[INFO] fetching crate lightning 0.1.5...
[INFO] testing lightning-0.1.5 against 1.90.0 for beta-1.91-3
[INFO] extracting crate lightning 0.1.5 into /workspace/builds/worker-0-tc1/source
[INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate lightning 0.1.5
[INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate lightning 0.1.5
[INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate lightning 0.1.5 written to /workspace/builds/worker-0-tc1/source/Cargo.toml
[INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate lightning 0.1.5 on toolchain 1.90.0
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]     Updating crates.io index
[INFO] [stderr]      Locking 97 packages to latest compatible versions
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding criterion v0.4.0 (available: v0.7.0)
[INFO] [stderr]       Adding hashbrown v0.13.2 (available: v0.16.0)
[INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]  Downloading crates ...
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded hex_lit v0.1.1
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded bitcoin-io v0.1.3
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded hex-conservative v0.2.1
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded bitcoin_hashes v0.14.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded ciborium-io v0.2.2
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded possiblyrandom v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded base58ck v0.1.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded clap_lex v0.2.4
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded cast v0.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded ciborium-ll v0.2.2
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded oorandom v11.1.5
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded anes v0.1.6
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded os_str_bytes v6.6.1
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded textwrap v0.16.2
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded lightning-invoice v0.33.2
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded bech32 v0.11.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded criterion v0.4.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded hashbrown v0.13.2
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded secp256k1 v0.29.1
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded ciborium v0.2.2
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded tinytemplate v1.2.1
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded clap v3.2.25
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded bitcoin-units v0.1.2
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded criterion-plot v0.5.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded bitcoin-internals v0.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded lightning-types v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded bitcoin v0.32.7
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded dnssec-prover v0.6.8
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded secp256k1-sys v0.10.1
[INFO] [stderr]   Downloaded bitcoinconsensus v0.105.0+25.1
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-0-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-0-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 6267cfc378a47ca4f39de4f2c990a25317d4729afb774149796603d793fa270b
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "6267cfc378a47ca4f39de4f2c990a25317d4729afb774149796603d793fa270b", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "6267cfc378a47ca4f39de4f2c990a25317d4729afb774149796603d793fa270b", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "6267cfc378a47ca4f39de4f2c990a25317d4729afb774149796603d793fa270b", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 6267cfc378a47ca4f39de4f2c990a25317d4729afb774149796603d793fa270b
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-0-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-0-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stdout] 277a82f616fdf6303221b5d3f9a13dbbd09e108831886e0383ced9555f9a054b
[INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "277a82f616fdf6303221b5d3f9a13dbbd09e108831886e0383ced9555f9a054b", kill_on_drop: false }`
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitcoin-io v0.1.3
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling arrayvec v0.7.6
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitcoin-internals v0.3.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hex_lit v0.1.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitcoin v0.32.7
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bech32 v0.11.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libm v0.2.15
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling dnssec-prover v0.6.8
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hashbrown v0.13.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling libc v0.2.176
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling secp256k1-sys v0.10.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitcoin-units v0.1.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling hex-conservative v0.2.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling bitcoin_hashes v0.14.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling getrandom v0.2.16
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling possiblyrandom v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling base58ck v0.1.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling secp256k1 v0.29.1
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling lightning-types v0.2.0
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling lightning-invoice v0.33.2
[INFO] [stderr]    Compiling lightning v0.1.5 (/opt/rustwide/workdir)
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:32:27
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 32 | #![cfg_attr(not(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils")), deny(missing_docs))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:48:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 48 | #[cfg(all(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/lib.rs:67:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 67 | #[cfg(ldk_bench)] extern crate criterion;
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/lib.rs:146:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 146 | #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), feature = "backtrace", feature = "std", test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:25:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/mod.rs:27:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/ser.rs:46:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 46 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/ser.rs:1104:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1104 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/ser.rs:1111:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1111 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/ser.rs:1119:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1119 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/ser.rs:1127:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1127 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/wakers.rs:176:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 176 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/base32.rs:67:9
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 67 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/base32.rs:124:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 124 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/base32.rs:161:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 161 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/logger.rs:23:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 23 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:156:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 156 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:158:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 158 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:111:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 111 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 157 | impl_record!('a, );
[INFO] [stdout]     | ------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `impl_record` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:114:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 157 | impl_record!('a, );
[INFO] [stdout]     | ------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `impl_record` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:144:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 144 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 157 | impl_record!('a, );
[INFO] [stdout]     | ------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `impl_record` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/logger.rs:146:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 146 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 157 | impl_record!('a, );
[INFO] [stdout]     | ------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `impl_record` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/util/config.rs:16:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 16 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/config.rs:226:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 226 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/config.rs:353:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 353 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/config.rs:881:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 881 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:451:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 451 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:462:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 462 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/chainmonitor.rs:536:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 536 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:2808:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2808 |                 assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
[INFO] [stdout]      |                              ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:3602:25
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3602 |                     debug_assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "We should have per-commitment option for any recognized old commitment txn");
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                        ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4526:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4526 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4529:14
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4529 |             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4628 | /                 scan_commitment!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4629 | |                     "our latest holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |____________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4633 | /                     scan_commitment!(prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref())),
[INFO] [stdout] 4634 | |                         "our previous holder commitment tx", true);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |__________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4542:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4542 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4544:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4544 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/chain/channelmonitor.rs:4548:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4548 |                       #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] // Note that the fuzzer is not bound by pesky things like "signatures"
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 4638 | /                 scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, ref b)| (a, b.as_ref().map(|boxed| &**boxed))),
[INFO] [stdout] 4639 | |                     "counterparty commitment tx", false);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `log_claim` which comes from the expansion of the macro `scan_commitment` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/chain/onchaintx.rs:867:24
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 867 |                 debug_assert!(cfg!(fuzzing) || self.pending_claim_requests.get(&claim_id).is_none());
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:33:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 33 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:35:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:38:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 38 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/mod.rs:40:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 40 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:52:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 52 | #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:52:25
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 52 | #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                         ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:75:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 75 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:97:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 97 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:106:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 106 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1476:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1476 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1511:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1511 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:15841:7
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 15841 | #[cfg(ldk_bench)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |       ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1416:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1416 |     #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:523:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 523 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:532:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 532 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_test_vectors`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:680:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 680 |     #[cfg(all(ldk_test_vectors, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_test_vectors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_test_vectors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:1422:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1422 |     #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:4795:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4795 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:4855:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4855 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:6395:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6395 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:9451:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 9451 |     #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:3606:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3606 |             if cfg!(fuzzing) { // fuzzing chacha20 doesn't use the key at all so we always get the same alias
