[INFO] fetching crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1...
[INFO] checking rgb-lightning-0.0.1 against try#7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf+rustflags=-Dtail_expr_drop_order for pr-129864
[INFO] extracting crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1 into /workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source
[INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1 on toolchain 7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1
[INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1
[INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate rgb-lightning 0.0.1 written to /workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source/Cargo.toml
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]     Updating crates.io index
[INFO] [stderr]      Locking 36 packages to latest compatible versions
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding ahash v0.3.8 (available: v0.8.11)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding bech32 v0.9.1 (available: v0.11.0)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding bitcoin v0.29.2 (available: v0.32.2)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding bitcoin_hashes v0.11.0 (available: v0.14.0)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding bitcoinconsensus v0.20.2-0.5.0 (available: v0.106.0+26.0)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding core2 v0.3.3 (available: v0.4.0)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding hashbrown v0.8.2 (available: v0.14.5)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding secp256k1 v0.24.3 (available: v0.29.1)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding secp256k1-sys v0.6.1 (available: v0.10.1)
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:ceb6ea022f8a89cebbe621bb4987e73a935bd40dfbb726f832cfff4742a5b95a" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 5771a5a86c06628fbfa67d0852b511c4fa7b474fc3afeb64fbe5bb066f0a5135
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "5771a5a86c06628fbfa67d0852b511c4fa7b474fc3afeb64fbe5bb066f0a5135", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "5771a5a86c06628fbfa67d0852b511c4fa7b474fc3afeb64fbe5bb066f0a5135", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "5771a5a86c06628fbfa67d0852b511c4fa7b474fc3afeb64fbe5bb066f0a5135", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 5771a5a86c06628fbfa67d0852b511c4fa7b474fc3afeb64fbe5bb066f0a5135
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-5-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid -Dtail_expr_drop_order" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:ceb6ea022f8a89cebbe621bb4987e73a935bd40dfbb726f832cfff4742a5b95a" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf" "check" "--frozen" "--all" "--all-targets" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] f5c84ae1cc28b02508ddb94cee48d4c7e972bb67140b27901f93f6a09e3a862d
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "f5c84ae1cc28b02508ddb94cee48d4c7e972bb67140b27901f93f6a09e3a862d", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling shlex v1.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking bitcoin_hashes v0.11.0
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking bech32 v0.9.1
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking hex v0.4.3
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking regex-automata v0.4.7
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling cc v1.1.21
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling secp256k1-sys v0.6.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitcoinconsensus v0.20.2-0.5.0
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking regex v1.10.6
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking secp256k1 v0.24.3
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking bitcoin v0.29.2
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking rgb-lightning v0.0.1 (/opt/rustwide/workdir)
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:40:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 40 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), deny(missing_docs))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows`
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:41:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), forbid(unsafe_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:63:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 | #[cfg(all(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:73:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 73 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))] extern crate regex;
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:32:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 32 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:34:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:36:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:54:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 54 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:59:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:18:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:31:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:37:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 37 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:39:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:224:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 224 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:244:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 244 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:337:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 337 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:940:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 940 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/events.rs:1119:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1119 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/wakers.rs:199:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 199 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20.rs:14:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:275:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 275 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:300:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 300 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:41:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:96:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 96 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:17:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:155:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 155 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:258:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 258 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:327:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:22:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:98:12
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 98 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:101:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 101 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:111:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 111 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:124:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 124 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:126:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 126 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:131:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 131 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:398:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:406:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 406 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:481:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 481 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:491:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 491 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:659:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |                 #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:661:25
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 661 |                 #[cfg(not(any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:745:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 745 |     #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:761:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 761 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:46:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:55:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 55 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:72:22
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 72 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:269:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 269 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:495:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 495 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:857:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 857 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:868:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 868 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:2402:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2402 |         #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3397:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3397 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3400:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3400 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:344:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 344 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:812:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 812 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:27:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:30:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 30 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:35:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:47:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 47 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:177:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 177 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:189:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 189 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:211:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 211 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:250:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 250 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:410:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 410 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:446:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 446 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:1048:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1048 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:431:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 431 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:507:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 507 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:542:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 542 |             #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:544:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 544 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:554:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 554 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:677:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 677 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:814:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 814 | ...                   #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:848:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 848 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:924:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 924 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:29:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:659:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:756:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 756 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:36:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:38:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:41:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:43:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 43 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1011:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1011 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: `#[warn(renamed_and_removed_lints)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1017:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1017 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:3646:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3646 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5455:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5455 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5809:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5809 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1651:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 |             if cfg!(fuzzing) { // fuzzing chacha20 doesn't use the key at all so we always get the same alias
