[INFO] fetching crate process_control 5.2.0... [INFO] testing process_control-5.2.0 against beta-2025-09-21 for beta-1.91-3 [INFO] extracting crate process_control 5.2.0 into /workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source [INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 [INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 [INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 written to /workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source/Cargo.toml [INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 on toolchain beta-2025-09-21 [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2025-09-21" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] crate crates.io crate process_control 5.2.0 already has a lockfile, it will not be regenerated [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2025-09-21" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2025-09-21" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 97f80a3bce971de5da98ce95dafa7e994f7d6dfa9d711bef779bc181336bba03 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "97f80a3bce971de5da98ce95dafa7e994f7d6dfa9d711bef779bc181336bba03", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "97f80a3bce971de5da98ce95dafa7e994f7d6dfa9d711bef779bc181336bba03", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "97f80a3bce971de5da98ce95dafa7e994f7d6dfa9d711bef779bc181336bba03", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 97f80a3bce971de5da98ce95dafa7e994f7d6dfa9d711bef779bc181336bba03 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2025-09-21" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] c9a3f3ffa26f3da5ac230c59f3307447b5507f0d7bfed59c69bef1f1ff15a6a6 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "c9a3f3ffa26f3da5ac230c59f3307447b5507f0d7bfed59c69bef1f1ff15a6a6", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Compiling libc v0.2.175 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling attr_alias v0.1.4 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling process_control v5.2.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:86:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 159 | unix_method!(continued, bool); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 160 | unix_method!(core_dumped, bool); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 161 | unix_method!(signal, Option); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 162 | unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:421:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate [INFO] [stdout] = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg [INFO] [stdout] = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 2.09s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "c9a3f3ffa26f3da5ac230c59f3307447b5507f0d7bfed59c69bef1f1ff15a6a6", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "c9a3f3ffa26f3da5ac230c59f3307447b5507f0d7bfed59c69bef1f1ff15a6a6", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] c9a3f3ffa26f3da5ac230c59f3307447b5507f0d7bfed59c69bef1f1ff15a6a6 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2025-09-21" "test" "--frozen" "--no-run" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 822660f4ef7af2ad341352a6c5200c68933c3ac49bcbe9829ebb09b0fad43513 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "822660f4ef7af2ad341352a6c5200c68933c3ac49bcbe9829ebb09b0fad43513", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:86:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 159 | unix_method!(continued, bool); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 160 | unix_method!(core_dumped, bool); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 161 | unix_method!(signal, Option); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 162 | unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:421:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate [INFO] [stdout] = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg [INFO] [stdout] = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Compiling process_control v5.2.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:86:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 159 | unix_method!(continued, bool); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 160 | unix_method!(core_dumped, bool); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 161 | unix_method!(signal, Option); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 162 | unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/lib.rs:421:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate [INFO] [stdout] = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg [INFO] [stdout] = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.43s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "822660f4ef7af2ad341352a6c5200c68933c3ac49bcbe9829ebb09b0fad43513", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "822660f4ef7af2ad341352a6c5200c68933c3ac49bcbe9829ebb09b0fad43513", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 822660f4ef7af2ad341352a6c5200c68933c3ac49bcbe9829ebb09b0fad43513 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc2/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+beta-2025-09-21" "test" "--frozen", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] d087e4045ae7b3aea132322be2ea9683652153d46c21bf478f4c390fddd40b7f [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "d087e4045ae7b3aea132322be2ea9683652153d46c21bf478f4c390fddd40b7f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:86:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 86 | #![cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, feature(doc_cfg))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 159 | unix_method!(continued, bool); [INFO] [stderr] | ----------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 160 | unix_method!(core_dumped, bool); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 161 | unix_method!(signal, Option); [INFO] [stderr] | ----------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:121:20 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 121 | #[cfg_attr(process_control_docs_rs, doc(cfg(unix)))] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 162 | unix_method!(stopped_signal, Option); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(process_control_docs_rs)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(process_control_docs_rs)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `unix_method` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `process_control_docs_rs` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/lib.rs:421:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 421 | #[attr_alias::eval] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: using a cfg inside a attribute macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate [INFO] [stderr] = help: try referring to `attr_alias::eval` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg [INFO] [stderr] = help: the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` may come from an old version of the `attr_alias` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p attr_alias` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the attribute macro `attr_alias::eval` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: `process_control` (lib) generated 6 warnings [INFO] [stderr] warning: `process_control` (lib test) generated 6 warnings (6 duplicates) [INFO] [stderr] Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.03s [INFO] [stderr] Running unittests src/lib.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/process_control-7aa030611f188e70) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 0 tests [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Doc-tests process_control [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 6 tests [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - ChildExt::controlled (line 540) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - Output::into_std_lossy (line 252) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - (line 49) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - ChildExt::controlled_with_output (line 570) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - PipeFilter (line 383) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - ExitStatus::into_std_lossy (line 174) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 6 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.69s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "d087e4045ae7b3aea132322be2ea9683652153d46c21bf478f4c390fddd40b7f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "d087e4045ae7b3aea132322be2ea9683652153d46c21bf478f4c390fddd40b7f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] d087e4045ae7b3aea132322be2ea9683652153d46c21bf478f4c390fddd40b7f