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:3695:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3695 |                 if cfg!(fuzzing) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:7742:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7742 |                     #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:7899:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7899 |             #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:7977:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7977 |                     #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:7987:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7987 |                     #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:8023:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8023 |             #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:10003:12
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10003 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]       |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:10005:12
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10005 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]       |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:10008:8
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10008 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:10010:8
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10010 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:11390:8
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 11390 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:11397:8
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 11397 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:11404:8
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 11404 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:11323:9
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 11323 |         #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:11336:13
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 11336 |         #[cfg(not(dual_funding))]
[INFO] [stdout]       |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:12172:10
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 12172 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:12126:14
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 12126 |                             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |                                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:12017:12
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 12017 |                     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 12170 |                 handle_pay_invoice_res!(res, invoice, logger);
[INFO] [stdout]       |                 --------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: this warning originates in the macro `handle_pay_invoice_res` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:12241:9
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 12241 |         #[cfg(async_payments)] {
[INFO] [stdout]       |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:12396:8
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 12396 |     #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]       |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/inbound_payment.rs:196:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 196 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/msgs.rs:68:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 68 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1884:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1884 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1886:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1886 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2308:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2308 | #[cfg(not(taproot))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2317:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2317 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2333:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2333 | #[cfg(not(taproot))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2340:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2340 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2351:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2351 | #[cfg(not(taproot))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2357:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2357 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2590:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2590 | #[cfg(not(taproot))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2597:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2597 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/msgs.rs:369:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 369 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/msgs.rs:406:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 406 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/msgs.rs:409:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 409 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/msgs.rs:425:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 425 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/msgs.rs:776:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 776 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/msgs.rs:792:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 792 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1522:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1522 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1525:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1525 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:1528:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1528 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2038:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2038 |         #[cfg(not(taproot))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2043:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2043 |         #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2072:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2072 |         #[cfg(not(taproot))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2077:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2077 |         #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2079:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2079 |         #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/msgs.rs:2105:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2105 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:51:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 51 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:707:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 707 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:726:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 726 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:184:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 184 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:186:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 186 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:287:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 287 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:291:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 291 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:295:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 295 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:345:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 345 |         #[cfg(dual_funding)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1854:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1854 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1859:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1859 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/peer_handler.rs:1863:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1863 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1200:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1200 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1200:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1200 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1334:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1334 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1334:3
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1334 |         hash_to_message!(sighash)
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1757:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1757 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).p2wsh_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.to_bitcoin_amount(), EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1757:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1757 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).p2wsh_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.to_bitcoin_amount(), EcdsaSighashType::All).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/channel.rs:71:17
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 71 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, debug_assertions))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1065:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1065 | #[cfg(any(fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1067:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1067 | #[cfg(not(any(fuzzing, test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4218:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4218 | #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1429:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1429 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:1431:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1431 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `dual_funding`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4079:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4079 |     #[cfg(all(test, dual_funding))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(dual_funding)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(dual_funding)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2189:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2189 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2191:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2191 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2419:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2419 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2421:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2421 |             #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3708:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3708 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3799:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3799 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3946:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3946 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:3961:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3961 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4041:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4041 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:4074:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4074 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5058:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5058 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5088:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5088 |         #[cfg(all(feature = "std", any(test, fuzzing)))] {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                              ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5105:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5105 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).p2wsh_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.to_bitcoin_amount(), htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:5105:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5105 | ... = hash_to_message!(&sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).p2wsh_signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, htlc.to_bitcoin_amount(), htlc_sighashtype).unwrap()[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5432:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5432 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:5446:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 5446 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6187:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6187 |                 #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:6767:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 6767 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:7308:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7308 |                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:7380:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7380 |                                 #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:7393:22
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7393 |                                             #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:7666:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7666 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:7696:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7696 |                 #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:7713:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7713 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/ln/channel.rs:7713:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 7713 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256d::hash(&announcement.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8014:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8014 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8039:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8039 |         #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8089:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8089 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8084:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8084 |                     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8313:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8313 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8330:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8330 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8332:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8332 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:8700:10
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8700 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channel.rs:10172:21
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10172 |                 #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]       |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channel.rs:10174:21
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10174 |                 #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]       |                                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]                [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]                unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/outbound_payment.rs:35:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 35 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/outbound_payment.rs:560:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 560 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/outbound_payment.rs:696:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 696 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/outbound_payment.rs:711:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 711 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/outbound_payment.rs:968:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 968 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/outbound_payment.rs:1049:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1049 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:432:36