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1727:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1727 |                 if cfg!(fuzzing) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1053:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1053 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1055:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1055 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1984:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1984 |     #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |            ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:787:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 787 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channel.rs:50:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 50 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, debug_assertions))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:458:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 458 | #[cfg(any(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:460:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 460 | #[cfg(not(any(fuzzing, test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:747:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 747 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:695:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 695 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:697:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 697 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:709:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 709 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1064:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1064 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1066:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1066 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1076:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1076 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1412:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1412 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1414:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1414 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1424:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1424 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1910:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1910 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1855:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1855 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1906:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1885:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1885 | ...                   #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2008:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2008 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2026:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2026 | ...                   #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2666:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2666 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2750:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2750 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3040:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3040 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3347:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3347 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4948:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4948 |                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4996:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4996 | ...                   #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5008:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5008 | ...                   #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5763:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5763 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6265:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6265 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6267:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6267 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6553:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6553 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6555:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6555 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6763:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6763 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6765:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6765 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6776:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6776 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:289:36
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 289 | #[cfg(any(feature = "_test_utils", fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1888:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1888 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `channels`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1906:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `nodes`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:144:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 144 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:755:56
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 755 |     #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:776:57
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 776 |         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |   ...                       #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |   ...                       #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |   ...                       #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |   ...                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | | ...                       NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |   ...                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | | ...                       NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |   ...                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | | ...                       NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:139:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 139 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:141:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:166:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:186:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 186 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:191:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 191 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:194:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 194 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:212:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 212 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:219:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 219 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:228:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 228 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:235:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 235 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:238:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 238 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:246:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 246 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:254:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 254 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:393:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 393 |                 #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unused import: `RwLockWriteGuard`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:188:82
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 188 |     pub use ::std::sync::{Arc, Mutex, Condvar, MutexGuard, RwLock, RwLockReadGuard, RwLockWriteGuard};
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(unused_imports)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:40:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 40 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), deny(missing_docs))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows`
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:41:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), forbid(unsafe_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:63:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 | #[cfg(all(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:73:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 73 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))] extern crate regex;
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:32:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 32 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:34:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:36:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:54:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 54 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:59:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 59 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:18:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 18 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:31:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:37:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 37 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/events.rs:39:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:224:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 224 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:244:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 244 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:337:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 337 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/events.rs:940:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 940 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/events.rs:1119:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1119 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/wakers.rs:199:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 199 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20.rs:14:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 14 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:275:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 275 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:278:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 278 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20.rs:300:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 300 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:41:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/zbase32.rs:96:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 96 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:17:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:155:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 155 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:258:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 258 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:327:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 327 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:22:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:98:12
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 98 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:101:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 101 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:111:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 111 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:124:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 124 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:126:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 126 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:131:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 131 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:26:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 26 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:195:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 195 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |               #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:171:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 171 |               let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ___________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 172 | |                 &sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 173 | |                     0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, sighash_type,
[INFO] [stdout] 174 | |                 ).unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 175 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |               #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs:171:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 171 |               let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ___________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 172 | |                 &sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 173 | |                     0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, sighash_type,
[INFO] [stdout] 174 | |                 ).unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 175 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:398:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:406:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 406 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:481:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 481 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:491:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 491 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:659:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |                 #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:661:25
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 661 |                 #[cfg(not(any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:745:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 745 |     #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:761:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 761 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:838:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 838 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:841:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 841 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:846:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 846 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:849:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 849 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:46:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:55:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 55 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:72:22
