[INFO] fetching crate core_detect 1.0.0... [INFO] testing core_detect-1.0.0 against 1.90.0 for beta-1.91-3 [INFO] extracting crate core_detect 1.0.0 into /workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/source [INFO] started tweaking crates.io crate core_detect 1.0.0 [INFO] finished tweaking crates.io crate core_detect 1.0.0 [INFO] tweaked toml for crates.io crate core_detect 1.0.0 written to /workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/source/Cargo.toml [INFO] validating manifest of crates.io crate core_detect 1.0.0 on toolchain 1.90.0 [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "metadata" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml" "--no-deps", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "generate-lockfile" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Updating crates.io index [INFO] [stderr] Locking 5 packages to latest compatible versions [INFO] running `Command { std: CARGO_HOME="/workspace/cargo-home" RUSTUP_HOME="/workspace/rustup-home" "/workspace/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "fetch" "--manifest-path" "Cargo.toml", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Downloading crates ... [INFO] [stderr] Downloaded cupid v0.6.1 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "metadata" "--no-deps" "--format-version=1", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 959163fbd3a916cb34e8e2a0613ea9ca0d3f3cf9109a23c3f3789304d03de05f [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "959163fbd3a916cb34e8e2a0613ea9ca0d3f3cf9109a23c3f3789304d03de05f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "959163fbd3a916cb34e8e2a0613ea9ca0d3f3cf9109a23c3f3789304d03de05f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "959163fbd3a916cb34e8e2a0613ea9ca0d3f3cf9109a23c3f3789304d03de05f", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 959163fbd3a916cb34e8e2a0613ea9ca0d3f3cf9109a23c3f3789304d03de05f [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "build" "--frozen" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 5027f24394e91da5ebfa962ba2f4026e563edc8f38407d3f8b7d7b825ffa8384 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "5027f24394e91da5ebfa962ba2f4026e563edc8f38407d3f8b7d7b825ffa8384", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Compiling core_detect v1.0.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `std_detect_env_override` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:70:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 70 | #[cfg(feature = "std_detect_env_override")] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `feature` are: `assume_has_cpuid`, `default`, and `unstable_has_cpuid` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider adding `std_detect_env_override` as a feature in `Cargo.toml` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `tsc` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `mmx` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512er` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512cd"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512pf` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512f"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512gfni` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vaes` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vpclmulqdq` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:97:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 97 | mem::transmute(ebx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unnecessary_transmutes)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:98:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 98 | mem::transmute(edx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:99:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 99 | mem::transmute(ecx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.21s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "5027f24394e91da5ebfa962ba2f4026e563edc8f38407d3f8b7d7b825ffa8384", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "5027f24394e91da5ebfa962ba2f4026e563edc8f38407d3f8b7d7b825ffa8384", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 5027f24394e91da5ebfa962ba2f4026e563edc8f38407d3f8b7d7b825ffa8384 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "test" "--frozen" "--no-run" "--message-format=json", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 343f118b68bc3e432bb86ae12e34309c6384c505b4d702e2fdc68b581c217347 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "343f118b68bc3e432bb86ae12e34309c6384c505b4d702e2fdc68b581c217347", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] Compiling gcc v0.3.55 [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `std_detect_env_override` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:70:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 70 | #[cfg(feature = "std_detect_env_override")] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `feature` are: `assume_has_cpuid`, `default`, and `unstable_has_cpuid` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider adding `std_detect_env_override` as a feature in `Cargo.toml` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `tsc` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `mmx` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512er` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512cd"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512pf` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512f"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512gfni` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vaes` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vpclmulqdq` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:97:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 97 | mem::transmute(ebx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unnecessary_transmutes)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:98:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 98 | mem::transmute(edx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:99:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 99 | mem::transmute(ecx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Compiling cupid v0.6.1 [INFO] [stderr] Compiling core_detect v1.0.0 (/opt/rustwide/workdir) [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 22 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 23 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("aes"), [INFO] [stdout] 24 | | information.aesni() [INFO] [stdout] 25 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 20 | check_feature!("aes"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 21 | check_feature!("pclmulqdq"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 22 | check_feature!("rdrand"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 23 | check_feature!("rdseed"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 24 | check_feature!