[INFO] fetching crate rkyv-test 0.7.38-test.2... [INFO] checking rkyv-test-0.7.38-test.2 against try#4d98531622e1718ae0bc3c7a1ab9cd8938428452+rustflags=-Dtail_expr_drop_order for pr-129604 [INFO] extracting crate rkyv-test 0.7.38-test.2 into /workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source [INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate rkyv-test 0.7.38-test.2 on toolchain 4d98531622e1718ae0bc3c7a1ab9cd8938428452 [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4d98531622e1718ae0bc3c7a1ab9cd8938428452" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate rkyv-test 0.7.38-test.2 [INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate rkyv-test 0.7.38-test.2 [INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate rkyv-test 0.7.38-test.2 written to /workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source/Cargo.toml [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4d98531622e1718ae0bc3c7a1ab9cd8938428452" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Updating crates.io index [INFO] [stderr] Locking 27 packages to latest compatible versions [INFO] [stderr] Adding ahash v0.7.8 (latest: v0.8.11) [INFO] [stderr] Adding bytecheck v0.6.12 (latest: v0.7.0) [INFO] [stderr] Adding bytecheck_derive v0.6.12 (latest: v0.7.0) [INFO] [stderr] Adding hashbrown v0.12.3 (latest: v0.14.5) [INFO] [stderr] Adding indexmap v1.9.3 (latest: v2.5.0) [INFO] [stderr] Adding ptr_meta v0.1.4 (latest: v0.2.0) [INFO] [stderr] Adding ptr_meta_derive v0.1.4 (latest: v0.2.0) [INFO] [stderr] Adding rend v0.3.6 (latest: v0.4.2) [INFO] [stderr] Adding rkyv_derive_test v0.7.38-test.2 (latest: v0.7.39) [INFO] [stderr] Adding syn v1.0.109 (latest: v2.0.77) [INFO] [stderr] Adding wasi v0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1 (latest: v0.13.2+wasi-0.2.1) [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4d98531622e1718ae0bc3c7a1ab9cd8938428452" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:923055f121b5182466d55868a8b05e67af8ba4a3a3f6bad814e953ca3cd3ac2a" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4d98531622e1718ae0bc3c7a1ab9cd8938428452" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 13a2b39212572b412f098a5320e1d3087af5d46648909131067b82283484d439 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "13a2b39212572b412f098a5320e1d3087af5d46648909131067b82283484d439", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "13a2b39212572b412f098a5320e1d3087af5d46648909131067b82283484d439", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "13a2b39212572b412f098a5320e1d3087af5d46648909131067b82283484d439", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 13a2b39212572b412f098a5320e1d3087af5d46648909131067b82283484d439 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-4-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid -Dtail_expr_drop_order" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:923055f121b5182466d55868a8b05e67af8ba4a3a3f6bad814e953ca3cd3ac2a" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+4d98531622e1718ae0bc3c7a1ab9cd8938428452" "check" "--frozen" "--all" "--all-targets" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 555d8d215c9419021195b75e0bbae5e6f541522a98c9981b99d78264ead0698f [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "555d8d215c9419021195b75e0bbae5e6f541522a98c9981b99d78264ead0698f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Compiling syn v1.0.109 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling ahash v0.7.8 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling bytecheck v0.6.12 [INFO] [stderr] Checking getrandom v0.2.15 [INFO] [stderr] Checking simdutf8 v0.1.4 [INFO] [stderr] Checking once_cell v1.19.0 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling rend v0.3.6 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling rkyv-test v0.7.38-test.2 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stderr] Checking seahash v4.1.0 [INFO] [stderr] Checking hashbrown v0.12.3 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling ptr_meta_derive v0.1.4 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling bytecheck_derive v0.6.12 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling rkyv_derive_test v0.7.38-test.2 [INFO] [stderr] Checking ptr_meta v0.1.4 [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:8:33 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 8 | #[cfg(all(not(feature = "std"), has_atomics))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:13:28 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", has_atomics))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:130:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 130 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:133:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 133 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:141:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:152:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 152 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:164:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 164 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:183:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 183 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:197:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 197 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:213:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 213 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:230:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 230 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:2:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 2 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:7:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:77:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 77 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:141:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:143:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 143 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:145:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 145 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:171:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 171 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:173:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 173 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:175:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 175 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:177:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 177 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:179:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 179 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:181:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 181 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:345:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 345 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:356:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 356 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:364:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 364 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:374:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 374 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:385:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 385 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:393:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 393 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:2:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 2 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:38:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:90:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 90 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:92:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:94:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:96:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 96 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:98:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 98 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:100:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 100 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:126:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 126 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:128:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 128 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:130:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 130 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:132:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 132 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:134:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 134 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:136:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 136 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:8:33 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 8 | #[cfg(all(not(feature = "std"), has_atomics))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `docsrs`, `doctest`, `feature`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:13:28 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", has_atomics))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:130:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 130 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:133:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 133 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:141:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:152:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 152 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:164:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 164 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:183:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 183 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:197:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 197 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:213:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 213 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:230:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 230 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:2:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 2 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:7:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:77:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 77 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:141:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 141 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:143:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 143 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:145:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 145 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:171:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 171 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:173:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 173 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:175:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 175 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:177:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 177 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/mod.rs:8:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 8 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:179:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 179 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:8:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 8 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:74:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 74 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:181:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 181 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:78:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 78 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:85:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 85 | #[cfg(any(has_atomics_64, not(feature = "size_64")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:345:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 345 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:356:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 356 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:364:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 364 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:374:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 374 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:385:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 385 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/primitive.rs:393:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 393 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:2:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 2 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:38:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:90:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 90 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:92:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:94:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:96:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 96 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:98:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 98 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:100:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 100 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:126:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 126 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:128:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 128 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:130:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 130 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:132:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 132 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:138:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 138 | #[cfg(any(has_atomics_64, not(feature = "size_64")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:90:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 90 | #[cfg(not(has_atomics_64))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:92:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:143:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 143 | #[cfg(not(has_atomics_64))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:145:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 145 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:134:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 134 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unused import: `self::alloc::*` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/mod.rs:15:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 15 | pub use self::alloc::*; [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unused_imports)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unused import: `self::std::*` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/mod.rs:17:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 17 | pub use self::std::*; [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/rend.rs:136:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 136 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/mod.rs:8:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 8 | #[cfg(has_atomics)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:8:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 8 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:74:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 74 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:78:7 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 78 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:85:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 85 | #[cfg(any(has_atomics_64, not(feature = "size_64")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:138:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 138 | #[cfg(any(has_atomics_64, not(feature = "size_64")))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:90:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 90 | #[cfg(not(has_atomics_64))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:92:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 92 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:143:15 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 143 | #[cfg(not(has_atomics_64))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_atomics_64` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/atomic.rs:145:11 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 145 | #[cfg(has_atomics_64)] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_atomics_64)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(has_atomics_64)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unused import: `self::alloc::*` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/mod.rs:15:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 15 | pub use self::alloc::*; [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unused_imports)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unused import: `self::std::*` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/mod.rs:17:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 17 | pub use self::std::*; [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/boxed.rs:25:50 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 25 | unsafe { self.map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut *s.0.as_mut_ptr()) } [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: requested on the command line with `-D tail-expr-drop-order` [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/collections/hash_map/mod.rs:133:59 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 133 | .map(move |index| Pin::new_unchecked(&mut hash_map.entry_mut(index).value)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:61:37 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 