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 72 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:269:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 269 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:495:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 495 | #[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                      ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:857:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 857 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:868:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 868 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:2402:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2402 |         #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3397:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3397 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3400:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3400 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3497 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3498 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3502 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 3503 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3413:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3413 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3415:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3415 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3419:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3419 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3507 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, (b.as_ref().clone()).map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 3508 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4328:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4328 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4328:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4328 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4360:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4360 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4360:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4360 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4390:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4390 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4390:6
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4390 |                     sign_input!(sighash_parts, idx, 0, inp, sum_actual_sigs, opt_anchors);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     --------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` which comes from the expansion of the macro `sign_input` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:344:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 344 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:666:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 666 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:702:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, descriptor.output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:812:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 812 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:752:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 752 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:794:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 794 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:808:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:837:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 837 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(&sighash_parts.segwit_signature_hash(input, &witness_script, amount, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwra...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:854:22
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |         Ok(sign(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key))
[INFO] [stdout]     |                            ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:859:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 859 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1205:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1205 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&spend_tx).segwit_signature_hash(input_idx, &witness_script, output.value, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1298:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1298 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/chain/keysinterface.rs:1386:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&Sha256::hash(&preimage)), &secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:27:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:30:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 30 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:35:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:47:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 47 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:177:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 177 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:189:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 189 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:211:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 211 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:250:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 250 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:410:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 410 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:446:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 446 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:1048:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1048 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:431:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 431 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:507:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 507 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:542:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 542 |             #[cfg(not(anchors))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:544:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 544 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:554:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 554 |             #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:677:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 677 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:814:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 814 | ...                   #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:848:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 848 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:924:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 924 |                     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:29:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 29 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/chain/package.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:659:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 659 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/package.rs:756:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 756 |     #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:36:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 36 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:38:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:41:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 41 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:43:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 43 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1011:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1011 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: `#[warn(renamed_and_removed_lints)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1017:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1017 | #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |        ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:3646:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3646 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5455:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5455 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5809:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5809 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1651:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 |             if cfg!(fuzzing) { // fuzzing chacha20 doesn't use the key at all so we always get the same alias
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1727:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1727 |                 if cfg!(fuzzing) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2429:39
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2429 |         let sig = self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &self.our_network_key);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                             ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1053:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1053 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1055:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1055 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: lint `const_err` has been removed: converted into hard error, see issue #71800 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800> for more information
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1984:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1984 |     #[deny(const_err)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |            ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/peer_handler.rs:2025:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2025 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `anchors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:787:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 787 | #[cfg(anchors)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(anchors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(anchors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1073:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1073 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1197:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1197 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1571:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1571 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channel.rs:50:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 50 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, debug_assertions))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:458:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 458 | #[cfg(any(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:460:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 460 | #[cfg(not(any(fuzzing, test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:747:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 747 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:695:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 695 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:697:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 697 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channel.rs:709:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 709 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1064:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1064 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1066:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1066 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1076:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1076 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1412:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1412 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1414:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1414 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1424:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1424 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1910:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1910 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1855:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1855 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1906:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1885:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1885 | ...                   #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2008:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2008 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2026:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2026 | ...                   #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2666:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2666 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2750:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2750 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3040:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3040 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:3072:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3072 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[.....