("tsc"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 26 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 27 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("pclmulqdq"), [INFO] [stdout] 28 | | information.pclmulqdq() [INFO] [stdout] 29 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 30 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 31 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("rdrand"), [INFO] [stdout] 32 | | information.rdrand() [INFO] [stdout] 33 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 34 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 35 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("rdseed"), [INFO] [stdout] 36 | | information.rdseed() [INFO] [stdout] 37 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 38 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 39 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("tsc"), [INFO] [stdout] 40 | | information.tsc() [INFO] [stdout] 41 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 42 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 43 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse"), [INFO] [stdout] 44 | | information.sse() [INFO] [stdout] 45 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 46 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 47 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse2"), [INFO] [stdout] 48 | | information.sse2() [INFO] [stdout] 49 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 50 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 51 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse3"), [INFO] [stdout] 52 | | information.sse3() [INFO] [stdout] 53 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 25 | check_feature!("sse"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 26 | check_feature!("sse2"); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 27 | check_feature!("sse3"); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 28 | check_feature!("ssse3"); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 29 | check_feature!("sse4.1"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 30 | check_feature!("sse4.2"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 31 | check_feature!("sse4a"); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 32 | check_feature!("sha"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 33 | check_feature!("avx"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 34 | check_feature!("avx2"); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 35 | check_feature!("avx512f"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 54 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 55 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("ssse3"), [INFO] [stdout] 56 | | information.ssse3() [INFO] [stdout] 57 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 58 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 59 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse4.1"), [INFO] [stdout] 60 | | information.sse4_1() [INFO] [stdout] 61 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 62 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 63 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse4.2"), [INFO] [stdout] 64 | | information.sse4_2() [INFO] [stdout] 65 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 66 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 67 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse4a"), [INFO] [stdout] 68 | | information.sse4a() [INFO] [stdout] 69 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 70 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 71 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sha"), [INFO] [stdout] 72 | | information.sha() [INFO] [stdout] 73 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 74 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 75 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx"), [INFO] [stdout] 76 | | information.avx() [INFO] [stdout] 77 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 78 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 79 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx2"), [INFO] [stdout] 80 | | information.avx2() [INFO] [stdout] 81 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 82 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 83 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512f"), [INFO] [stdout] 84 | | information.avx512f() [INFO] [stdout] 85 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 36 | check_feature!("avx512cd"); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 37 | check_feature!("avx512er"); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 38 | check_feature!("avx512pf"); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 39 | check_feature!("avx512bw"); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 40 | check_feature!("avx512dq"); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 41 | check_feature!("avx512vl"); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 42 | check_feature!("avx512ifma"); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 43 | check_feature!("avx512vbmi"); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 44 | check_feature!("avx512vpopcntdq"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 45 | check_feature!("fma"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 46 | check_feature!("bmi1"); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 86 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 87 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512cd"), [INFO] [stdout] 88 | | information.avx512cd() [INFO] [stdout] 89 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 90 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 91 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512er"), [INFO] [stdout] 92 | | information.avx512er() [INFO] [stdout] 93 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 47 | check_feature!("bmi2"); [INFO] [stdout] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 48 | check_feature!("popcnt"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 94 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 95 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512pf"), [INFO] [stdout] 96 | | information.avx512pf() [INFO] [stdout] 97 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 49 | check_feature!("abm"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 50 | check_feature!("tbm"); [INFO] [stdout] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 51 | check_feature!("lzcnt"); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 52 | check_feature!("xsave"); [INFO] [stdout] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 98 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 99 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512bw"), [INFO] [stdout] 100 | | information.avx512bw() [INFO] [stdout] 101 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 53 | check_feature!("xsaveopt"); [INFO] [stdout] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 54 | check_feature!("xsavec"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 55 | check_feature!