61 | |ptr| rc::Rc::::from(unsafe { Box::from_raw(ptr) }), [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:174:40 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 174 | |ptr| sync::Arc::::from(unsafe { Box::from_raw(ptr) }), [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/option.rs:98:33 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 97 | pub fn get_or_insert(&mut self, v: T) -> &mut T { [INFO] [stdout] | ---- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 98 | self.get_or_insert_with(move || v) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/rc/mod.rs:35:41 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 35 | self.map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut *s.0.as_mut_ptr()) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/ser/serializers/mod.rs:161:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 159 | resolver: T::Resolver, [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 160 | ) -> Result { [INFO] [stdout] 161 | / self.serializer [INFO] [stdout] 162 | | .resolve_aligned::(value, resolver) [INFO] [stdout] | |__________________________________________________^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/ser/serializers/mod.rs:173:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 171 | metadata_resolver: T::MetadataResolver, [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 172 | ) -> Result { [INFO] [stdout] 173 | / self.serializer [INFO] [stdout] 174 | | .resolve_unsized_aligned(value, to, metadata_resolver) [INFO] [stdout] | |__________________________________________________________________^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/mod.rs:296:8 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 294 | let mut serializer = AllocSerializer::::default(); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 295 | serializer.serialize_value(value)?; [INFO] [stdout] 296 | Ok(serializer.into_serializer().into_inner()) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/aligned_vec.rs:618:10 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 617 | fn index(&self, index: I) -> &Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 618 | &self.as_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/aligned_vec.rs:625:14 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 624 | fn index_mut(&mut self, index: I) -> &mut Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 625 | &mut self.as_mut_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/scratch_vec.rs:385:10 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 384 | fn index(&self, index: I) -> &Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 385 | &self.as_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/scratch_vec.rs:392:14 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 391 | fn index_mut(&mut self, index: I) -> &mut Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 392 | &mut self.as_mut_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/alloc.rs:512:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 506 | let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(field.len()); [INFO] [stdout] | ------ these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 512 | Ok(result.into_boxed_slice()) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: aborting due to 26 previous errors; 55 warnings emitted [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] error: could not compile `rkyv-test` (lib test) due to 27 previous errors; 55 warnings emitted [INFO] [stderr] warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish... [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/boxed.rs:25:50 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 25 | unsafe { self.map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut *s.0.as_mut_ptr()) } [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: requested on the command line with `-D tail-expr-drop-order` [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/collections/hash_map/mod.rs:133:59 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 133 | .map(move |index| Pin::new_unchecked(&mut hash_map.entry_mut(index).value)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:61:37 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 61 | |ptr| rc::Rc::::from(unsafe { Box::from_raw(ptr) }), [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/alloc/rc.rs:174:40 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 174 | |ptr| sync::Arc::::from(unsafe { Box::from_raw(ptr) }), [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/impls/core/mod.rs:105:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 104 | let rev = ($(self.$index.serialize(serializer)?,)+); [INFO] [stdout] | --- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 105 | Ok(($(rev.$index,)+)) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] | these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 125 | impl_tuple! { T11 11, T10 10, T9 9, T8 8, T7 7, T6 6, T5 5, T4 4, T3 3, T2 2, T1 1, T0 0, } [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] = note: this error originates in the macro `impl_tuple` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/option.rs:98:33 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 97 | pub fn get_or_insert(&mut self, v: T) -> &mut T { [INFO] [stdout] | ---- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 98 | self.get_or_insert_with(move || v) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/rc/mod.rs:35:41 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 35 | self.map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut *s.0.as_mut_ptr()) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/ser/serializers/mod.rs:161:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 159 | resolver: T::Resolver, [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 160 | ) -> Result { [INFO] [stdout] 161 | / self.serializer [INFO] [stdout] 162 | | .resolve_aligned::(value, resolver) [INFO] [stdout] | |__________________________________________________^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/ser/serializers/mod.rs:173:9 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 171 | metadata_resolver: T::MetadataResolver, [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------------------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 172 | ) -> Result { [INFO] [stdout] 173 | / self.serializer [INFO] [stdout] 174 | | .resolve_unsized_aligned(value, to, metadata_resolver) [INFO] [stdout] | |__________________________________________________________________^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/mod.rs:296:8 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 294 | let mut serializer = AllocSerializer::::default(); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 295 | serializer.serialize_value(value)?; [INFO] [stdout] 296 | Ok(serializer.into_serializer().into_inner()) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/aligned_vec.rs:618:10 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 617 | fn index(&self, index: I) -> &Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 618 | &self.as_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/aligned_vec.rs:625:14 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 624 | fn index_mut(&mut self, index: I) -> &mut Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 625 | &mut self.as_mut_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/scratch_vec.rs:385:10 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 384 | fn index(&self, index: I) -> &Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 385 | &self.as_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/util/scratch_vec.rs:392:14 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 391 | fn index_mut(&mut self, index: I) -> &mut Self::Output { [INFO] [stdout] | -------- these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] 392 | &mut self.as_mut_slice()[index] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021 [INFO] [stdout] --> src/with/alloc.rs:512:12 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 506 | let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(field.len()); [INFO] [stdout] | ------ these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024 [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 512 | Ok(result.into_boxed_slice()) [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = warning: this changes meaning in Rust 2024 [INFO] [stdout] = note: for more information, see issue #123739 [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] error: aborting due to 26 previous errors; 55 warnings emitted [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] error: could not compile `rkyv-test` (lib) due to 27 previous errors; 55 warnings emitted [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "555d8d215c9419021195b75e0bbae5e6f541522a98c9981b99d78264ead0698f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "555d8d215c9419021195b75e0bbae5e6f541522a98c9981b99d78264ead0698f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 555d8d215c9419021195b75e0bbae5e6f541522a98c9981b99d78264ead0698f