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3347:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3347 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4948:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4948 |                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4996:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4996 | ...                   #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5008:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5008 | ...                   #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5432:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5763:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5763 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6265:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6265 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6267:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6267 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6553:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6553 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6555:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6555 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6763:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6763 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6765:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6765 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6776:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6776 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:289:36
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 289 | #[cfg(any(feature = "_test_utils", fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 13  |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs:497:47
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 497 |     let signature = Secp256k1::new().sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &nodes[1].keys_manager.get_node_secret(Recipient::Node)...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                  ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 17  |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs:497:47
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 497 |     let signature = Secp256k1::new().sign_ecdsa(&hash_to_message!(&msg_hash[..]), &nodes[1].keys_manager.get_node_secret(Recipient::Node)...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                  ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1267:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1267 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1327:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1327 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.contents.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        -------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:1788:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1788 |                 let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1888:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1888 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `channels`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:1906:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1906 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `nodes`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2004:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2004 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2004:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2004 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2028:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2028 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2028:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2028 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2059:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2059 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_channel_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2059:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2059 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_channel_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2095:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2095 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2095:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2095 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2345:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2345 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2345:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2345 |         let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(&zero_hash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ---------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:144:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 144 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:755:56
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 755 |     #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:776:57
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 776 |         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1521 |                   let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _____________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 | |                                     0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                         #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                 #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1537 |                 add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1578 |                       if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1579 | |                                 path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1580 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1581 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta, aggregate_next_hops_path_length) {
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | /                             add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | |                                 aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |   ...                       #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |   ...                       #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |   ...                       #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1611 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1612 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1613 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1614 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1615 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | /                                 add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | |                                     NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | |                                     aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |   ...                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | | ...                       NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |   ...                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | | ...                       NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |   ...                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1651 | / ...                   add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 | | ...                       NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id),
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta,
[INFO] [stdout] 1657 | | ...                       aggregate_next_hops_path_length);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1302:61
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1302 |                           #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1295:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1295 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1397:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1397 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1403:63
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1403 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1808 | /                     add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node,
[INFO] [stdout] 1809 | |                         value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 1810 | |                         total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |______________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2147:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2147 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5096:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5096 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5115:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5115 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `require_route_graph_test`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5642:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5642 |         #[cfg(require_route_graph_test)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(require_route_graph_test)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(require_route_graph_test)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `require_route_graph_test`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:5644:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5644 |         #[cfg(not(require_route_graph_test))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(require_route_graph_test)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(require_route_graph_test)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:139:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 139 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:141:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:166:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 166 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:186:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 186 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:191:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 191 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:194:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 194 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:212:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 212 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:219:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 219 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:228:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 228 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:235:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 235 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:238:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 238 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:246:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 246 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:254:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 254 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1708:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1708 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1708:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1708 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 13   |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1741:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1741 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 17   |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/scoring.rs:1741:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1741 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:49:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 49 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:49:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 49 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:78:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 78 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:78:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 78 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&unsigned_announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:13:14
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:94:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 94 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   -------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:17:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 17 |             #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]   ::: src/routing/test_utils.rs:94:16
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 94 |     let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   -------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:393:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 393 |                 #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::Vec<(bitcoin::Txid, std::vec::Vec<(u32, TxOut)>)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:280:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 263 |     fn process_chain_data<FN>(&self, header: &BlockHeader, best_height: Option<u32>, txdata: &TransactionData, process: FN)
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                                                ------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 267 |         let monitor_states = self.monitors.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             -------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 280 |             let mut txn_outputs;
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: requested on the command line with `-D tail-expr-drop-order`
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `MutexGuard<'_, std::vec::Vec<MonitorUpdateId>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:674:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 649 |     fn update_channel(&self, funding_txo: OutPoint, update: ChannelMonitorUpdate) -> ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                     ------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 650 |         // Update the monitor that watches the channel referred to by the given outpoint.