("xsaves"); [INFO] [stdout] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 102 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 103 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512dq"), [INFO] [stdout] 104 | | information.avx512dq() [INFO] [stdout] 105 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 106 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 107 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512vl"), [INFO] [stdout] 108 | | information.avx512vl() [INFO] [stdout] 109 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 110 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 111 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512ifma"), [INFO] [stdout] 112 | | information.avx512_ifma() [INFO] [stdout] 113 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 114 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 115 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512vbmi"), [INFO] [stdout] 116 | | information.avx512_vbmi() [INFO] [stdout] 117 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 118 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 119 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512vpopcntdq"), [INFO] [stdout] 120 | | information.avx512_vpopcntdq() [INFO] [stdout] 121 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 122 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 123 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("fma"), [INFO] [stdout] 124 | | information.fma() [INFO] [stdout] 125 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 126 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 127 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("bmi1"), [INFO] [stdout] 128 | | information.bmi1() [INFO] [stdout] 129 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 130 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 131 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("bmi2"), [INFO] [stdout] 132 | | information.bmi2() [INFO] [stdout] 133 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 134 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 135 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("popcnt"), [INFO] [stdout] 136 | | information.popcnt() [INFO] [stdout] 137 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 138 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 139 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("abm"), [INFO] [stdout] 140 | | information.lzcnt() [INFO] [stdout] 141 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 142 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 143 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("tbm"), [INFO] [stdout] 144 | | information.tbm() [INFO] [stdout] 145 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 146 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 147 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("lzcnt"), [INFO] [stdout] 148 | | information.lzcnt() [INFO] [stdout] 149 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 150 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 151 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsave"), [INFO] [stdout] 152 | | information.xsave() [INFO] [stdout] 153 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 154 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 155 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsaveopt"), [INFO] [stdout] 156 | | information.xsaveopt() [INFO] [stdout] 157 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 158 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 159 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsavec"), [INFO] [stdout] 160 | | information.xsavec_and_xrstor() [INFO] [stdout] 161 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 162 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 163 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsaves"), [INFO] [stdout] 164 | | information.xsaves_xrstors_and_ia32_xss() [INFO] [stdout] 165 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 166 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 167 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("cmpxchg16b"), [INFO] [stdout] 168 | | information.cmpxchg16b(), [INFO] [stdout] 169 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 170 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 171 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("adx"), [INFO] [stdout] 172 | | information.adx(), [INFO] [stdout] 173 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stdout] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] ... [INFO] [stdout] 174 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] 175 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("rtm"), [INFO] [stdout] 176 | | information.rtm(), [INFO] [stdout] 177 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `std_detect_env_override` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:70:19 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 70 | #[cfg(feature = "std_detect_env_override")] [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `feature` are: `assume_has_cpuid`, `default`, and `unstable_has_cpuid` [INFO] [stdout] = help: consider adding `std_detect_env_override` as a feature in `Cargo.toml` [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `tsc` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `mmx` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512er` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512cd"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512pf` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512f"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512gfni` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vaes` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vpclmulqdq` [INFO] [stdout] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stdout] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stdout] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stdout] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stdout] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stdout] ... | [INFO] [stdout] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stdout] 195 | | } [INFO] [stdout] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stdout] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stdout] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:97:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 97 | mem::transmute(ebx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] = note: `#[warn(unnecessary_transmutes)]` on by default [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:98:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 98 | mem::transmute(edx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stdout] --> src/os/x86.rs:99:13 [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] 99 | mem::transmute(ecx), [INFO] [stdout] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stdout] | | [INFO] [stdout] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stdout] | [INFO] [stdout] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 2.28s [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "343f118b68bc3e432bb86ae12e34309c6384c505b4d702e2fdc68b581c217347", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "343f118b68bc3e432bb86ae12e34309c6384c505b4d702e2fdc68b581c217347", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 343f118b68bc3e432bb86ae12e34309c6384c505b4d702e2fdc68b581c217347 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "create" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/target:/opt/rustwide/target:rw,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/builds/worker-3-tc1/source:/opt/rustwide/workdir:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/cargo-home:/opt/rustwide/cargo-home:ro,Z" "-v" "/var/lib/crater-agent-workspace/rustup-home:/opt/rustwide/rustup-home:ro,Z" "-e" "SOURCE_DIR=/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-e" "CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/opt/rustwide/target" "-e" "CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" "-e" "RUST_BACKTRACE=full" "-e" "RUSTFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "RUSTDOCFLAGS=--cap-lints=warn" "-e" "CARGO_HOME=/opt/rustwide/cargo-home" "-e" "RUSTUP_HOME=/opt/rustwide/rustup-home" "-w" "/opt/rustwide/workdir" "-m" "1610612736" "--user" "0:0" "--network" "none" "ghcr.io/rust-lang/crates-build-env/linux@sha256:e90291280db7d1fac5b66fc6dad9f9662629e7365a55743daf9bdf73ebc4ea79" "/opt/rustwide/cargo-home/bin/cargo" "+1.90.0" "test" "--frozen", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 41e412507bd204ff0475d1874f544f014e975b4bc199b1de9f192aa29cf27097 [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "start" "-a" "41e412507bd204ff0475d1874f544f014e975b4bc199b1de9f192aa29cf27097", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `std_detect_env_override` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:70:19 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 70 | #[cfg(feature = "std_detect_env_override")] [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `feature` are: `assume_has_cpuid`, `default`, and `unstable_has_cpuid` [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider adding `std_detect_env_override` as a feature in `Cargo.toml` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `tsc` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `mmx` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512er` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stderr] | | [INFO] [stderr] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512cd"` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512pf` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stderr] | | [INFO] [stderr] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512f"` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512gfni` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stderr] | | [INFO] [stderr] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vaes` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^------------ [INFO] [stderr] | | [INFO] [stderr] | help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"avx512vnni"` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `avx512vpclmulqdq` [INFO] [stderr] --> src/macros.rs:94:26 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 94 | cfg!(target_feature = $feature_lit) || [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] ::: src/arch/x86.rs:18:1 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 18 | / features! { [INFO] [stderr] 19 | | @TARGET: x86; [INFO] [stderr] 20 | | @MACRO_NAME: is_x86_feature_detected; [INFO] [stderr] 21 | | @MACRO_ATTRS: [INFO] [stderr] ... | [INFO] [stderr] 194 | | /// RTM, Intel (Restricted Transactional Memory) [INFO] [stderr] 195 | | } [INFO] [stderr] | |_- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = note: expected values for `target_feature` are: `10e60`, `2e3`, `3e3r1`, `3e3r2`, `3e3r3`, `3e7`, `7e10`, `a`, `aclass`, `adx`, `aes`, `altivec`, `alu32`, `amx-avx512`, `amx-bf16`, `amx-complex`, `amx-fp16`, `amx-fp8`, `amx-int8`, `amx-movrs`, `amx-tf32`, `amx-tile`, `amx-transpose`, `apxf`, `atomics`, `avx`, `avx10.1`, `avx10.2`, `avx2`, `avx512bf16`, `avx512bitalg`, `avx512bw`, `avx512cd`, `avx512dq`, and `avx512f` and 369 more [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `features` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stderr] --> src/os/x86.rs:97:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 97 | mem::transmute(ebx), [INFO] [stderr] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | | [INFO] [stderr] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unnecessary_transmutes)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stderr] --> src/os/x86.rs:98:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 98 | mem::transmute(edx), [INFO] [stderr] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | | [INFO] [stderr] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unnecessary transmute [INFO] [stderr] --> src/os/x86.rs:99:13 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 99 | mem::transmute(ecx), [INFO] [stderr] | --------------^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] | | [INFO] [stderr] | help: replace this with: `u32::to_ne_bytes` [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: there's also `to_le_bytes` and `to_be_bytes` if you expect a particular byte order [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: `core_detect` (lib) generated 11 warnings (run `cargo fix --lib -p core_detect` to apply 3 suggestions) [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 22 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 23 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("aes"), [INFO] [stderr] 24 | | information.aesni() [INFO] [stderr] 25 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 26 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 27 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("pclmulqdq"), [INFO] [stderr] 28 | | information.pclmulqdq() [INFO] [stderr] 29 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 30 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 31 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("rdrand"), [INFO] [stderr] 32 | | information.rdrand() [INFO] [stderr] 33 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 34 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 35 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("rdseed"), [INFO] [stderr] 36 | | information.rdseed() [INFO] [stderr] 37 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 38 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 39 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("tsc"), [INFO] [stderr] 40 | | information.tsc() [INFO] [stderr] 41 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 42 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 43 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse"), [INFO] [stderr] 44 | | information.sse() [INFO] [stderr] 45 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 46 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 47 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse2"), [INFO] [stderr] 48 | | information.sse2() [INFO] [stderr] 49 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 50 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 51 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse3"), [INFO] [stderr] 52 | | information.sse3() [INFO] [stderr] 53 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 54 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 55 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("ssse3"), [INFO] [stderr] 56 | | information.ssse3() [INFO] [stderr] 57 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 58 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 59 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse4.1"), [INFO] [stderr] 60 | | information.sse4_1() [INFO] [stderr] 61 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 62 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 63 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse4.2"), [INFO] [stderr] 64 | | information.sse4_2() [INFO] [stderr] 65 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 66 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 67 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sse4a"), [INFO] [stderr] 68 | | information.sse4a() [INFO] [stderr] 69 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 70 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 71 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("sha"), [INFO] [stderr] 72 | | information.sha() [INFO] [stderr] 73 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 74 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 75 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx"), [INFO] [stderr] 76 | | information.avx() [INFO] [stderr] 77 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 78 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 79 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx2"), [INFO] [stderr] 80 | | information.avx2() [INFO] [stderr] 81 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 82 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 83 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512f"), [INFO] [stderr] 84 | | information.avx512f() [INFO] [stderr] 85 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 86 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 87 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512cd"), [INFO] [stderr] 88 | | information.avx512cd() [INFO] [stderr] 89 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 90 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 91 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512er"), [INFO] [stderr] 92 | | information.avx512er() [INFO] [stderr] 93 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 94 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 95 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512pf"), [INFO] [stderr] 96 | | information.avx512pf() [INFO] [stderr] 97 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 98 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 99 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512bw"), [INFO] [stderr] 100 | | information.avx512bw() [INFO] [stderr] 101 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 102 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 103 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512dq"), [INFO] [stderr] 104 | | information.avx512dq() [INFO] [stderr] 105 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 106 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 107 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512vl"), [INFO] [stderr] 108 | | information.avx512vl() [INFO] [stderr] 109 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 110 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] 111 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512ifma"), [INFO] [stdout] running 0 tests [INFO] [stderr] 112 | | information.avx512_ifma() [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] 113 | | ); [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] running 1 test [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] test compare_with_cupid ... ok [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 114 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 115 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512vbmi"), [INFO] [stderr] 116 | | information.avx512_vbmi() [INFO] [stderr] 117 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 118 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 119 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("avx512vpopcntdq"), [INFO] [stderr] 120 | | information.avx512_vpopcntdq() [INFO] [stderr] 121 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 122 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 123 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("fma"), [INFO] [stderr] 124 | | information.fma() [INFO] [stderr] 125 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 126 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 127 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("bmi1"), [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] 128 | | information.bmi1() [INFO] [stdout] running 1 test [INFO] [stderr] 129 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stdout] test compare_with_std ... ok [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 130 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 131 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("bmi2"), [INFO] [stderr] 132 | | information.bmi2() [INFO] [stderr] 133 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 134 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 135 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("popcnt"), [INFO] [stderr] 136 | | information.popcnt() [INFO] [stderr] 137 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 138 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 139 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("abm"), [INFO] [stderr] 140 | | information.lzcnt() [INFO] [stderr] 141 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 142 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 143 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("tbm"), [INFO] [stderr] 144 | | information.tbm() [INFO] [stderr] 145 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 146 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 147 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("lzcnt"), [INFO] [stderr] 148 | | information.lzcnt() [INFO] [stderr] 149 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 150 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 151 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsave"), [INFO] [stderr] 152 | | information.xsave() [INFO] [stderr] 153 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 154 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 155 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsaveopt"), [INFO] [stderr] 156 | | information.xsaveopt() [INFO] [stderr] 157 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 158 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 159 