[INFO] cloning repository https://github.com/SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025
[INFO] running `Command { std: "git" "-c" "credential.helper=" "-c" "credential.helper=/workspace/cargo-home/bin/git-credential-null" "clone" "--bare" "https://github.com/SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025" "/workspace/cache/git-repos/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FSanderKnauff%2Fadvent-of-code-2025", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr] Cloning into bare repository '/workspace/cache/git-repos/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FSanderKnauff%2Fadvent-of-code-2025'...
[INFO] running `Command { std: "git" "rev-parse" "HEAD", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] ac5c990907a57c52dd9ee2af1cca0d4410fc8177
[INFO] checking SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025 against a5689b034ad287112f709693384a37f1377eb9cc for pr-129249-3
[INFO] running `Command { std: "git" "clone" "/workspace/cache/git-repos/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FSanderKnauff%2Fadvent-of-code-2025" "/workspace/builds/worker-7-tc2/source", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr] Cloning into '/workspace/builds/worker-7-tc2/source'...
[INFO] [stderr] done.
[INFO] started tweaking git repo https://github.com/SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025
[INFO] finished tweaking git repo https://github.com/SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025
[INFO] tweaked toml for git repo https://github.com/SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025 written to /workspace/builds/worker-7-tc2/source/Cargo.toml
[INFO] validating manifest of git repo https://github.com/SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025 on toolchain a5689b034ad287112f709693384a37f1377eb9cc
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+a5689b034ad287112f709693384a37f1377eb9cc" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] crate git repo https://github.com/SanderKnauff/advent-of-code-2025 already has a lockfile, it will not be regenerated
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+a5689b034ad287112f709693384a37f1377eb9cc" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-7-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-7-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-m" "1610612736" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:77db811e55d90add9212f6832c23229e3de5f1c1f9905e8cb07319ea15df73ac" "sleep" "infinity", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "exec" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "--user" "0:0" "7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+a5689b034ad287112f709693384a37f1377eb9cc" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "exec" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=forbid" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "--user" "0:0" "7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+a5689b034ad287112f709693384a37f1377eb9cc" "check" "--frozen" "--all" "--all-targets" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]     Checking aoc-2025 v0.1.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir)
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/day8.rs:62:39
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 62 | ...   let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid f...
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[deny(self_type_conversion)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 62 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 62 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 62 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 62 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.first_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/day8.rs:63:41
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 | ...   let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invali...
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 63 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 63 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.second_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/day8.rs:114:39
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 | ...   let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid ...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 114 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 114 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.first_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/day8.rs:115:41
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 115 | ...   let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has inval...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 115 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 115 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 115 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 115 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.second_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr] error: could not compile `aoc-2025` (bin "aoc-2025") due to 4 previous errors
[INFO] [stderr] warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/day8.rs:62:39
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 62 | ...   let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid f...
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[deny(self_type_conversion)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 62 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 62 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 62 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 62 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.first_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/day8.rs:63:41
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 | ...   let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invali...
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 63 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 63 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.second_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/day8.rs:114:39
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 | ...   let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid ...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 114 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 -         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.first_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 114 +         let one = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.first_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid first_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.first_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/day8.rs:115:41
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 115 | ...   let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has inval...
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 115 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 115 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 115 -         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&distance.second_box.clone().into()).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout] 115 +         let other = circuit_lookup.get(&<JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(distance.second_box.clone())).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Distance {distance:?} has invalid second_box, circuit lookup does not have an entry for point {:?}", distance.second_box));
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] error: useless conversion to the same type: `JunctionBox`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/day8.rs:290:37
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 290 |     let hashed_point: JunctionBox = junction_box.into();
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this method call relies on the `impl<T> Into<T> for T` blanket implementation and type inference, which is a semver hazard as a new `impl Into<_>` that affects your type might be added in the future causing type inference errors
[INFO] [stdout] help: consider removing the conversion call
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 290 -     let hashed_point: JunctionBox = junction_box.into();
[INFO] [stdout] 290 +     let hashed_point: JunctionBox = junction_box;
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] help: you can use the fully-qualified path to avoid triggering this lint
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 290 -     let hashed_point: JunctionBox = junction_box.into();
[INFO] [stdout] 290 +     let hashed_point: JunctionBox = <JunctionBox as Into<_>>::into(junction_box);
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr] error: could not compile `aoc-2025` (bin "aoc-2025" test) due to 5 previous errors
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 7359835f341448b67555bc1bb2f312a80dad4496c4b394401ba5f62df2bec63a