[INFO] [stdout] 651 |         let monitors = self.monitors.read().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             -------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 674 |                 let mut pending_monitor_updates = monitor_state.pending_monitor_updates.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `MutexGuard<'_, ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:1453:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1452 |         let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(fee_estimator);
[INFO] [stdout]      |             --------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 1453 |         self.inner.lock().unwrap().transactions_confirmed(
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `MutexGuard<'_, ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:1500:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1499 |         let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(fee_estimator);
[INFO] [stdout]      |             --------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 1500 |         self.inner.lock().unwrap().best_block_updated(
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `SpendableOutputDescriptor` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3642:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3588 |         let mut spendable_output = None;
[INFO] [stdout]      |             --------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3642 |         if let Some(spendable_output) = spendable_output {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Script` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:993:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 987 |         let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             -------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 993 |                 let destination_script = match master_key.ckd_priv(&secp_ctx, ChildNumber::from_hardened_idx(1).unwrap()) {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::IntoIter<PackageTemplate>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:667:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 616 |         let mut aggregated_request = None;
[INFO] [stdout]     |             ----------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |             |
[INFO] [stdout]     |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 667 |         for mut req in preprocessed_requests {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Option<(Option<u32>, u64, OnchainClaim)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:842:56
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 724 |         let mut bump_candidates = HashMap::new();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             ------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 842 |             if let Some((new_timer, new_feerate, bump_claim)) = self.generate_claim(cur_height, &request, &*fee_estimator, &*logger) {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Result<bitcoin::secp256k1::PublicKey, APIError>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:2005:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2004 |         let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ------------------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 2005 |         match self.force_close_channel_with_peer(channel_id, counterparty_node_id, None, broadcast) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::Drain<'_, (bitcoin::secp256k1::PublicKey, MsgHandleErrInternal)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:4202:38
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1337 |             Err(MsgHandleErrInternal { err, chan_id, shutdown_finish }) => {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      ---------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1346 |                 let mut msg_events = Vec::with_capacity(2);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     -------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4077 |         let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ------------------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4124 |         let mut errs = Vec::new();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4202 |         for (counterparty_node_id, err) in errs.drain(..) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Result<UpdateFulfillCommitFetch, (ChannelError, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:4218:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         let mut short_to_chan_info = $self.short_to_chan_info.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ----------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4209 |         mut channel_state_lock: MutexGuard<ChannelHolder<<K::Target as KeysInterface>::Signer>>,
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ---------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 4210 |         prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, completion_action: ComplFunc)
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ----------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4218 |             match chan.get_mut().get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit(prev_hop.htlc_id, payment_preimage, &self.logger) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `MutexGuard<'_, std::collections::HashMap<PaymentId, PendingOutboundPayment>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:4335:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1337 |             Err(MsgHandleErrInternal { err, chan_id, shutdown_finish }) => {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      ---------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1346 |                 let mut msg_events = Vec::with_capacity(2);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     -------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4335 |                 let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `RwLockReadGuard<'_, BestBlock>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:4823:34
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         let mut short_to_chan_info = $self.short_to_chan_info.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ---------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4815 |         let mut channel_state_lock = self.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ---------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4823 |                     self.genesis_hash.clone(), &self.best_block.read().unwrap(), &self.logger), chan);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Result<(RevokeAndACK, Option<CommitmentSigned>, ChannelMonitorUpdate), (Option<ChannelMonitorUpdate>, ChannelError)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5061:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         let mut short_to_chan_info = $self.short_to_chan_info.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ----------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 5053 |         let mut channel_state_lock = self.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ---------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 5061 |                     match chan.get_mut().commitment_signed(&msg, &self.logger) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Result<(Option<(CommitmentUpdate, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>, std::vec::Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash)>), ChannelError>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5474:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         let mut short_to_chan_info = $self.short_to_chan_info.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ----------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 5474 |                 match chan.maybe_free_holding_cell_htlcs(&self.logger) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Result<(Option<ClosingSigned>, Option<bitcoin::Transaction>), ChannelError>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5536:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         let mut short_to_chan_info = $self.short_to_chan_info.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ----------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 5536 |                 match chan.maybe_propose_closing_signed(&self.fee_estimator, &self.logger) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::Drain<'_, (Option<(chain::transaction::OutPoint, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>, std::vec::Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash, bitcoin::secp256k1::PublicKey, [u8; 32])>)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:5582:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5581 |     fn handle_init_event_channel_failures(&self, mut failed_channels: Vec<ShutdownResult>) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 5582 |         for mut failure in failed_channels.drain(..) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Result<NotifyOption, MsgHandleErrInternal>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:6351:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1337 |             Err(MsgHandleErrInternal { err, chan_id, shutdown_finish }) => {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      ---------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1346 |                 let mut msg_events = Vec::with_capacity(2);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     -------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 6351 |             if let Ok(persist) = handle_error!(self, self.internal_channel_update(counterparty_node_id, msg), *counterparty_node_id) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `RwLockWriteGuard<'_, std::collections::HashMap<Descriptor, Mutex<Peer>>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1785:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1541 |         let mut _single_processor_lock = self.event_processing_lock.try_lock();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -------------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1563 |         let mut events_generated = self.message_handler.chan_handler.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1785 |             let mut peers_lock = self.peers.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Option<Descriptor>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1855:33
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1854 |         let mut peers_lock = self.peers.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 1855 |         if let Some(mut descriptor) = self.node_id_to_descriptor.lock().unwrap().remove(&node_id) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::collections::hash_map::Drain<'_, Descriptor, Mutex<Peer>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1871:33
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1868 |         let mut peers_lock = self.peers.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1871 |         for (mut descriptor, peer) in peers.drain() {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `RwLockWriteGuard<'_, std::collections::HashMap<Descriptor, Mutex<Peer>>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1959:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1907 |         let mut descriptors_needing_disconnect = Vec::new();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ---------------------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1959 |                 let mut peers_lock = self.peers.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `(Option<(CommitmentUpdate, ChannelMonitorUpdate)>, std::vec::Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash)>)` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3520:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3361 |         let mut monitor_update = ChannelMonitorUpdate {
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ------------------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3520 |         match self.free_holding_cell_htlcs(logger)? {
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: variable does not need to be mutable
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:841:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 841 |             let mut cur_hop = &mut self.hops.get_mut(i).unwrap().0;
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ----^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 help: remove this `mut`
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(unused_mut)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: aborting due to 23 previous errors; 263 warnings emitted
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr] error: could not compile `rgb-lightning` (lib) due to 24 previous errors; 263 warnings emitted
[INFO] [stderr] warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::Vec<(bitcoin::Txid, std::vec::Vec<(u32, TxOut)>)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:280:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 263 |     fn process_chain_data<FN>(&self, header: &BlockHeader, best_height: Option<u32>, txdata: &TransactionData, process: FN)
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                                                ------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 267 |         let monitor_states = self.monitors.write().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             -------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 280 |             let mut txn_outputs;
[INFO] [stdout]     |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: requested on the command line with `-D tail-expr-drop-order`
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `debug_sync::MutexGuard<'_, std::vec::Vec<MonitorUpdateId>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:674:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 649 |     fn update_channel(&self, funding_txo: OutPoint, update: ChannelMonitorUpdate) -> ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                     ------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 650 |         // Update the monitor that watches the channel referred to by the given outpoint.