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsavec"), [INFO] [stderr] 160 | | information.xsavec_and_xrstor() [INFO] [stderr] 161 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 162 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 163 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("xsaves"), [INFO] [stderr] 164 | | information.xsaves_xrstors_and_ia32_xss() [INFO] [stderr] 165 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 166 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 167 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("cmpxchg16b"), [INFO] [stderr] 168 | | information.cmpxchg16b(), [INFO] [stderr] 169 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 170 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 171 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("adx"), [INFO] [stderr] 172 | | information.adx(), [INFO] [stderr] 173 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_cupid.rs:7:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 7 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 174 | / check_feature!( [INFO] [stderr] 175 | | core_detect::is_x86_feature_detected!("rtm"), [INFO] [stderr] 176 | | information.rtm(), [INFO] [stderr] 177 | | ); [INFO] [stderr] | |_____- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 20 | check_feature!("aes"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: expected names are: `docsrs`, `feature`, and `test` and 31 more [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 21 | check_feature!("pclmulqdq"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 22 | check_feature!("rdrand"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 23 | check_feature!("rdseed"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 24 | check_feature!("tsc"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 25 | check_feature!("sse"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 26 | check_feature!("sse2"); [INFO] [stderr] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 27 | check_feature!("sse3"); [INFO] [stderr] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 28 | check_feature!("ssse3"); [INFO] [stderr] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 29 | check_feature!("sse4.1"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 30 | check_feature!("sse4.2"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 31 | check_feature!("sse4a"); [INFO] [stderr] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 32 | check_feature!("sha"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 33 | check_feature!("avx"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 34 | check_feature!("avx2"); [INFO] [stderr] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 35 | check_feature!("avx512f"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 36 | check_feature!("avx512cd"); [INFO] [stderr] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 37 | check_feature!("avx512er"); [INFO] [stderr] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 38 | check_feature!("avx512pf"); [INFO] [stderr] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 39 | check_feature!("avx512bw"); [INFO] [stderr] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 40 | check_feature!("avx512dq"); [INFO] [stderr] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 41 | check_feature!("avx512vl"); [INFO] [stderr] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 42 | check_feature!("avx512ifma"); [INFO] [stderr] | ---------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 43 | check_feature!("avx512vbmi"); [INFO] [stderr] | ---------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 44 | check_feature!("avx512vpopcntdq"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 45 | check_feature!("fma"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 46 | check_feature!("bmi1"); [INFO] [stderr] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 47 | check_feature!("bmi2"); [INFO] [stderr] | ---------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 48 | check_feature!("popcnt"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 49 | check_feature!("abm"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 50 | check_feature!("tbm"); [INFO] [stderr] | --------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 51 | check_feature!("lzcnt"); [INFO] [stderr] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 52 | check_feature!("xsave"); [INFO] [stderr] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 53 | check_feature!("xsaveopt"); [INFO] [stderr] | -------------------------- in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 54 | check_feature!("xsavec"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `allow_false_negative` [INFO] [stderr] --> tests/compare_std.rs:6:21 [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] 6 | if cfg!(allow_false_negative) { [INFO] [stderr] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [INFO] [stderr] ... [INFO] [stderr] 55 | check_feature!("xsaves"); [INFO] [stderr] | ------------------------ in this macro invocation [INFO] [stderr] | [INFO] [stderr] = help: consider using a Cargo feature instead [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint: [INFO] [stderr] [lints.rust] [INFO] [stderr] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(allow_false_negative)'] } [INFO] [stderr] = help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(allow_false_negative)");` to the top of the `build.rs` [INFO] [stderr] = note: see for more information about checking conditional configuration [INFO] [stderr] = note: this warning originates in the macro `check_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [INFO] [stderr] [INFO] [stderr] warning: `core_detect` (test "compare_cupid") generated 39 warnings [INFO] [stderr] warning: `core_detect` (test "compare_std") generated 36 warnings [INFO] [stderr] warning: `core_detect` (lib test) generated 11 warnings (11 duplicates) [INFO] [stderr] Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s [INFO] [stderr] Running unittests src/lib.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/core_detect-363c13fad19d4be7) [INFO] [stderr] Running tests/compare_cupid.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/compare_cupid-35bc8c19528e4cf0) [INFO] [stderr] Running tests/compare_std.rs (/opt/rustwide/target/debug/deps/compare_std-ceb058f75abb8a66) [INFO] [stderr] Doc-tests core_detect [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] running 1 test [INFO] [stdout] test src/lib.rs - (line 10) ... ok [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] [stdout] test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.33s [INFO] [stdout] [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "inspect" "41e412507bd204ff0475d1874f544f014e975b4bc199b1de9f192aa29cf27097", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] running `Command { std: "docker" "rm" "-f" "41e412507bd204ff0475d1874f544f014e975b4bc199b1de9f192aa29cf27097", kill_on_drop: false }` [INFO] [stdout] 41e412507bd204ff0475d1874f544f014e975b4bc199b1de9f192aa29cf27097