[INFO] fetching crate process_control 5.2.0...
[INFO] testing process_control-5.2.0 against beta-2026-04-21 for beta-1.96-2
[INFO] extracting crate process_control 5.2.0 into /workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/source
[INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0
[INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0
[INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 written to /workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/source/Cargo.toml
[INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 on toolchain beta-2026-04-21
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2026-04-21" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] crate crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 already has a lockfile, it will not be regenerated
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2026-04-21" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:d429b63d4308055ea97f60fb1d3dfca48854a00942f1bd2ad806beaf015945ec" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2026-04-21" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] ff3c659cae83e1bc368d42d0a2d9b44b3440eced8e08a5eca864d1419c99e913
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "ff3c659cae83e1bc368d42d0a2d9b44b3440eced8e08a5eca864d1419c99e913", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "ff3c659cae83e1bc368d42d0a2d9b44b3440eced8e08a5eca864d1419c99e913", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "ff3c659cae83e1bc368d42d0a2d9b44b3440eced8e08a5eca864d1419c99e913", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] ff3c659cae83e1bc368d42d0a2d9b44b3440eced8e08a5eca864d1419c99e913
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:d429b63d4308055ea97f60fb1d3dfca48854a00942f1bd2ad806beaf015945ec" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2026-04-21" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 95e737976aaad79597aa81b4d9c8f1abe1fb20efbc60e1ae46e94f5374870cfa
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "95e737976aaad79597aa81b4d9c8f1abe1fb20efbc60e1ae46e94f5374870cfa", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libc v0.2.175
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling attr_alias v0.1.4
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling process_control v5.2.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir)
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:86:13
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 159 |     unix_method!(continued, bool);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 160 |     unix_method!(core_dumped, bool);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 161 |     unix_method!(signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 162 |     unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:421:1
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval]
[INFO] [stdout]     | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr]     Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 2.03s
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "95e737976aaad79597aa81b4d9c8f1abe1fb20efbc60e1ae46e94f5374870cfa", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "95e737976aaad79597aa81b4d9c8f1abe1fb20efbc60e1ae46e94f5374870cfa", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 95e737976aaad79597aa81b4d9c8f1abe1fb20efbc60e1ae46e94f5374870cfa
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:d429b63d4308055ea97f60fb1d3dfca48854a00942f1bd2ad806beaf015945ec" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2026-04-21" "test" "--frozen" "--no-run" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 9e6fa99359e31bac378ff732a4672ecd84c8e2142aca86543a2a3316fc76dd30
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "9e6fa99359e31bac378ff732a4672ecd84c8e2142aca86543a2a3316fc76dd30", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling process_control v5.2.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir)
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:86:13
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 159 |     unix_method!(continued, bool);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 160 |     unix_method!(core_dumped, bool);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 161 |     unix_method!(signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 162 |     unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:421:1
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval]
[INFO] [stdout]     | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:86:13
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 159 |     unix_method!(continued, bool);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 160 |     unix_method!(core_dumped, bool);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 161 |     unix_method!(signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 162 |     unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:421:1
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval]
[INFO] [stdout]     | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr]     Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.65s
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "9e6fa99359e31bac378ff732a4672ecd84c8e2142aca86543a2a3316fc76dd30", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "9e6fa99359e31bac378ff732a4672ecd84c8e2142aca86543a2a3316fc76dd30", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 9e6fa99359e31bac378ff732a4672ecd84c8e2142aca86543a2a3316fc76dd30
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-1-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:d429b63d4308055ea97f60fb1d3dfca48854a00942f1bd2ad806beaf015945ec" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2026-04-21" "test" "--frozen", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 95754fca1ea3fc268043a1d5dc241468badaca21670b3f6ca6014d7b49302e8a
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "95754fca1ea3fc268043a1d5dc241468badaca21670b3f6ca6014d7b49302e8a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stderr]   --> src/lib.rs:86:13
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))]
[INFO] [stderr]    |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]    |
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stderr]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stderr]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stderr]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stderr]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stderr]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr] ...
[INFO] [stderr] 159 |     unix_method!(continued, bool);
[INFO] [stderr]     |     ----------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stderr]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stderr]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stderr]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stderr]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr] ...
[INFO] [stderr] 160 |     unix_method!(core_dumped, bool);
[INFO] [stderr]     |     ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stderr]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stderr]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stderr]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stderr]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr] ...
[INFO] [stderr] 161 |     unix_method!(signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stderr]     |     ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stderr]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stderr]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stderr]    --> src/lib.rs:121:20
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr] 121 |         #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))]
[INFO] [stderr]     |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr] ...
[INFO] [stderr] 162 |     unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option<c_int>);
[INFO] [stderr]     |     ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stderr]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stderr]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] }
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs`
[INFO] [stderr]    --> src/lib.rs:421:1
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval]
[INFO] [stderr]     | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stderr]     |
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
[INFO] [stderr]     = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias`
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stderr]     = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stderr] 
[INFO] [stderr] warning: `process_control` (lib) generated 6 warnings
[INFO] [stderr] warning: `process_control` (lib test) generated 6 warnings (6 duplicates)
[INFO] [stderr]     Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.04s
[INFO] [stderr]      Running unittests src/lib.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/process_control-888a79822a311100)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] running 0 tests
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stderr]    Doc-tests process_control
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] running 6 tests
[INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - Output::into_std_lossy (line 252) ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - PipeFilter (line 383) ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - ChildExt::controlled (line 540) ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - ExitStatus::into_std_lossy (line 174) ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - ChildExt::controlled_with_output (line 570) ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - (line 49) ... ok
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 6 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.89s
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "95754fca1ea3fc268043a1d5dc241468badaca21670b3f6ca6014d7b49302e8a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "95754fca1ea3fc268043a1d5dc241468badaca21670b3f6ca6014d7b49302e8a", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 95754fca1ea3fc268043a1d5dc241468badaca21670b3f6ca6014d7b49302e8a