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 432 | #[cfg(any(feature = "_test_utils", fuzzing, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/wire.rs:63:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 63 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/wire.rs:65:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 65 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/ln/wire.rs:67:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 67 |     #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:121:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 121 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:123:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 123 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:125:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 125 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:179:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 179 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:181:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 181 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:183:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 183 |             #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:282:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 282 |         #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:289:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 289 |         #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `splicing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/wire.rs:293:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 293 |         #[cfg(splicing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(splicing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(splicing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/offers/mod.rs:28:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 28 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:101:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 101 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:105:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 105 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:181:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 181 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:194:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 194 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:513:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 513 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, not(test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:519:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 519 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:526:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 526 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, not(test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:532:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 532 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:539:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 539 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:549:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 549 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:769:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 769 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:774:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 774 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:449:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 449 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 499 |     offer_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     --------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:451:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 451 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 499 |     offer_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     --------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:724:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 724 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:751:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 751 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 771 |     request_invoice_derived_signing_pubkey!(self, InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, T>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `request_invoice_derived_signing_pubkey` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:755:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 755 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 771 |     request_invoice_derived_signing_pubkey!(self, InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, T>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `request_invoice_derived_signing_pubkey` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:757:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 757 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 771 |     request_invoice_derived_signing_pubkey!(self, InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, T>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `request_invoice_derived_signing_pubkey` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:172:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 172 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:188:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 188 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:415:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 415 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, not(test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:422:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 422 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:431:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 431 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, not(test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:438:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 438 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:447:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 447 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:461:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 461 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:597:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 597 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:602:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 602 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:214:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 214 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:230:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 230 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:262:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 262 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))] {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:265:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 265 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)] {
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 398 |     invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_explicit_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:272:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 272 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 402 |     invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:289:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 289 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 402 |     invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:325:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 325 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 402 |     invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:327:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 327 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 402 |     invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_derived_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:358:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 358 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 406 |     invoice_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, S, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     -------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:371:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 371 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 406 |     invoice_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, S, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     -------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:580:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 580 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 599 |     unsigned_invoice_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:582:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 582 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 599 |     unsigned_invoice_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:584:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 584 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 599 |     unsigned_invoice_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:586:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 586 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 599 |     unsigned_invoice_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:589:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 589 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 599 |     unsigned_invoice_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:591:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 591 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 599 |     unsigned_invoice_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:90:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 90 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:94:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 94 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:126:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 126 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:402:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 402 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, not(test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:408:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 408 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:415:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 415 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:547:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 547 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:552:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 552 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:827:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 827 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:840:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 840 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:1326:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1326 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:1330:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1330 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:137:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 137 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 395 |     invoice_request_derived_payer_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self, T);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_derived_payer_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:174:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 174 |     #[cfg_attr(c_bindings, allow(dead_code))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 396 |     invoice_request_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, T, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:156:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 156 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 395 |     invoice_request_derived_payer_signing_pubkey_builder_methods!(self, Self, T);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_derived_payer_signing_pubkey_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:313:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 313 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 396 |     invoice_request_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, T, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:315:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 315 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 396 |     invoice_request_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, T, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ---------------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:534:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 534 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 549 |     unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:536:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 536 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 549 |     unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:538:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 538 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 549 |     unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:540:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 540 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 549 |     unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method!(self, Self, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `unsigned_invoice_request_sign_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:834:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 834 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:775:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 775 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:779:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 779 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:781:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 781 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:788:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 788 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:790:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 790 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:804:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 804 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:808:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 |         #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:810:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 810 |         #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:818:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 818 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:820:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 820 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 832 |     invoice_request_verify_method!(self, Self);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_verify_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:927:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 927 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:929:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 929 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:931:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 931 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:933:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 933 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/offers/parse.rs:21:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 21 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/offers/parse.rs:24:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 24 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:110:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 110 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:114:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:145:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 145 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:395:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 395 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, not(test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:401:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 401 | #[cfg(all(c_bindings, test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:408:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 408 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:418:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 418 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:655:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 655 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:661:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 661 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:347:14
