:92:27 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/parse.rs:94:23 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(no_const_vec_new)] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `no_const_vec_new` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:497:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 497 | #[cfg(not(no_const_vec_new))] // rustc <1.39 [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(no_const_vec_new)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(no_const_vec_new)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.53s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "eaf6cab4a5646b0110af0a07d23776bab2c59a271915cce82e6048394b691804", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "eaf6cab4a5646b0110af0a07d23776bab2c59a271915cce82e6048394b691804", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] eaf6cab4a5646b0110af0a07d23776bab2c59a271915cce82e6048394b691804