[INFO] [stdout] 651 |         let monitors = self.monitors.read().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             -------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 674 |                 let mut pending_monitor_updates = monitor_state.pending_monitor_updates.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `debug_sync::MutexGuard<'_, ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:1453:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1452 |         let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(fee_estimator);
[INFO] [stdout]      |             --------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 1453 |         self.inner.lock().unwrap().transactions_confirmed(
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `debug_sync::MutexGuard<'_, ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer>>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:1500:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1499 |         let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(fee_estimator);
[INFO] [stdout]      |             --------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 1500 |         self.inner.lock().unwrap().best_block_updated(
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `SpendableOutputDescriptor` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3642:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3588 |         let mut spendable_output = None;
[INFO] [stdout]      |             --------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3642 |         if let Some(spendable_output) = spendable_output {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `bitcoin::Transaction` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4369:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4262 |         let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4300 |         let script_pubkey = Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4369 |             let mut claim_tx = Transaction { version: 0, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO, input: Vec::new(), output: Vec::new() };
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Script` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/keysinterface.rs:993:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 987 |         let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             -------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 993 |                 let destination_script = match master_key.ckd_priv(&secp_ctx, ChildNumber::from_hardened_idx(1).unwrap()) {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::IntoIter<PackageTemplate>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:667:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 616 |         let mut aggregated_request = None;
[INFO] [stdout]     |             ----------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |             |
[INFO] [stdout]     |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 667 |         for mut req in preprocessed_requests {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `Option<(Option<u32>, u64, OnchainClaim)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:842:56
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 724 |         let mut bump_candidates = HashMap::new();
[INFO] [stdout]     |             ------------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 842 |             if let Some((new_timer, new_feerate, bump_claim)) = self.generate_claim(cur_height, &request, &*fee_estimator, &*logger) {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `PackageTemplate` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/package.rs:1191:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1169 |         let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1191 |                 let package = PackageTemplate::build_package(txid, 0, counterparty_outp, 1000, true, 100);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::Vec<Event>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs:1730:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1676 |     node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, payment_failed_event: Event, expected_payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 --------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1730 |         let events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::Vec<Event>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs:1773:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 459  |             let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 651  |             let mut added_monitors = $node.chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1268 |             let (bs_revoke_and_ack, extra_msg_option) = {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                     ---------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 1269 |                 let events = $node_b.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1300 |             let (extra_msg_option, bs_revoke_and_ack) = commitment_signed_dance!($node_a, $node_b, (), $fail_backwards, true, true, true);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  ---------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1318 |                 let channel_state = $node_a.node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1386 |         let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |             ------
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1396 |             expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(events, expected_failures)
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       ------
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1404 |         for event in $events {
[INFO] [stdout]      |             -----
[INFO] [stdout]      |             |
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |             these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1773 |             let events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: for more information, see issue #123739 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123739>
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: this value of type `std::vec::Drain<'_, (Option<ChannelReady>, Option<RevokeAndACK>, Option<CommitmentUpdate>, RAACommitmentOrder)>` has significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs:2635:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 459  |             let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 488  |             let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ------ these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 651  |             let mut added_monitors = $node.chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ------------------
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 1268 |             let (bs_revoke_and_ack, extra_msg_option) = {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                     ---------------- these local bindings with significant drop implementation may observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
[INFO] [stdout] 1269 |                 let events = $node_b.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
[WARN] too many lines in the log, truncating it