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 347 |             #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 389 |     refund_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, T, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `refund_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:349:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 349 |             #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 389 |     refund_builder_methods!(self, Self, Self, self, T, mut);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `refund_builder_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/offers/signer.rs:44:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 44 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/signer.rs:455:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 455 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/signer.rs:462:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 462 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/signer.rs:366:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 366 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/signer.rs:379:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 379 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/signer.rs:402:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 402 |         if !cfg!(fuzzing) {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                  ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:4469:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 4469 | #[cfg(ldk_bench)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:495:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 495 |     let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&message_sha256d_hash(&msg.contents)[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ---------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:495:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 495 |     let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&message_sha256d_hash(&msg.contents)[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ---------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:513:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 513 |     let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&message_sha256d_hash(&msg.contents)[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ---------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]  16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:513:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 513 |     let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&message_sha256d_hash(&msg.contents)[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ---------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2582:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2582 |             let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&message_sha256d_hash(&msg)[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/routing/gossip.rs:2582:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2582 |             let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&message_sha256d_hash(&msg)[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                            ------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:2668:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2668 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `channels`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/gossip.rs:2686:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2686 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)] // Non-bindings users should use `nodes`
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/routing/router.rs:22:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:8889:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 8889 | #[cfg(any(test, ldk_bench))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:9049:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 9049 | #[cfg(ldk_bench)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1789:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1789 |     #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:1789:38
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1789 |     #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/router.rs:898:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 898 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2996:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2996 |                 #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                               ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2996:41
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2996 |                 #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:3025:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3025 |                     #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                   ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:3025:42
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3025 |                     #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                         ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3043 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3044 | |                 payee_node_counter, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0
[INFO] [stdout] 3045 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3068 |               if let Some(hop_used_msat) = add_entry!(&candidate,
[INFO] [stdout]      |  __________________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 3069 | |                 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0_u64, 0, 0)
[INFO] [stdout]      | |___________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3098 | /                     add_entry!(&first_hop_candidate, blinded_path_fee, path_contribution_msat, path_min,
[INFO] [stdout] 3099 | |                         0_u64, candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(), 0);
[INFO] [stdout]      | |________________________________________________________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                             ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2510:40
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2510 |               #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:21
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                         ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2689:43
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2689 |                           #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2680:45
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2680 |                                   #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2778:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2778 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:24
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/router.rs:2802:46
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2802 |                                       #[cfg(all(not(ldk_bench), any(test, fuzzing)))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 3258 | /             add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(
[INFO] [stdout] 3259 | |                 node_counter, node_id,
[INFO] [stdout] 3260 | |                 value_contribution_msat,
[INFO] [stdout] 3261 | |                 total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node
[INFO] [stdout] 3262 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `add_entry` which comes from the expansion of the macro `add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/routing/scoring.rs:67:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 67 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:174:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 174 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:177:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 177 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:213:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 213 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:215:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 215 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:232:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 232 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:249:15
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 249 | #[cfg(any(not(c_bindings), feature = "_test_utils", test))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:266:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 266 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:272:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 272 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:288:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 288 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:295:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 295 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:298:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 298 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:306:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 306 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:310:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 310 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:314:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 314 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:323:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 323 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:332:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 332 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:339:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 339 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:348:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 348 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:355:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 355 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/scoring.rs:1619:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1619 | #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/routing/scoring.rs:3712:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 3712 | #[cfg(ldk_bench)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:137:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 137 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 178 | define_score!();
[INFO] [stdout]     | --------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `define_score` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:140:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 140 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 178 | define_score!();
[INFO] [stdout]     | --------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `define_score` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/routing/scoring.rs:150:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 150 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 178 | define_score!();
[INFO] [stdout]     | --------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `define_score` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/mod.rs:34:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 34 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/mod.rs:55:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 55 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/mod.rs:69:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 69 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/mod.rs:76:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 76 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/mod.rs:82:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 82 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/sign/mod.rs:943:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 943 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/sign/mod.rs:952:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 952 | #[cfg(not(taproot))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/sign/mod.rs:1726:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1726 | #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/sign/mod.rs:2531:7
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2531 | #[cfg(ldk_bench)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/type_resolver.rs:10:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 10 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/type_resolver.rs:22:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 22 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sign/type_resolver.rs:31:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 |             #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/sign/mod.rs:961:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 961 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |           #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1247:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1247 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1248 | |             &sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 1249 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1250 | |                     input_idx,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1255 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1256 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |           #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1247:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1247 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1248 | |             &sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 1249 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1250 | |                     input_idx,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1255 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1256 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |           #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1323:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1323 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1324 | |             &sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 1325 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1326 | |                     input_idx,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1331 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1332 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |           #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1323:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1323 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1324 | |             &sighash::SighashCache::new(spend_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 1325 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1326 | |                     input_idx,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1331 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1332 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |           #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1452:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1452 |               let htlc_sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  ________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1453 | |                 &sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 1454 | |                     .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1455 | |                         0,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1460 | |                     .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1461 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |           #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1452:23
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1452 |               let htlc_sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  ________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1453 | |                 &sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 1454 | |                     .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1455 | |                         0,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1460 | |                     .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1461 | |             );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |           #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1539:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1539 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1540 | |             &sighash_parts
[INFO] [stdout] 1541 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1542 | |                     input,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1547 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1548 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |           #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1539:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1539 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1540 | |             &sighash_parts
[INFO] [stdout] 1541 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1542 | |                     input,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1547 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1548 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |           #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1589:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1589 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1590 | |             &sighash_parts
[INFO] [stdout] 1591 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1592 | |                     input,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1597 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1598 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |           #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1589:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1589 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1590 | |             &sighash_parts
[INFO] [stdout] 1591 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1592 | |                     input,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1597 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1598 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1620:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1620 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(sighash.as_byte_array());
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1620:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1620 |         let sighash = hash_to_message!(sighash.as_byte_array());
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |           #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1652:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |             &sighash_parts
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                     input,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1660 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1661 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |           #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1652:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1652 |           let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  _______________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 1653 | |             &sighash_parts
[INFO] [stdout] 1654 | |                 .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 1655 | |                     input,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 1660 | |                 .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 1661 | |         );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1694:36
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1694 |         Ok(sign_with_aux_rand(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key, &self))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                          ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1694:36
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1694 |         Ok(sign_with_aux_rand(secp_ctx, &hash_to_message!(&sighash[..]), &self.funding_key, &self))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                          ------------------------------ in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1700:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1700 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1700:17
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1700 |         let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1721:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1721 |         let msg = hash_to_message!(sighash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:1721:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1721 |         let msg = hash_to_message!(sighash);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |           #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2149:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2149 |                       let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  ___________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 2150 | |                         &sighash::SighashCache::new(&psbt.unsigned_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 2151 | |                             .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 2152 | |                                 input_idx,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 2157 | |                             .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 2158 | |                     );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |           #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                 ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2149:20
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2149 |                       let sighash = hash_to_message!(
[INFO] [stdout]      |  ___________________________________-
[INFO] [stdout] 2150 | |                         &sighash::SighashCache::new(&psbt.unsigned_tx)
[INFO] [stdout] 2151 | |                             .p2wsh_signature_hash(
[INFO] [stdout] 2152 | |                                 input_idx,
[INFO] [stdout] ...    |
[INFO] [stdout] 2157 | |                             .unwrap()[..]
[INFO] [stdout] 2158 | |                     );
[INFO] [stdout]      | |_____________________- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2211:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2211 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&hash), secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ----------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2211:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2211 |         Ok(self.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&hash), secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                  ----------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2224:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2224 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2224:18
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2224 |         let msg_hash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&msg.encode()[..])[..]);
[INFO] [stdout]      |                        ----------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/sign/mod.rs:2270:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2270 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:12:13
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   12 |         #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2380:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2380 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&hash), secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ----------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/util/fuzz_wrappers.rs:16:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]   16 |         #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]     ::: src/sign/mod.rs:2380:50
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2380 |         Ok(self.inner.secp_ctx.sign_ecdsa_recoverable(&hash_to_message!(&hash), secret))
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ----------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: this warning originates in the macro `hash_to_message` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `taproot`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/sign/mod.rs:2415:8
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2415 |     #[cfg(taproot)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(taproot)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(taproot)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/async_payments.rs:74:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 74 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/async_payments.rs:78:12
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 78 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/async_payments.rs:105:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 105 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/async_payments.rs:112:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 112 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/dns_resolution.rs:160:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 160 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/dns_resolution.rs:167:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 167 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:28:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 28 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:47:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 47 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1861:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1861 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1882:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1882 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1903:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1903 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1926:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1926 | #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]      |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:996:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 996 |                 #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1647:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1647 |                     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1656:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1656 |                     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1718:11
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1718 |                 #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]      |                       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/onion_message/messenger.rs:1824:9
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1824 |         #[cfg(async_payments)] {
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]               [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]               unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]      = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:20:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 20 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:33:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 33 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:72:8
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 72 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:87:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 87 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:97:10
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 97 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:107:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 107 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:123:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 123 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:144:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 144 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:148:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 148 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:139:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 139 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/offers.rs:159:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 159 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:19:7
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 19 | #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]    |       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:134:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 134 |     #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:155:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 155 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:165:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 165 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:149:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 149 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:169:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 169 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:181:10
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 181 |             #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:194:8
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 194 |     #[cfg(c_bindings)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `c_bindings`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:198:12
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 198 |     #[cfg(not(c_bindings))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |               ^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(c_bindings)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(c_bindings)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `async_payments`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/onion_message/packet.rs:290:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 290 |                 #[cfg(async_payments)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(async_payments)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(async_payments)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/blinded_path/payment.rs:207:18
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 207 |     #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |                     ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> src/crypto/mod.rs:1:11
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 1 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]   |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]            [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]            unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> src/crypto/mod.rs:6:11
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 6 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]   |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]            [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]            unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/crypto/chacha20.rs:12:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 12 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/crypto/chacha20.rs:301:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 301 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/crypto/chacha20.rs:304:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 304 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/crypto/chacha20.rs:338:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 338 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/crypto/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:13:11
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 13 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/crypto/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:169:11
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 169 | #[cfg(not(fuzzing))]
[INFO] [stdout]     |           ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/crypto/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:172:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 172 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `fuzzing`
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/crypto/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs:257:7
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 257 | #[cfg(fuzzing)]
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]              [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]              unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(fuzzing)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(fuzzing)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_test_vectors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/crypto/utils.rs:88:51
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 88 |     #[cfg(all(not(feature = "grind_signatures"), not(ldk_test_vectors)))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_test_vectors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_test_vectors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_test_vectors`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/crypto/utils.rs:90:47
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 90 |     #[cfg(all(not(feature = "grind_signatures"), ldk_test_vectors))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_test_vectors)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_test_vectors)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sync/mod.rs:23:32
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 23 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", not(ldk_bench), test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sync/mod.rs:25:32
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 25 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", not(ldk_bench), test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sync/mod.rs:27:32
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 27 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", not(ldk_bench), test))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sync/mod.rs:31:32
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 31 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", any(ldk_bench, not(test))))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sync/mod.rs:33:32
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 33 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", any(ldk_bench, not(test))))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]   --> src/sync/mod.rs:39:32
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout] 39 | #[cfg(all(feature = "std", any(ldk_bench, not(test))))]
[INFO] [stdout]    |                                ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]    |
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]             [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]             unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]    = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `ldk_bench`
[INFO] [stdout]  --> src/sync/mod.rs:6:12
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout] 6 |     #[cfg(any(ldk_bench, not(test)))]
[INFO] [stdout]   |               ^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]   |
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[INFO] [stdout]            [lints.rust]
[INFO] [stdout]            unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(ldk_bench)'] }
[INFO] [stdout]   = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(ldk_bench)");` to the top of the `build.rs`
[INFO] [stdout]   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/util/indexed_map.rs:114:34
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 |     pub fn range<R: RangeBounds<K>>(&mut self, range: R) -> Range<K, V> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     ^^^^^^^^^               ----------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                     the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: `#[warn(mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes)]` on by default
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 114 |     pub fn range<R: RangeBounds<K>>(&mut self, range: R) -> Range<'_, K, V> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                   +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:9878:3
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]  9878 |         &$self, absolute_expiry: Option<Duration>
[INFO] [stdout]       |         ^^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 10004 |     create_offer_builder!(self, OfferBuilder<DerivedMetadata, secp256k1::All>);
[INFO] [stdout]       |     --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]       |     |                           |
[INFO] [stdout]       |     |                           the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]       |     in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: this warning originates in the macro `create_offer_builder` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10004 |     create_offer_builder!(self, OfferBuilder<'_, DerivedMetadata, secp256k1::All>);
[INFO] [stdout]       |                                              +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]      --> src/ln/channelmanager.rs:9950:3
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]  9950 |         &$self, amount_msats: u64, absolute_expiry: Duration, payment_id: PaymentId,
[INFO] [stdout]       |         ^^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 10006 |     create_refund_builder!(self, RefundBuilder<secp256k1::All>);
[INFO] [stdout]       |     -----------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]       |     |                            |
[INFO] [stdout]       |     |                            the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]       |     in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout]       = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]       = note: this warning originates in the macro `create_refund_builder` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]       |
[INFO] [stdout] 10006 |     create_refund_builder!(self, RefundBuilder<'_, secp256k1::All>);
[INFO] [stdout]       |                                                +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:911:33
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 911 |     pub fn as_holder_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    ^^^^^     ------------------------------------ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                    the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 911 |     pub fn as_holder_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                  ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:923:39
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 923 |     pub fn as_counterparty_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          ^^^^^     ------------------------------------ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 923 |     pub fn as_counterparty_broadcastable(&self) -> DirectedChannelTransactionParameters<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1264:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1264 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedClosingTransaction {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  ^^^^^     ------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1264 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedClosingTransaction<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                     ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1274:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1274 |     pub fn verify(&self, funding_outpoint: OutPoint) -> Result<TrustedClosingTransaction, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here            ------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1274 |     pub fn verify(&self, funding_outpoint: OutPoint) -> Result<TrustedClosingTransaction<'_>, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                         ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1673:15
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1673 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  ^^^^^     ---------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                  the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1673 |     pub fn trust(&self) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/chan_utils.rs:1683:65
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1683 | ...n>(&self, channel_parameters: &DirectedChannelTransactionParameters, broadcaster_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, countersignatory_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<TrustedCommitmentTransaction, (...
[INFO] [stdout]      |       ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here                                                                                                                                                     ---------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1683 |     pub fn verify<T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, channel_parameters: &DirectedChannelTransactionParameters, broadcaster_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, countersignatory_keys: &ChannelPublicKeys, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'_>, ()> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/ln/channel.rs:2967:44
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2967 | ...ref>(&self, commitment_number: u64, keys: &TxCreationKeys, local: bool, generated_by_local: bool, logger: &L) -> CommitmentStats
[INFO] [stdout]      |         ^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here                                                                           --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 2967 |     fn build_commitment_transaction<L: Deref>(&self, commitment_number: u64, keys: &TxCreationKeys, local: bool, generated_by_local: bool, logger: &L) -> CommitmentStats<'_>
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                                                                                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 627 | |     /// but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 628 | |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                             ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                               the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 678 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 628 |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                               ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 645 | |     /// displayed to the user but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 646 | |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                        ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 678 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 646 |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:827:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 827 |     pub fn description(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 827 |     pub fn description(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:853:16
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 853 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 853 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                   ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:968:30
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 968 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullOfferTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^     --------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 968 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullOfferTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:673:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 673 |       pub fn offer_chains(&$self) -> Option<Vec<ChainHash>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 674 | |         $contents.offer_chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 725 | |     /// [`Offer::description`]: crate::offers::offer::Offer::description
[INFO] [stdout] 726 | |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                             ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                               the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 848 |       invoice_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       --------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 726 |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                         ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:673:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 673 |       pub fn offer_chains(&$self) -> Option<Vec<ChainHash>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 674 | |         $contents.offer_chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 743 | |     /// [`Offer::issuer`]: crate::offers::offer::Offer::issuer
[INFO] [stdout] 744 | |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                        ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 848 |       invoice_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       --------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 744 |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                    ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:673:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 673 |       pub fn offer_chains(&$self) -> Option<Vec<ChainHash>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 674 | |         $contents.offer_chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 | |     /// From [`InvoiceRequest::payer_note`] or [`Refund::payer_note`].
[INFO] [stdout] 809 | |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                            ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 848 |       invoice_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       --------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 809 |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:673:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 673 |       pub fn offer_chains(&$self) -> Option<Vec<ChainHash>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 674 | |         $contents.offer_chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 725 | |     /// [`Offer::description`]: crate::offers::offer::Offer::description
[INFO] [stdout] 726 | |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                             ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                               the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |       invoice_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       --------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 726 |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                         ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:673:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 673 |       pub fn offer_chains(&$self) -> Option<Vec<ChainHash>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 674 | |         $contents.offer_chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 743 | |     /// [`Offer::issuer`]: crate::offers::offer::Offer::issuer
[INFO] [stdout] 744 | |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                        ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |       invoice_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       --------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 744 |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                    ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:673:23
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 673 |       pub fn offer_chains(&$self) -> Option<Vec<ChainHash>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 674 | |         $contents.offer_chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 808 | |     /// From [`InvoiceRequest::payer_note`] or [`Refund::payer_note`].
[INFO] [stdout] 809 | |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                            ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 854 |       invoice_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       --------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 809 |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:903:30
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 903 |     pub(crate) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^     ----------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 903 |     pub(crate) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                  ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice.rs:993:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 993 |     fn description(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                    the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 993 |     fn description(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                    ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice.rs:1020:12
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1020 |     fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |               ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |               |
[INFO] [stdout]      |               the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1020 |     fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                               ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice.rs:1084:16
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1084 |     fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                   the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1084 |     fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                   ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice.rs:1169:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1169 |     fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                      ^^^^^     -------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                      |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                      the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1169 |     fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice.rs:1229:19
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1229 |     fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> (InvoiceTlvStreamRef, ExperimentalInvoiceTlvStreamRef) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                      ^^^^^      ------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                      |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                      the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1229 |     fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> (InvoiceTlvStreamRef<'_>, ExperimentalInvoiceTlvStreamRef) {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                    ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 627 | |     /// but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 628 | |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                             ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                               the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/offers/invoice_request.rs:684:2
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 684 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.contents.inner.offer);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 628 |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                               ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 645 | |     /// displayed to the user but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 646 | |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                        ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/offers/invoice_request.rs:684:2
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 684 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.contents.inner.offer);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 646 |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:629:25
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 629 |       pub fn payer_metadata(&$self) -> &[u8] {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 630 | |         $contents.metadata()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 671 | |     /// response.
[INFO] [stdout] 672 | |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                            ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 685 |       invoice_request_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ----------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 672 |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 627 | |     /// but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 628 | |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                             ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                               the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/offers/invoice_request.rs:829:2
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 829 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.contents.inner.offer);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 628 |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                               ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 645 | |     /// displayed to the user but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 646 | |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                        ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/offers/invoice_request.rs:829:2
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 829 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.contents.inner.offer);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 646 |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:629:25
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 629 |       pub fn payer_metadata(&$self) -> &[u8] {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 630 | |         $contents.metadata()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 671 | |     /// response.
[INFO] [stdout] 672 | |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                            ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 830 |       invoice_request_accessors!(self, self.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ----------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 672 |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:700:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 700 |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 831 |     invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self, InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                                         |
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                                         the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |     in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 831 |     invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self, InvoiceBuilder<'_, ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                              +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:700:4
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 700 |           &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________^
[INFO] [stdout] 701 | |     ) -> Result<$builder, Bolt12SemanticError> {
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | |         let created_at = std::time::SystemTime::now()
[INFO] [stdout] 703 | |             .duration_since(std::time::SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH)
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 734 | |     pub fn respond_with_no_std(
[INFO] [stdout] 735 | |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     | |______________^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 831 |       invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self, InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                                         |
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                                         the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |       in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 831 |     invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self, InvoiceBuilder<'_, ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                              +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:856:30
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 856 |     pub(crate) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 ^^^^^     ------------------------------ the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 856 |     pub(crate) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                         ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 627 | |     /// but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 628 | |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                             ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |_____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                               the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/offers/invoice_request.rs:925:2
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 925 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.inner.contents.inner.offer);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 628 |     pub fn description(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                               ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/offer.rs:610:17
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 610 |       pub fn chains(&$self) -> Vec<bitcoin::constants::ChainHash> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 611 | |         $contents.chains()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 645 | |     /// displayed to the user but with the caveat that it has not been verified in any way.
[INFO] [stdout] 646 | |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                        ^            ------------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                          the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]    ::: src/offers/invoice_request.rs:925:2
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 925 |       offer_accessors!(self, self.inner.contents.inner.offer);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `offer_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 646 |     pub fn issuer(&$self) -> Option<$crate::util::string::PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                          ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:629:25
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 629 |       pub fn payer_metadata(&$self) -> &[u8] {
[INFO] [stdout]     |  ____________________________^
[INFO] [stdout] 630 | |         $contents.metadata()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 671 | |     /// response.
[INFO] [stdout] 672 | |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     | |                            ^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     | |____________________________|
[INFO] [stdout]     |                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 926 |       invoice_request_accessors!(self, self.inner.contents);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ----------------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_accessors` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 672 |     pub fn payer_note(&$self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                        ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:700:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 700 |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 928 |     invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                                               |
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                                               the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |     in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 928 |     invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<'_, ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                                    +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:700:4
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 700 |           &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________^
[INFO] [stdout] 701 | |     ) -> Result<$builder, Bolt12SemanticError> {
[INFO] [stdout] 702 | |         let created_at = std::time::SystemTime::now()
[INFO] [stdout] 703 | |             .duration_since(std::time::SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH)
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 734 | |     pub fn respond_with_no_std(
[INFO] [stdout] 735 | |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     | |______________^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 928 |       invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                                               |
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                                               the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |       in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 928 |     invoice_request_respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<'_, ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                                    +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:884:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 884 |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 932 |     invoice_request_respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                                              |
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                                              the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |     in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 932 |     invoice_request_respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<'_, DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                                   +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:884:4
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 884 |           &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________^
[INFO] [stdout] 885 | |     ) -> Result<$builder, Bolt12SemanticError> {
[INFO] [stdout] 886 | |         let created_at = std::time::SystemTime::now()
[INFO] [stdout] 887 | |             .duration_since(std::time::SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH)
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 900 | |     pub fn respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(
[INFO] [stdout] 901 | |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     | |______________^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 932 |       invoice_request_respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                                              |
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                                              the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |       in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `invoice_request_respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 932 |     invoice_request_respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, self.inner, InvoiceBuilder<'_, DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                                                   +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:1022:27
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1022 |     pub(super) fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                              ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                              |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                              the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1022 |     pub(super) fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                              ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:1031:30
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1031 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^     --------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1031 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                            ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     --> src/offers/invoice_request.rs:1052:30
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1052 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 ^^^^^     --------------------------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 |
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                 the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout]      = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]      |
[INFO] [stdout] 1052 |     pub(super) fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> PartialInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]      |                                                                            ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:470:21
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 470 |     pub fn description(&self) -> PrintableString {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        ^^^^^     --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                        the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 470 |     pub fn description(&self) -> PrintableString<'_> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                 ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:494:16
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 494 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                   the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 494 |     pub fn issuer(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                   ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:543:20
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 543 |     pub fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       ^^^^^            --------------- the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       |
[INFO] [stdout]     |                       the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 543 |     pub fn payer_note(&self) -> Option<PrintableString<'_>> {
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                       ++++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:560:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 560 |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 657 |     respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                   |
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                   the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |     in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 657 |     respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<'_, ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                        +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:560:4
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 560 |           &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________^
[INFO] [stdout] 561 | |         signing_pubkey: PublicKey,
[INFO] [stdout] 562 | |     ) -> Result<$builder, Bolt12SemanticError> {
[INFO] [stdout] 563 | |         let created_at = std::time::SystemTime::now()
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 592 | |     pub fn respond_with_no_std(
[INFO] [stdout] 593 | |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     | |______________^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 657 |       respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                   |
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                   the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |       in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 657 |     respond_with_explicit_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<'_, ExplicitSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                        +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:615:3
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 615 |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     |         ^^^^^^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 658 |     respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                  |
[INFO] [stdout]     |     |                                                  the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |     in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 658 |     respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<'_, DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                       +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] 
[INFO] [stdout] warning: hiding a lifetime that's elided elsewhere is confusing
[INFO] [stdout]    --> src/offers/refund.rs:615:4
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 615 |           &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     |  __________^
[INFO] [stdout] 616 | |         expanded_key: &ExpandedKey, entropy_source: ES
[INFO] [stdout] 617 | |     ) -> Result<$builder, Bolt12SemanticError>
[INFO] [stdout] 618 | |     where
[INFO] [stdout] ...   |
[INFO] [stdout] 638 | |     pub fn respond_using_derived_keys_no_std<ES: Deref>(
[INFO] [stdout] 639 | |         &$self, payment_paths: Vec<BlindedPaymentPath>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
[INFO] [stdout]     | |______________^ the lifetime is elided here
[INFO] [stdout] ...
[INFO] [stdout] 658 |       respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                  |
[INFO] [stdout]     |       |                                                  the same lifetime is hidden here
[INFO] [stdout]     |       in this macro invocation
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: the same lifetime is referred to in inconsistent ways, making the signature confusing
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this warning originates in the macro `respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
[INFO] [stdout] help: use `'_` for type paths
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 658 |     respond_with_derived_signing_pubkey_methods!(self, InvoiceBuilder<'_, DerivedSigningPubkey>);
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                                                       +++
[INFO] [stdout] 
[WARN] too many lines in the log, truncating it
